JINDAL DRUGS LTD,MUMBAI vs. M/S. ACIT CEN CIR-8, MUMBAI
In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed in part whereas the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed
ITA 2592/MUM/2008[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Oct 2015AY 2005-2006
Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma & Shri Sandeep Gosainassessment Year: - 2005-06 Jindal Drugs Limited Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Bakhtawar, 6Th Floor, B&C, Income Tax, Central Circel 229, Nariman Point, – 8 Aaykar Bhavan, Mumbai – 400 021. M.K. Road, Mumbai – 400 020. Appellant Respondent Pan/Gir No. Aaacj1000A Assessment Year: - 2005-06 The Asst. Commissioner Of Vs.` Jindal Drugs Limited Bakhtawar, 6Th Floor, B&C, Income Tax, Central Circel – 8 229, Nariman Point, Old Cgo Bldg, Annexe, Mumbai – 400 021. M.K. Road, Mumbai – 400 020. Pan/Gir No. Aaacj1000A Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: - 2006-07 Jindal Drugs Limited Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Bakhtawar, 6Th Floor, Income Tax, Central Circel – 8, B&C, Aaykar Bhavan, 229, Nariman Point, M.K. Road, Mumbai – 400 020. Mumbai – 400 021. Pan/Gir No. Aaacj1000A Appellant Respondent
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(iii)Section 80Section 80I
80I of the Act.
(i)
CIT Vs. Eltek SGS (P) Ltd. – (2008) 300- ITR -6 (Del).
(ii)
CIT vs. Dharam Pal Prem Chand ltd. – (2009) 221-CTR -133
(iii) Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Vs. CIT (2009) –
TIOL 02-HC-Del.-IT (iv)
Shah Originals – 112 TTJ 754 (Mum Trib):
(v)
ITO Vs. Kiran Enterprises – 92- TTJ-104 (Chd.); and (vi)
Saraf
