KASHYAP KANIYALAL MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC-4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, in the case of a person where a search is initiated under section 132 or books of account, other documents or any assets are requisitioned under section 132A after the 31st day of May, 2003 [but on or before the 31st day of March, 2021], the Assessing Officer shall

KASHYAP KANIYALAL MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC-4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, in the case of a person where a search is initiated under section 132 or books of account, other documents or any assets are requisitioned under section 132A after the 31st day of May, 2003 [but on or before the 31st day of March, 2021], the Assessing Officer shall

KASHYAP KANIYALAL MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC-4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, in the case of a person where a search is initiated under section 132 or books of account, other documents or any assets are requisitioned under section 132A after the 31st day of May, 2003 [but on or before the 31st day of March, 2021], the Assessing Officer shall

KASHYAP KANIYALAL MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC-4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, in the case of a person where a search is initiated under section 132 or books of account, other documents or any assets are requisitioned under section 132A after the 31st day of May, 2003 [but on or before the 31st day of March, 2021], the Assessing Officer shall

KASHYAP KANIYALAL MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC-4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, in the case of a person where a search is initiated under section 132 or books of account, other documents or any assets are requisitioned under section 132A after the 31st day of May, 2003 [but on or before the 31st day of March, 2021], the Assessing Officer shall

INCOME TAX OFFICER-12(3)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. MANJU DIAMONDS PVT. LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes whereas the application under Rule 27 of statistical purposes whereas the application under Rule 27

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan () Assessment Year: 2017-18 Ito-12(3)(1), Manju Diamonds Pvt. Ltd., R.No. 145, 1St Floor, Aayakar 57/59, 1St Floor, Nagdevi Street, Vs. Bhavan, M.K. Road, Maszid Bunder, Mumbai-400020. Mumbai-400 003. Pan No. Aaecm 6609 G Appellant Respondent

reassessment completed u/s 147 of the Act is concerned, before the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee Ld. CIT(A), the assessee referred to the provisions of section 153C of referred to the provisions of section 153C of the Act and submitted that information was obtained from the the Act and submitted that information was obtained from

SHRI AMIT MANGILAL JAIN,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, - 33(1), MUMBAI

In the result, both the above appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

u/s 133A of the Act were refereed in the assessment order. 6.2 For ready reference we quote section 153C as under:- " 153C. [Notwithstanding anything contained in section 139, section 147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that,- (a) any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing, seized or requisitioned

D G LAND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -4(4), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh ()

reassessment proceedings u/s 153C of the Act for assessment year 2013-14 to proceedings u/s 153C of the Act for assessment year 2013 proceedings u/s 153C of the Act for assessment year 2013 2016-17 and challenged the addition on merit in all the years 17 and challenged the addition on merit in all the years 17 and challenged

D G LAND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -4(4), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh ()

reassessment proceedings u/s 153C of the Act for assessment year 2013-14 to proceedings u/s 153C of the Act for assessment year 2013 proceedings u/s 153C of the Act for assessment year 2013 2016-17 and challenged the addition on merit in all the years 17 and challenged the addition on merit in all the years 17 and challenged

D G LAND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -4(4), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh ()

reassessment proceedings u/s 153C of the Act for assessment year 2013-14 to proceedings u/s 153C of the Act for assessment year 2013 proceedings u/s 153C of the Act for assessment year 2013 2016-17 and challenged the addition on merit in all the years 17 and challenged the addition on merit in all the years 17 and challenged

ATUL SHAMJI BHARANI,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC- 4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal by the assessee for the

1)(b) i.e.\nany information contained therein also does not apply in the case of the\nassessee. In such circumstances provisions of section 153C of the Act cannot\nbe invoked in the case of the assessee. Thus, the Assessing Officer has\ncorrectly invoked reassessment proceedings u/s 147

ATUL SHAMJI BHARANI,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC- 4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal by the assessee for the

1)(b) i.e.\nany information contained therein also does not apply in the case of the\nassessee. In such circumstances provisions of section 153C of the Act cannot\nbe invoked in the case of the assessee. Thus, the Assessing Officer has\ncorrectly invoked reassessment proceedings u/s 147

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- 41(1)(1), MUMBAI, KAUTILYA BHAWAN, BKC vs. JAJ INTERNATIONAL, MUMBAI

In the result, the grounds relating to merit the file of the Ld

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh ()

147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, where the tion 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, where the tion 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that, Assessing Officer is satisfied that,— (a)any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing, seized or any money, bullion

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KAUTILYA BHAWAN vs. JAJ INTERNATIONAL, MUMBAI

In the result, the grounds relating to merit the file of the Ld

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh ()

147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, where the tion 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, where the tion 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that, Assessing Officer is satisfied that,— (a)any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing, seized or any money, bullion

JCIT CENT. CIR. - 1(4), MUMBAI vs. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD, MUMBAI

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed whereas appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2010-11 Grasim Industries Limited, The Dcit Cc-1(4), Corporate Finance Division, Room No. 902, 9Th Floor, Old Vs. A-2, Aditya Birla Centre, S.K. Cgo Building, M.K. Road, Ahire Marg, Worli, Mumbai-400020. Mumbai-400030. Pan No. Aaacg 4464 B Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2010-11 Jcit (Osd), Central Circle- Grasim Industries Limited, 1(4), A-Wing, 2Nd Floor, Aditya Room No. 902, Pratishtha Vs. Birla Centre, S.K. Ahire Bhavan, 9Th Floor, Old Cgo Marg, Worli, Building Annexe, Mumbai-400030. Mumbai-400020. Pan No. Aaacg 4464 B Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Yogesh Thar & Mr. Chaitanya Joshi Revenue By : Dr. Kishor Dhule, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 03/04/2024 : Date Of Pronouncement 29/04/2024

1) specifies that any assessment or reassessment falling with the period of six that any assessment or reassessment falling with the period of six that any assessment or reassessment falling with the period of six assessment years pending on the date of initiation of search under assessment years pending on the date of initiation of search under assessment years pending

DINESH SHAH (HUF) ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIR-3(4) , MUMBAI

In the result, all four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail () Assessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12 & Assessment Year: 2012-13 & Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dinesh Shah (Huf), Dy. Cit, Central Circle-3(4), Flat No. 434, Shabri Shikhar, Mumbai. Vs. R.C. Marg, Chembur (W), Mumbai-400071. Pan No. Aadhs 0544 N Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Rasesh Shah : Ms. Sanyogita Nagpal, Cit-Dr Revenue By Date Of Hearing : 15/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 13/03/2024 Order

reassessment proceedings completed u/s 153C of the Act. The relevant additional proceedings completed u/s 153C of the Act. The relevant additional proceedings completed u/s 153C of the Act. The relevant additional ground is reproduced as under: ground is reproduced as under:  On the facts and On the facts and in circumstances of the case as well as law in circumstances

DINESH SHAH (HUF),MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIR, MUMBAI

In the result, all four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail () Assessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12 & Assessment Year: 2012-13 & Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dinesh Shah (Huf), Dy. Cit, Central Circle-3(4), Flat No. 434, Shabri Shikhar, Mumbai. Vs. R.C. Marg, Chembur (W), Mumbai-400071. Pan No. Aadhs 0544 N Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Rasesh Shah : Ms. Sanyogita Nagpal, Cit-Dr Revenue By Date Of Hearing : 15/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 13/03/2024 Order

reassessment proceedings completed u/s 153C of the Act. The relevant additional proceedings completed u/s 153C of the Act. The relevant additional proceedings completed u/s 153C of the Act. The relevant additional ground is reproduced as under: ground is reproduced as under:  On the facts and On the facts and in circumstances of the case as well as law in circumstances

DINESH SHAH (HUF),MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIR -3(4), MUMBAI

In the result, all four appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail () Assessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12 & Assessment Year: 2012-13 & Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dinesh Shah (Huf), Dy. Cit, Central Circle-3(4), Flat No. 434, Shabri Shikhar, Mumbai. Vs. R.C. Marg, Chembur (W), Mumbai-400071. Pan No. Aadhs 0544 N Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Rasesh Shah : Ms. Sanyogita Nagpal, Cit-Dr Revenue By Date Of Hearing : 15/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 13/03/2024 Order

reassessment proceedings completed u/s 153C of the Act. The relevant additional proceedings completed u/s 153C of the Act. The relevant additional proceedings completed u/s 153C of the Act. The relevant additional ground is reproduced as under: ground is reproduced as under:  On the facts and On the facts and in circumstances of the case as well as law in circumstances