BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 44Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi17Dehradun6Mumbai4Lucknow1Jaipur1Chandigarh1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 44B7Section 144C5Section 2634Section 143(3)3Section 9(1)(vi)3Section 1722Section 1432Double Taxation/DTAA2

AVANA GLOBAL FZCO,MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAX)-1, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2731/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jul 2024AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Shri Dhanesh Bafna, Shri Hardik Nirmal & Ms. HinalFor Respondent: Smt. Shaileja Rai, CIT, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 144C(3)Section 263

Transfer Pricing Officer\"\nshall have the same meaning as assigned to it in the Explanation to section\n92CA.]\n(2) No order shall be made under sub-section (1) after the expiry of two\nyears from the end of the financial year in which the order sought to be\nrevised was passed.\n(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section

TAJ TV LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-4(1)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 821/MUM/2021[2017-18]Status: Disposed
ITAT Mumbai
31 Mar 2023
AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm Taj Tv Limited Dcit (International C/O. Suresh Surana & Taxation)-4(1)(2) Associates Llp Air India Building, 8Th Floor, Bakhtawar, Vs. Nariman Point, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 Mumbai-400 021 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabct6542J Reference Of Orders / Directions In Appeal Sr Orders & Directions Passed By Date No 1 Draft Assessment Order U/S The Deputy 27/12/2019 144C Of The Act Commissioner Of Income Tax , International Taxation, Circle 4 (1) (2), Mumbai 2 Direction U/S 144C (5) Of The Cit (Drp-2) , 22/03/2021 Act Mumbai - 2 3 Assessment Order U/S 143 93) The Deputy 12/04/2021 R.W.S 144C (13) Of The Act Commissioner Of Income Tax , International Taxation, Circle 4 (1) (2), Mumbai

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwala Sr AdvFor Respondent: Shri G.C. Srivastava, Adv
Section 143Section 144C

transfer without the prior written permission of Taj India, the whole or any part of its rights to any party in its absolute discretion. g. It can be seen that a major part of the risk in terms of market risk and technology risk are borne by the Taj India. Further measure of the revenue is from advertisement and subscription

NAN LIAN SHIP MANAGEMENT LLC,MUMBAI vs. JCIT (OSD)(INT TAX)-3(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 976/MUM/2023[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Aug 2023AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Blenan Lian Ship Management Llc V. Jcit (Osd) (Intl. Tax) – 3(3)(1) 303, The Atrium Center Room No. 1630, 16Th Floor Khalid Bin Al Walled Road Air India Building Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 Bur Dubai Po Box No. 82289 Dubai, Uae Nan Lian Ship Management Llc C/O. Nishit M. Gandhi Chambers 2 & 3, Ground Floor Cosmos Trade Place, Khatau Building Alkesh Dinesh Mody Marg Opp. Bombay Stock Exchange Fort, Mumbai - 400001 Pan: Aagcn0478E (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 172Section 44BSection 9(1)(vi)

section 44B. 11. What is to be seen is, whether the assessee has given use or right to use the ship to PSCL and the payment received for time charter services falls within the ambit and definition of Clause (iva) (supra) or not. The relevant clauses of Time Charter agreement as noted and analysed by the AO reads as under

FEEDERTECH PTE LYD,NERUL, NAVI MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NARIMAN POINT

Accordingly.\n9.\nIn result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4206/MUM/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Feb 2025AY 2018-19
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 15Section 234BSection 234CSection 44B

44B @ 7.5% and claimed the same as exempt in the return. The ld.\nAR submitted that it is a well-settled position that in the case of eligible assessee\nas per section 144C(15) of the Act, the final assessment order passed by the AO\nwithout passing the draft assessment order is held to be null and void