BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 94A(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi7Mumbai4Bangalore3Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4Addition to Income4Section 683Section 132(4)2Search & Seizure2

A.W. FABER CASTELL (INDIA) P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 9(1)(1), MUMBAI

Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1037/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Apr 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Ashwani Taneja

For Appellant: Mr. M.P. LohiaFor Respondent: Mrs. Malathi Sridharan CIT(DR)
Section 144CSection 36(1)

94A of Chapter X of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee contended before the AO that the royalty paid to its AE for user of its trade mark and brand name at the rate of 3% was within the rates allowed by the FIPB unit of Ministry of Finance and, therefore, it was ‘ALP’ price and no further study

NISH DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT - CC -6(3), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee except ITA

ITA 3129/MUM/2018[2011-12]Status: Disposed
ITAT Mumbai
12 Mar 2021
AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Ram Lal Negi

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Joshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri P.C. Chhotaray
Section 132(4)

4 of its appeal. 32. The facts in brief are that the assessee company has made purchases of steel from M/s Krishna Structure Steels Pvt. Ltd. and accordingly claimed the same as materials purchased. The said materials was supplied to its contractors M/S Simplex Infra Ltd as the construction work was awarded to the said company. The steel purchased from

NISH DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT- CC- 6(3), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee except ITA

ITA 3131/MUM/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Mar 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Ram Lal Negi

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Joshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri P.C. Chhotaray
Section 132(4)

4 of its appeal. 32. The facts in brief are that the assessee company has made purchases of steel from M/s Krishna Structure Steels Pvt. Ltd. and accordingly claimed the same as materials purchased. The said materials was supplied to its contractors M/S Simplex Infra Ltd as the construction work was awarded to the said company. The steel purchased from

INDUS SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE3(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4730/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Oct 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Madhur Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Krishna Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 14ASection 68

94A, Maker Chambers III, Income Tax, Nariman Point, Vs. Circle -3(2)(1), Mumbai – 400021 Mumbai (PAN : AAACI0327H) (Assessee) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee : Shri Madhur Agarwal, Advocate Revenue : Shri Krishna Kumar, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 29.10.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 30.10.2024 O R D E R PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal filed by the assessee is against