BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 80Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Ahmedabad20Bangalore11Delhi6Visakhapatnam3Mumbai3Surat2Calcutta1Patna1Pune1Jaipur1

Key Topics

Section 56(2)(viib)3Addition to Income2

DY CIT. CIRCLE-1, THANE vs. M/S TRAVECOM GLOBAL P. LTD., BHAYANDER

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 59/MUM/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Bledcit – Circle 1 V. M/S. Travecom Global Pvt. Ltd., Room No. 22, B-Wing B/607, Krishnakunj 6Th Floor, Ashar I.T. Park Salasar Brij Bhoomi Wagle Industrial Estate Bhayander (W)-401101 Thane (W)-400604 Pan: Aaect8729Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Ms. Aarti Vissanji Department By : Shri B.K. Bagchi

For Appellant: Ms. Aarti VissanjiFor Respondent: Shri B.K. Bagchi
Section 143(2)Section 56(2)(viib)

68 are in the nature of anti-abuse measures aimed at preventing the mala fide transactions intended to avoid tax liability and to tackle the problem of black money and were never intended to be made applicable on genuine, bona fide and purely commercial transactions. To substantiate the same the assessee relies on the following board circulars and judicial precedents

MANISH KUMUDCHANDRA METHA ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-19(2)(3), MUMBAI

ITA 2410/MUM/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Nov 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singhassessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Krishna Kumar, D.R
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68

80E, Napeansea Road, Grant Road, Mumbai – 400 006 Mumbai – 400 007 PAN: AADPM9184G (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Krishna Kumar, D.R. Date of Hearing : 15 . 11 . 2022 Date of Pronouncement : 22 . 11 . 2022 O R D E R Per : Kuldip Singh, Judicial Member: The appellant, Shri Manish Kumudchandra Mehta (hereinafter referred to as ‘the assessee

ASST CIT (LTU) 2, MUMBAI vs. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 1547/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri B.R.Baskaran (Am) & Amarjit Singh (Jm)

Section 43B

sections, the same profits shall not be allowed as a deduction under any other provision of this Act for the same assessment year and that in any case the deduction shall not exceed the profits and gains of the eligible undertaking or unit or enterprise or business, as the case may be. Even if Section 10A/Section