H.K. ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT CC - 2(4), MUMBAI

In the result, all the eight appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

147. Thereafter, AO has not brought any evidence or made any inquiry that assessee has earned additional income of Rs.5 lakhs as brokerage income. In the instant case, after reopening the assessment order, the AO had not made any inquiry and not examined the material which was before him that how this income was declared by the assessee and addition

H.K. ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT - CC-2(4), MUMBAI

In the result, all the eight appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

147. Thereafter, AO has not brought any evidence or made any inquiry that assessee has earned additional income of Rs.5 lakhs as brokerage income. In the instant case, after reopening the assessment order, the AO had not made any inquiry and not examined the material which was before him that how this income was declared by the assessee and addition

H.K. ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-2(4), MUMBAI

In the result, all the eight appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

147. Thereafter, AO has not brought any evidence or made any inquiry that assessee has earned additional income of Rs.5 lakhs as brokerage income. In the instant case, after reopening the assessment order, the AO had not made any inquiry and not examined the material which was before him that how this income was declared by the assessee and addition

H.K. ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT-CC-2(4), MUMBAI

In the result, all the eight appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

147. Thereafter, AO has not brought any evidence or made any inquiry that assessee has earned additional income of Rs.5 lakhs as brokerage income. In the instant case, after reopening the assessment order, the AO had not made any inquiry and not examined the material which was before him that how this income was declared by the assessee and addition

H.K.ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), MUMBAI

In the result, all the eight appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

147. Thereafter, AO has not brought any evidence or made any inquiry that assessee has earned additional income of Rs.5 lakhs as brokerage income. In the instant case, after reopening the assessment order, the AO had not made any inquiry and not examined the material which was before him that how this income was declared by the assessee and addition

NSE IT LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 8(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.5935/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2005-06) बिाम/ M/S. Nse. It Ltd, Dcit 8(2), Mumbai Trade Globe, Ground Floor, Andheri Kurla Road, V. Andheri (E), Mumbai 400059 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan : Aabcn0159P (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

addition made by the Id A.O to the total income as declared in return of income filed in response to notice u/s. 148 of the act and before receiving the reasons for reopening (ii) The conduct of the assessee was bonafide as it has suo-moto rectified the mistake in the return of income filed in response to notice u/s

ACIT, CIR-1(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S. CHERYL ADVISORY PVT LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry () Assessment Year: 2013-14

u/s 147 of the Act on the ground of borrowed satisfaction. The assessee 147 of the Act on the ground of borrowed satisfaction. The assessee 147 of the Act on the ground of borrowed satisfaction. The assessee also challenged addition on merit. The Ld. CIT(A) in the impugned also challenged addition on merit

CORAL VENTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 12(1)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail () Assessment Year: 2010-11

income within th meaning of section 147 of the Act. Hence the entire Reassessment meaning of section 147 of the Act. Hence the entire Reassessment meaning of section 147 of the Act. Hence the entire Reassessment proceedings are liable to be annulled and quashed. proceedings are liable to be annulled and quashed. 6. On the facts and circumstances

VALIANT GLASS WORKS P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 38, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sri G. S. Pannu & Sri Sanjay Gargvaliant Glass Works Pvt. Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Ltd., C/O. Shankarlal Jain & Income Tax, Associates, 12, Engineer Central Circle-38, Mumbai Building, 265, Princess Street, Mumbai 400 002 Pan:Aaacv 1224 E Appellant .. Respondent

reassessment proceedings which stood abated and pass fresh order u/s 153A. 3. If the initiation of the reopening of the assessment u/s 147 is held to be illegal or nullity in the eyes of law, then, whether the AO still could take into consideration the information relating to the issues which were the subject matter such proceedings u/s 147

MR NILESH BHARANI,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 4(1), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Shri Amarjit Singh, Am आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 612/Mum/2020 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12)

income, then records satisfaction by way of a note u/s 153C of the Act, issues a notice u/s 153C to file a return of income for reassessment, then he makes an assessment / reassessment of such income u/s 153A of the Act. 65. Now, the entire procedure is the same except under different sections having two separate contingencies. In our opinion

M/S. GUJARAT REALTORS (FIRM),BHAYANDER vs. DCIT, CC-1, THANE

In the result, the appeal for assessment year 2009

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Ita Nos. 3523 To 3525/Mum/2023 Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2012-13, 2013-14 M/S Gujarat Realtors, Dy. Cit Central Circle-1, Ground Floor, Samriddhi, Room No. 10, 6Th Floor, Ashar Annapurna Estate, Indralok, Vs. It Park, Wagle Industrial Godhbunder Link Road, Thane, Estate, Thane (W)-400604. Bhayander, 401105. Pan No. Aahfg 0051 C Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Anuj Kisnadwala Revenue By : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 16/04/2024 : Date Of Pronouncement 30/05/2024

income at Rs.1,10,23,320/ s.1,10,23,320/-. On further appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) sustained part of the additions. further appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) sustained part of the additions. further appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) sustained part of the additions. M/s Gujarat Realtors 3 ITA Nos. 3523 to 3525/Mum/2023 ITA Nos. 3523 to 3525/Mum/2023 4. Aggrieved

M/S GUJARAT REALTORES,MUMBAI SUBURBAN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, THANE, THANE

In the result, the appeal for assessment year 2009

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Ita Nos. 3523 To 3525/Mum/2023 Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2012-13, 2013-14 M/S Gujarat Realtors, Dy. Cit Central Circle-1, Ground Floor, Samriddhi, Room No. 10, 6Th Floor, Ashar Annapurna Estate, Indralok, Vs. It Park, Wagle Industrial Godhbunder Link Road, Thane, Estate, Thane (W)-400604. Bhayander, 401105. Pan No. Aahfg 0051 C Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Anuj Kisnadwala Revenue By : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 16/04/2024 : Date Of Pronouncement 30/05/2024

income at Rs.1,10,23,320/ s.1,10,23,320/-. On further appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) sustained part of the additions. further appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) sustained part of the additions. further appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) sustained part of the additions. M/s Gujarat Realtors 3 ITA Nos. 3523 to 3525/Mum/2023 ITA Nos. 3523 to 3525/Mum/2023 4. Aggrieved

M/S GUJARAT REALTORES ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, , THANE

In the result, the appeal for assessment year 2009

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Ita Nos. 3523 To 3525/Mum/2023 Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2012-13, 2013-14 M/S Gujarat Realtors, Dy. Cit Central Circle-1, Ground Floor, Samriddhi, Room No. 10, 6Th Floor, Ashar Annapurna Estate, Indralok, Vs. It Park, Wagle Industrial Godhbunder Link Road, Thane, Estate, Thane (W)-400604. Bhayander, 401105. Pan No. Aahfg 0051 C Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Anuj Kisnadwala Revenue By : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 16/04/2024 : Date Of Pronouncement 30/05/2024

income at Rs.1,10,23,320/ s.1,10,23,320/-. On further appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) sustained part of the additions. further appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) sustained part of the additions. further appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) sustained part of the additions. M/s Gujarat Realtors 3 ITA Nos. 3523 to 3525/Mum/2023 ITA Nos. 3523 to 3525/Mum/2023 4. Aggrieved

GOVIND AGARWAL. HUF,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CEN CIR 32, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee’s are allowed in part, in terms indicated hereinabove, whereas the Revenue’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am & Shri Sanjay Garg, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.4531,4566,876,877,878/Mum/2011 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08, 2002-03, 2003-04 & 2005-06) Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai Vs. Manidevi Agarwal, 720, A- 1, Lok Bharti Chs Ltd., Marol Maroshi Road, Marol, Andheri(E), Mumbai- 400059 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aakpa 4962 H .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.4528/Mum/2011 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2007-08) Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai Vs. Shri Govind Agarwal, 701, A-1, Lok Bharti Chs Ltd., Marol Maroshi Road, Marol, Andheri(E), Mumbai- 400059 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Adopa 4038 K .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.873,874/Mum/2011 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2003-04 & 2004-05) Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai Vs. Shri Govind Agarwal(Huf), 720/A-5, Lok Bharti Chs Ltd., Marol Maroshi Road, Marol, Andheri(E), Mumbai- 400059 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aiepa 3109 A .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) 876,828,4566,4547,218/11 &957/13&Co203.13

reassess the total income but there is a cap on the scope of additions in such assessment, being the items of income 'unearthed during the search'. In other words, the determination of 'total income' in respect of the assessment years for which the assessments are already completed on the date of search, shall not be influenced by the items

AMBUJA CEMENT INDIA P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CIR 3(1), MUMBAI

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed as indicated above

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.2600/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2005-06)

income after making additions by the AO as found mentioned in the said assessment order dated 26.11.2007 passed by the AO u/s 143(3) of the 1961 Act , read as under:- “Income from Business Net profit as per Profit & Loss A/c Rs.10,17,67,466 I.T.A. No.2600/Mum/2014 Add: Expenses disallowable/considered Separately: 1. Donation Rs. 50,000 2. Depreciation

NALIN P. CHOKSEY,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIR 45, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1769/Mum/2011 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2002-03) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1770/Mum/2011 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2004-05) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1771/Mum/2011 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1772/Mum/2011 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1773/Mum/2011 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2003-04) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1774/Mum/2011 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07) Mr. Nalin P. Choksey, बनाम/ The. Dy. Cit, Krishna Villa, Central Circle 45, V. Linking Road, Aayakar Bhavan, Santacruz (W), Mumbai – 400 020. Mumbai – 400 054. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan :Aabpc0675L (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent) Assessee By Shri Hari S. Raheja Respondent By : Shri Gulshan Raj सुनवाई क" तार"ख /Date Of Hearing : 19-11-2015 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 11-12-2015

reassess' to completed assessment proceedings. vi. Insofar as pending assessments are concerned, the jurisdiction to make the original assessment and the assessment under Section 153A merges into one. Only one assessment shall be made separately for each AY on the basis of the findings of the search and any other material existing or brought on the record

KASHYAP KANIYALAL MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC-4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

reassessment orders passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) read with section 147 for the AY 2011-12 and u/s 153A r.ws. 143(3) for the later Assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 to 2017-18 and u/s 143(3) for the AY 2018-19 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 have been upheld. Since common issues permeate

KASHYAP KANIYALAL MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC-4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

reassessment orders passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) read with section 147 for the AY 2011-12 and u/s 153A r.ws. 143(3) for the later Assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 to 2017-18 and u/s 143(3) for the AY 2018-19 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 have been upheld. Since common issues permeate