BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 94Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka99Mumbai4Delhi2Bangalore2Pune1Hyderabad1Jabalpur1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)5Addition to Income4Section 14A3Section 683Search & Seizure3Section 80I2Section 153A2Section 132(4)2

INDUS SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE3(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4730/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Oct 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Madhur Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Krishna Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 14ASection 68

94A, Maker Chambers III, Income Tax, Nariman Point, Vs. Circle -3(2)(1), Mumbai – 400021 Mumbai (PAN : AAACI0327H) (Assessee) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee : Shri Madhur Agarwal, Advocate Revenue : Shri Krishna Kumar, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 29.10.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 30.10.2024 O R D E R PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal filed by the assessee is against

ORBIT CORPORATION LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

ITA 2979/MUM/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Apr 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Om Prakash Kant

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Jasdeep Singh, CIT D.R
Section 132(1)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153ASection 80I

68,640/-, Rs.68,50,73,400/- & Rs.60,33,56,410/- for A.Y. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 under section 153A read with section 143(3) of the Act respectively. 4. Assessee carried the matter before the Ld. CIT(A) by way of filing appeal who has partly allowed the same. Feeling aggrieved with the impugned order passed

NISH DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT - CC -6(3), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee except ITA

ITA 3129/MUM/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Mar 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Ram Lal Negi

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Joshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri P.C. Chhotaray
Section 132(4)

section 132(4) of the Act stated that cash was received from Mr. Parag Vora. Considering these evidences, the Assessing Officer considered all the purchases made from Krishna Structure Pvt. Ltd as bogus and made disallowance under section 37 of the Act as under

NISH DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT- CC- 6(3), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee except ITA

ITA 3131/MUM/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Mar 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Ram Lal Negi

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Joshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri P.C. Chhotaray
Section 132(4)

section 132(4) of the Act stated that cash was received from Mr. Parag Vora. Considering these evidences, the Assessing Officer considered all the purchases made from Krishna Structure Pvt. Ltd as bogus and made disallowance under section 37 of the Act as under