BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2,409 results for “transfer pricing”+ Carry Forward of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,409Delhi1,086Kolkata492Ahmedabad412Bangalore404Pune402Chennai208Karnataka207Jaipur201Chandigarh181Hyderabad112Cochin109Indore77Visakhapatnam73Surat54Rajkot50Raipur42Nagpur39Calcutta38Lucknow32Amritsar25Cuttack24Guwahati24SC17Telangana16Varanasi10Jodhpur8Ranchi7Jabalpur7Agra7Panaji5Dehradun4Kerala3Rajasthan2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Orissa1Andhra Pradesh1Allahabad1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)81Addition to Income58Disallowance44Section 14A41Transfer Pricing33Deduction21Section 115J19Section 10(38)15Long Term Capital Gains

GOLDMAN SACHS (INDIA) SECURITIES PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL.C.I.T. RG.3(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal stands partly allowed

ITA 6912/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Jul 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Ashwani Taneja

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwala, Sr. CounselFor Respondent: Shri N.K. Chand
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 92C(2)

losses as operating in nature). This is without prejudice to the Appellant's position that MTL is not comparable to the Appellant. 3. Without prejudice to above grounds, in not granting the benefit of the provisions of section 92C(2) (i.e variation of +/- 5 percent) of the Act in computing the revised ALP for the following international transactions:  Investment advisory

FIRMENICH AROMATICS (INDIA) P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 9(3)(1), MUMBAI

Showing 1–20 of 2,409 · Page 1 of 121

...
15
Comparables/TP15
Section 143(2)14
Section 25013

In the result, assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 2590/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Jul 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Dhanesh Bafnaa/wFor Respondent: Shri Jayant Kumar
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)

carried on from past several years, it does not mean that the assessee would not require the technical knowhow of the AE, hence, there is no necessity for paying royalty to the AE. More so, when the Department accepts availing of technical knowhow while allowing a part of royalty even on estimate basis. Therefore, keeping in view the relevant statutory

ACCENTURE SERVICES P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT RG 3(1), MUMBAI

In the result, assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 7686/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jul 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwallaa/wFor Respondent: Shri Saurabh Deshpande
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 154Section 92C

carried out on–site as well as off– shore the contract revenue could not be separately bifurcated for on– site work.It is relevant to observe,while rejecting R.S. Software (India) Ltd., the Transfer Pricing Officer noticing that it has incurred substantial foreign currency expenditure has opined that it must have substantial on–site revenue and accordingly held that the company

VIACOM 18, MEDIA PVT LTD ,MUMBAI vs. PCIT-8, MUMBAI

ITA 2591/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan ()

For Appellant: Mr. Madhur Agarwal/Ms. MokshaFor Respondent: Mr. Vivek Perampurna, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 263Section 32

carried forward and set off losses of Rs. 7,39,70,30,887/- upto assessment year 2018-19 and losses for A.Y. 2019-20 shown Rs.2,82,64,81,723/- in CFL. However, no loss shown in computation of ITR 2019-20. Please explain and provide calculation accordingly.” 5.5 In response to above query, the assessee filed a detailed submission

ACCENTURE SERVICES P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIR 3(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal is partly allowed

ITA 1671/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jun 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyand Shri N.K. Pradhan

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwalaa/w Shri Hiten ChandeFor Respondent: Shri Anand Mohan
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)

Loss Account of the company forming part of the annual report, it is noticed that a substantial part of the revenue earned by the company during the year is from software development and consulting services. Thus, prima–facie it appears that the company is functionally similar to the assessee. In case of ACIT v/s M/s. Synechron Technologies

J.P MORGAN ADVISORS INDIA P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT RG 3(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal is partly allowed

ITA 990/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jun 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri Madhur AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Anand Mohan
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)

Loss account does indicate that the company, though, has earned revenue from different segments such as portfolio management fee, performance fee, advisory fee, etc., but the segmental details are not available Further, we have also noted from the annual report of the company that it has made investment and also incurred brokerage expenses. If we compare the assessee’s activities

DCIT CENT. CIR. 5(2), MUMBAI vs. IPCA LABORATORIES LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the learned assessing officer is dismissed

ITA 5227/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

For Appellant: Shri F.V. Irani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar, DR
Section 801BSection 801CSection 80ISection 92C

carried out between associated companies, the appropriate ascertainment of transfer prices and of the arm’s length principle should take into account the set of products as compared to a pack of similar products, which is referred to as the basket approach. Generally such approach would be suitable for the set of products traded as a whole or have their

IPCA LABORATORIES LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT (LTU), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the learned assessing officer is dismissed

ITA 2493/MUM/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

For Appellant: Shri F.V. Irani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar, DR
Section 801BSection 801CSection 80ISection 92C

carried out between associated companies, the appropriate ascertainment of transfer prices and of the arm’s length principle should take into account the set of products as compared to a pack of similar products, which is referred to as the basket approach. Generally such approach would be suitable for the set of products traded as a whole or have their

IPCA LABORATORIES LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT LTU, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the learned assessing officer is dismissed

ITA 3811/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

For Appellant: Shri F.V. Irani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar, DR
Section 801BSection 801CSection 80ISection 92C

carried out between associated companies, the appropriate ascertainment of transfer prices and of the arm’s length principle should take into account the set of products as compared to a pack of similar products, which is referred to as the basket approach. Generally such approach would be suitable for the set of products traded as a whole or have their

IPCA LABORATORIES LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (LTU), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the learned assessing officer is dismissed

ITA 8120/MUM/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

For Appellant: Shri F.V. Irani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar, DR
Section 801BSection 801CSection 80ISection 92C

carried out between associated companies, the appropriate ascertainment of transfer prices and of the arm’s length principle should take into account the set of products as compared to a pack of similar products, which is referred to as the basket approach. Generally such approach would be suitable for the set of products traded as a whole or have their

IPCA LABORATORIES LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (LTU), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the learned assessing officer is dismissed

ITA 3267/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

For Appellant: Shri F.V. Irani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar, DR
Section 801BSection 801CSection 80ISection 92C

carried out between associated companies, the appropriate ascertainment of transfer prices and of the arm’s length principle should take into account the set of products as compared to a pack of similar products, which is referred to as the basket approach. Generally such approach would be suitable for the set of products traded as a whole or have their

IPCA LABORATORIES LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (LTU), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the learned assessing officer is dismissed

ITA 8084/MUM/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

For Appellant: Shri F.V. Irani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar, DR
Section 801BSection 801CSection 80ISection 92C

carried out between associated companies, the appropriate ascertainment of transfer prices and of the arm’s length principle should take into account the set of products as compared to a pack of similar products, which is referred to as the basket approach. Generally such approach would be suitable for the set of products traded as a whole or have their

ACIT CEN CIR 13, MUMBAI vs. IPCA LABORATORIES LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the learned assessing officer is dismissed

ITA 7511/MUM/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

For Appellant: Shri F.V. Irani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar, DR
Section 801BSection 801CSection 80ISection 92C

carried out between associated companies, the appropriate ascertainment of transfer prices and of the arm’s length principle should take into account the set of products as compared to a pack of similar products, which is referred to as the basket approach. Generally such approach would be suitable for the set of products traded as a whole or have their

DCIT (LTU) 1, MUMBAI vs. IPCA LABORATORIES LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the learned assessing officer is dismissed

ITA 2815/MUM/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

For Appellant: Shri F.V. Irani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar, DR
Section 801BSection 801CSection 80ISection 92C

carried out between associated companies, the appropriate ascertainment of transfer prices and of the arm’s length principle should take into account the set of products as compared to a pack of similar products, which is referred to as the basket approach. Generally such approach would be suitable for the set of products traded as a whole or have their

ASST CIT (LTU) 1, MUMBAI vs. IPCA LABORATORIES LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the learned assessing officer is dismissed

ITA 3691/MUM/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

For Appellant: Shri F.V. Irani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar, DR
Section 801BSection 801CSection 80ISection 92C

carried out between associated companies, the appropriate ascertainment of transfer prices and of the arm’s length principle should take into account the set of products as compared to a pack of similar products, which is referred to as the basket approach. Generally such approach would be suitable for the set of products traded as a whole or have their

IPCA LABORATORIES LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT (LTU), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the learned assessing officer is dismissed

ITA 3597/MUM/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

For Appellant: Shri F.V. Irani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar, DR
Section 801BSection 801CSection 80ISection 92C

carried out between associated companies, the appropriate ascertainment of transfer prices and of the arm’s length principle should take into account the set of products as compared to a pack of similar products, which is referred to as the basket approach. Generally such approach would be suitable for the set of products traded as a whole or have their

ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ADDL. COMM OF INCOME TAX RANGE-11 (1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3406/MUM/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 May 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri G.S.Pannu & Shri Ravish Soodzee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd., 135, Continental Building, Dr.A.B.Road, Worli, Mumbai 400 020 Pan:Aaacz 0243R ...... Appellant Vs. The Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range -11(1), 4Th Floor, Room No.434, Aaykar Bhavan,M.K.Road, Mumbai – 400 020 .... Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Vijay MehtaFor Respondent: S/Shri N.K.Chand &
Section 143(3)

carried out with an intention to ‘shift profit’. Though we are unable to find any statutory backing for the aforesaid stand of the Transfer Pricing Officer, but even going by the factual matrix of the present case, there is no material to say that the transaction in question is of ‘dubious nature’, as our subsequent discussion would show. 7.4 Firstly

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S BANK OF INDIA, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1549/MUM/2023[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Dec 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: MS. SUCHITRA RAGHUNATH KAMBLE (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P. J. Pardiwala, Sr. Advocate and Shri C. Naresh, CAFor Respondent: Shri Satya Pal Kumar, CIT DR
Section 10Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 90

price goes up in order to earn profits. In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue challenging the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in State Bank of Patiala also fail, though low in this respect has been clarified hereinabove." 7. The judgment of the Punjab and Haryana Court in the case of State Bank of Patiala

MATRIX PARTNERS INDIA INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC,MAURITIUS vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 3097/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jan 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Ms. Padmavathy S ()

Section 115JSection 13(3)Section 143(2)Section 234ASection 270ASection 274

transfer of equity shares during the relevant previous year, and treat them separately, i.e., claiming gains as exempt under the DTAA and claiming losses to be carried forward under the provisions of the Act.” 4. On receipt of the DRP directions, the Ld.AO passed the impugned assessment order by reducing the Long-term capital loss against the long term capital

VIACOM 18 MEDIA P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT 11(1), MUMBAI

In the result, assessee‟s appeal for A

ITA 8754/MUM/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Sept 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

loss, as the case may be, computed on the basis of entries made in the books of account in respect of the previous year in which the international transaction was entered into.' From the above discussion it is vivid that whereas in the first situation, the ALP represents the true value of transaction or, profitability as will be there