BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

18 results for “section 68”+ Section 194Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai18Delhi3Hyderabad2Kolkata2Pune1

Key Topics

Section 194D52Section 201(1)41Section 194J21Deduction17TDS17Section 133A16Survey u/s 133A16Section 20113Section 194C12Section 194I3Section 1313Addition to Income2

DCIT (TDS) 3(2), MUMBAI vs. RELIANCE LIFE NSURANACE CO. LTD, MUMBAI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 3011/MUM/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 May 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra B. SanghaviFor Respondent: Shri Pradeep Singh, DR
Section 131Section 133ASection 194CSection 194DSection 194ISection 194JSection 201(1)

194D, the TDS is deducted on the amount of commission paid or payable to agents, excluding the service tax which is as per the Service Tax Regulations (Finance Act, 1994). He also discussed the provisions of section 68

DCIT (TDS) 3(2), MUMBAI vs. RELIANCE LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD, MUMBAI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 3010/MUM/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 May 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra B. SanghaviFor Respondent: Shri Pradeep Singh, DR
Section 131Section 133ASection 194CSection 194DSection 194ISection 194JSection 201(1)

194D, the TDS is deducted on the amount of commission paid or payable to agents, excluding the service tax which is as per the Service Tax Regulations (Finance Act, 1994). He also discussed the provisions of section 68

DCIT (TDS) 3(2), MUMBAI vs. RELIANCE LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD, MUMBAI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 3009/MUM/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 May 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra B. SanghaviFor Respondent: Shri Pradeep Singh, DR
Section 131Section 133ASection 194CSection 194DSection 194ISection 194JSection 201(1)

194D, the TDS is deducted on the amount of commission paid or payable to agents, excluding the service tax which is as per the Service Tax Regulations (Finance Act, 1994). He also discussed the provisions of section 68

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR 1(3)(1), INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT vs. SKATE TRADES AND AGENCIES PRIVATE LIMITED , RAICHUR STREET MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1663/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiyashri Sandeep Singh Karhaildy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(3)(1), Room No.535, Aayakar Bhawan, M.K. Road, Churchgate ............... Appellant Mumbai - 400020

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Bhangepatil Pushkaraj, Sr.DR
Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250

194D, the rate or rates of income-tax specified in this behalf in the Finance Act of the relevant year ; (iii) for the purposes of deduction of tax under section 194LBA or section 194LBB or section 194LBC or section 195, the rate or rates of income-tax specified in this behalf in the Finance

A.C.I.T.(TDS)-3(2), MUMBAI vs. SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD., MUMBAI

In the result ground taken by Revenue in all the years under consideration are dismissed

ITA 6946/MUM/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma() & Shri Amarjit Singh ()

For Appellant: Shri. F.V. IraniFor Respondent: Shri. Bruseth
Section 133ASection 194DSection 201Section 201(1)

194D of the Act. The assesse has already deducted tax at source under section 194C, accordingly there is no justification in the order of lower authorities holding the assessee in default under section 201(1) & (1A). 9. In the result ground taken by assessee in all the years under consideration are allowed. 10. In the appeal filed

A.C.I.T.(TDS)-3(2), MUMBAI vs. SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD., MUMBAI

In the result ground taken by Revenue in all the years under consideration are dismissed

ITA 6945/MUM/2012[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma() & Shri Amarjit Singh ()

For Appellant: Shri. F.V. IraniFor Respondent: Shri. Bruseth
Section 133ASection 194DSection 201Section 201(1)

194D of the Act. The assesse has already deducted tax at source under section 194C, accordingly there is no justification in the order of lower authorities holding the assessee in default under section 201(1) & (1A). 9. In the result ground taken by assessee in all the years under consideration are allowed. 10. In the appeal filed

ACIT (TDS) 3(2), MUMBAI vs. SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO.LTD, MUMBAI

In the result ground taken by Revenue in all the years under consideration are dismissed

ITA 7329/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma() & Shri Amarjit Singh ()

For Appellant: Shri. F.V. IraniFor Respondent: Shri. Bruseth
Section 133ASection 194DSection 201Section 201(1)

194D of the Act. The assesse has already deducted tax at source under section 194C, accordingly there is no justification in the order of lower authorities holding the assessee in default under section 201(1) & (1A). 9. In the result ground taken by assessee in all the years under consideration are allowed. 10. In the appeal filed

SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TDS) 3(2), MUMBAI

In the result ground taken by Revenue in all the years under consideration are dismissed

ITA 6492/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma() & Shri Amarjit Singh ()

For Appellant: Shri. F.V. IraniFor Respondent: Shri. Bruseth
Section 133ASection 194DSection 201Section 201(1)

194D of the Act. The assesse has already deducted tax at source under section 194C, accordingly there is no justification in the order of lower authorities holding the assessee in default under section 201(1) & (1A). 9. In the result ground taken by assessee in all the years under consideration are allowed. 10. In the appeal filed

SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TDS) 3(2), MUMBAI

In the result ground taken by Revenue in all the years under consideration are dismissed

ITA 6493/MUM/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma() & Shri Amarjit Singh ()

For Appellant: Shri. F.V. IraniFor Respondent: Shri. Bruseth
Section 133ASection 194DSection 201Section 201(1)

194D of the Act. The assesse has already deducted tax at source under section 194C, accordingly there is no justification in the order of lower authorities holding the assessee in default under section 201(1) & (1A). 9. In the result ground taken by assessee in all the years under consideration are allowed. 10. In the appeal filed

A.C.I.T.(TDS)-3(2), MUMBAI vs. SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD., MUMBAI

In the result ground taken by Revenue in all the years under consideration are dismissed

ITA 6943/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma() & Shri Amarjit Singh ()

For Appellant: Shri. F.V. IraniFor Respondent: Shri. Bruseth
Section 133ASection 194DSection 201Section 201(1)

194D of the Act. The assesse has already deducted tax at source under section 194C, accordingly there is no justification in the order of lower authorities holding the assessee in default under section 201(1) & (1A). 9. In the result ground taken by assessee in all the years under consideration are allowed. 10. In the appeal filed

A.C.I.T.(TDS)-3(2), MUMBAI vs. SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD., MUMBAI

In the result ground taken by Revenue in all the years under consideration are dismissed

ITA 6944/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma() & Shri Amarjit Singh ()

For Appellant: Shri. F.V. IraniFor Respondent: Shri. Bruseth
Section 133ASection 194DSection 201Section 201(1)

194D of the Act. The assesse has already deducted tax at source under section 194C, accordingly there is no justification in the order of lower authorities holding the assessee in default under section 201(1) & (1A). 9. In the result ground taken by assessee in all the years under consideration are allowed. 10. In the appeal filed

ACIT (TDS) 3(2), MUMBAI vs. SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO.LTD, MUMBAI

In the result ground taken by Revenue in all the years under consideration are dismissed

ITA 7328/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma() & Shri Amarjit Singh ()

For Appellant: Shri. F.V. IraniFor Respondent: Shri. Bruseth
Section 133ASection 194DSection 201Section 201(1)

194D of the Act. The assesse has already deducted tax at source under section 194C, accordingly there is no justification in the order of lower authorities holding the assessee in default under section 201(1) & (1A). 9. In the result ground taken by assessee in all the years under consideration are allowed. 10. In the appeal filed

ACIT (TDS) 3(2), MUMBAI vs. SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO.LTD, MUMBAI

In the result ground taken by Revenue in all the years under consideration are dismissed

ITA 7330/MUM/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma() & Shri Amarjit Singh ()

For Appellant: Shri. F.V. IraniFor Respondent: Shri. Bruseth
Section 133ASection 194DSection 201Section 201(1)

194D of the Act. The assesse has already deducted tax at source under section 194C, accordingly there is no justification in the order of lower authorities holding the assessee in default under section 201(1) & (1A). 9. In the result ground taken by assessee in all the years under consideration are allowed. 10. In the appeal filed

SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT (TDS) 3(2), MUMBAI

In the result ground taken by Revenue in all the years under consideration are dismissed

ITA 7415/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma() & Shri Amarjit Singh ()

For Appellant: Shri. F.V. IraniFor Respondent: Shri. Bruseth
Section 133ASection 194DSection 201Section 201(1)

194D of the Act. The assesse has already deducted tax at source under section 194C, accordingly there is no justification in the order of lower authorities holding the assessee in default under section 201(1) & (1A). 9. In the result ground taken by assessee in all the years under consideration are allowed. 10. In the appeal filed

SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT (TDS) 3(2), MUMBAI

In the result ground taken by Revenue in all the years under consideration are dismissed

ITA 7416/MUM/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma() & Shri Amarjit Singh ()

For Appellant: Shri. F.V. IraniFor Respondent: Shri. Bruseth
Section 133ASection 194DSection 201Section 201(1)

194D of the Act. The assesse has already deducted tax at source under section 194C, accordingly there is no justification in the order of lower authorities holding the assessee in default under section 201(1) & (1A). 9. In the result ground taken by assessee in all the years under consideration are allowed. 10. In the appeal filed

SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT (TDS) 3(2), MUMBAI

In the result ground taken by Revenue in all the years under consideration are dismissed

ITA 7417/MUM/2012[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma() & Shri Amarjit Singh ()

For Appellant: Shri. F.V. IraniFor Respondent: Shri. Bruseth
Section 133ASection 194DSection 201Section 201(1)

194D of the Act. The assesse has already deducted tax at source under section 194C, accordingly there is no justification in the order of lower authorities holding the assessee in default under section 201(1) & (1A). 9. In the result ground taken by assessee in all the years under consideration are allowed. 10. In the appeal filed

SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TDS) 3(2), MUMBAI

In the result ground taken by Revenue in all the years under consideration are dismissed

ITA 6494/MUM/2012[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma() & Shri Amarjit Singh ()

For Appellant: Shri. F.V. IraniFor Respondent: Shri. Bruseth
Section 133ASection 194DSection 201Section 201(1)

194D of the Act. The assesse has already deducted tax at source under section 194C, accordingly there is no justification in the order of lower authorities holding the assessee in default under section 201(1) & (1A). 9. In the result ground taken by assessee in all the years under consideration are allowed. 10. In the appeal filed

DCIT (TDS) 2(2), MUMBAI vs. SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD, MUMBAI

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2398/MUM/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Sept 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment Year: 2011-12 Dcit-(Tds)-2(2), M/S Sbi Life Insurance Room No.1012, 10Th Floor, Company Ltd. “Natraj”, 5Th बनाम/ Smt. K.G. Mittal Ayurvedic Floor, M.V. Road & Western Vs. Hospital Building, Express High Way Charni Road, Junction, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400020 Mumbai-400069 (राज"व /Revenue) ("नधा"रती /Assessee) Pan. No. Aafcs2503P

Section 194Section 194DSection 68(2)

194D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the Act) by holding that the service tax liability, in the hands of the assessee, is not income of the agents and no TDS is liable to be deductible on the income without appreciating the facts mentioned in order under section. 201 (1) of the Act and Circular No.4/2008 dated