BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15 results for “reassessment”+ Section 72Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai15Chennai10Ahmedabad5Kolkata4Pune2Bangalore2Hyderabad2Jaipur2Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)41Section 26321Section 14715Reassessment10Deduction9Section 115J8Section 35D8Addition to Income7Disallowance7Section 80I

DCIT 1(2), MUMBAI vs. NOCIL LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3529/MUM/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 May 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri G.S.Pannu & Shri Amarjit Singhthe Dcit 1(2), Room No.535, 5Th Floor, Aaykar Bhavan,M.K.Road, Mumbai 400 020 ...... Appellant Vs. M/S. Nocil Limited, Mafatlal House, 3Rd Floor, Ht Parekh Marg, Backbay Reclamation, Mumbai -400 020 .... Respondent

For Appellant: Mrs. Arti VissanjiFor Respondent: Shri Rahul Raman
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 2Section 72A(4)

section 72A(4) of the Act on the ground that accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation pertaining to the PCD and PPD divisions could not be allowed to be carried forward and set-off in the hands of the assessee company. This has been effectuated by the Assessing Officer in the reassessment

6
Depreciation6
Section 263(2)5

HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,MUMBAI vs. PR. CIT-6, MUMBAI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 969/MUM/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2022AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri H. P. MahajaniFor Respondent: Shri Mehul Jain
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 263Section 263(2)

reassessment was passed by which the claim under section 72A came to be disallowed. The submission that has been urged

MANOHAR MANAK ALLOYS P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 4(2), MUMBAI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 1159/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Dec 2022AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Rajkumar SinghFor Respondent: Shri A.B. Koli
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263Section 263(1)

reassessment was passed by which the claim under section 16 Assessment Years: 2017-18 72A came to be disallowed. The submission

M/S. RAVI FOUNDATION ,MUMBAI vs. PR. CIT-17, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 884/MUM/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Apr 2022AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Ms. Arati AggarwalFor Respondent: Shri T. Shankar (Sr. AR)
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 263Section 263(2)

reassessment was passed by which the claim under Section 72A came to be disallowed. The submission that has been urged

THE TATA POWER COMPANY LTD,MUMBAI vs. PR CIT 2, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal is allowed, as indicated above

ITA 1307/MUM/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jul 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey () & Shri Rajesh Kumar ()

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 147Section 263Section 80I

reassessment was passed by which the claim under Section 72A came to be disallowed. The submission that has been urged

ROYAL WESTERN INDIA TURF CLUB,MUMBAI vs. PR. CIT -8, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal is allowed, as indicated above

ITA 640/MUM/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Oct 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey () & Shri Rajesh Kumar ()

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 263Section 263(2)

reassessment was passed by which the claim under Section 72A came to be disallowed. The submission that has been urged

JSW STEEL LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ADDLCIT, BANGALORE

858/M/2011

ITA 858/BANG/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Mar 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Amarjit Singh () Assessment Year: 2007-08 Jsw Steel Limited, The Addl. Cit, Range 11, Jindal Mansion, 5A, Vs. Bangalore. Dr. G. Deshmukh Marg, Mumbai-400026. Pan No. Aaacj 4323 N Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2007-08 Dc. Cc.46, M/S Jsw Steel Ltd., R.No. 659, 6Th Floor, Aayakar Vs. Jindal Mansion, 5-A, Dr. G Bhavan, M.K. Road, Deshmukh Marg, Mumbai-20. Mumbai-400026. Pan No. Aaacj 4323 N Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2007-08 M/S Jsw Steel Ltd., Dcit, Central Circle 46, Jsw Centre, Bandra Kurla Vs. 6Th Flr., Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Complex, Road, Mumbai-400051. Mumbai-400020. Pan No. Aaacj 4323 N Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Danesh Bafna &For Respondent: Mr. Achal Sharma, CIT-DR
Section 14ASection 37(1)

reassessment issued and served at the office of the assessee at Chagallu once again within the jurisdiction of the assessing authority. As a matter of fact, the Division Bench pointed out that the petitioner, the assessee in that case, had not taken any steps for transferring its file to Madras where its administrative office was situate and as the assessing

31 INFOTECHCONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD.,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT - 11(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1170/MUM/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Sept 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharshi () & Smt. Kavitha Rajagopal () 3I Infotech Consultancy Services Vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income- Limited, Tower No.5, 3Rd To 6Th Tax-11(3)(1), 4Th Floor, Aayakar Floors, International Infortech Park Bhavan, Mumbai Vashi, Navi Mumbai – 400 703 Pan : Aaacz3181E Appellant Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 2Section 250Section 72A

reassessment order passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Act, inspite of the fact that said assessment was reopened by issuing notice u/s. 148 of the Act on a non-existent company i.e, Delta Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. (amalgamated with 3i Infotech Consultancy Services Ltd.) without assigning any reasons for doing so which is wrong and contrary

AMBUJA CEMENT INDIA P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CIR 3(1), MUMBAI

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed as indicated above

ITA 2600/MUM/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Aug 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.2600/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2005-06)

For Appellant: Shri. Soumen Adak &For Respondent: Shri Satish Chandra Rajore
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 14ASection 234B

Section 147 which provides that the production before the AO of account books or other evidence from which material evidence could with due diligence have been discovered by the AO will not necessarily amount to disclosure. In the context, the AO also placed reliance onto the decisions in cases of Jawand Sons [(2010) 326 ITR 39 (P & H)], Consolidated Photo

SEQUENT SCIENTIFIC LTD,THANE vs. ASST CIT RG 3(3), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4902/MUM/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Jan 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri G.S.Pannu, Am & Shri Ravish Sood, Jm आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.4902/Mum/2013 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2009-10) Sequent Scientific Limited Asstt. Commissioner Of Income- बिधम/ 116, Vardhaman Industrial Tax Range-3(3), Aayakar Bhawan, Estate, Lbs Marg, Gokul Vs. Mumbai. Nagar, Thane 400 601. स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan/Gir No. Aaacv1501G (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी /Respondent) :

For Appellant: Shri H.P. Mahajani &For Respondent: Shri V.Vidyadhar, D.R
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 72A

section 72A. Your appellant reserves the right to add to, alter or amend the above ground if necessary.” The revenue on the other hand had challenged the order of the CIT(A) by raising before us the following effective grounds of appeal: “1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case

ULTRA TECH CEMENT LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT- CC 1(4), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 220/MUM/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon’Bledeputy Commissioner Of Income Tax V. M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd., Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9Th Floor 2Nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan, Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Osd) V. M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd. Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9Th Floor 2Nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) & M/S. Ultratech Cement Limited V. Dcit, Central Circle- 1(4) [Acit, Cc] Room. No 902, 9Th Floor Ahura Centre, B-Wing, 2Nd Floor Pratishtha Bhavan Mahakali Caves Road Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 Maharishi Karve Road Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 35D

reassessment proceedings. Elaborate arguments were advanced by both sides on these which are considered below: 48. Ground No. 3 of the assessee’s appeal relate to claim of deduction u/s 35DD of the Act. In this case, SCL which merged into the assessee Page No. 40 ITA NO. 1789 & 1466/MUM/2021 (A.Y: 2013-14) ITA NO. 222 & 220/MUM/2022

DCIT CIR 1(4) , MUMBAI vs. M/S. ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1789/MUM/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon’Bledeputy Commissioner Of Income Tax V. M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd., Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9Th Floor 2Nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan, Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Osd) V. M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd. Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9Th Floor 2Nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) & M/S. Ultratech Cement Limited V. Dcit, Central Circle- 1(4) [Acit, Cc] Room. No 902, 9Th Floor Ahura Centre, B-Wing, 2Nd Floor Pratishtha Bhavan Mahakali Caves Road Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 Maharishi Karve Road Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 35D

reassessment proceedings. Elaborate arguments were advanced by both sides on these which are considered below: 48. Ground No. 3 of the assessee’s appeal relate to claim of deduction u/s 35DD of the Act. In this case, SCL which merged into the assessee Page No. 40 ITA NO. 1789 & 1466/MUM/2021 (A.Y: 2013-14) ITA NO. 222 & 220/MUM/2022

JT. CIT (ODS) - CC -1(4), MUMBAI vs. ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 222/MUM/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon’Bledeputy Commissioner Of Income Tax V. M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd., Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9Th Floor 2Nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan, Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Osd) V. M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd. Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9Th Floor 2Nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) & M/S. Ultratech Cement Limited V. Dcit, Central Circle- 1(4) [Acit, Cc] Room. No 902, 9Th Floor Ahura Centre, B-Wing, 2Nd Floor Pratishtha Bhavan Mahakali Caves Road Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 Maharishi Karve Road Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 35D

reassessment proceedings. Elaborate arguments were advanced by both sides on these which are considered below: 48. Ground No. 3 of the assessee’s appeal relate to claim of deduction u/s 35DD of the Act. In this case, SCL which merged into the assessee Page No. 40 ITA NO. 1789 & 1466/MUM/2021 (A.Y: 2013-14) ITA NO. 222 & 220/MUM/2022

M/S. ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENT CIR-1(4) , MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1466/MUM/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon’Bledeputy Commissioner Of Income Tax V. M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd., Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9Th Floor 2Nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan, Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Osd) V. M/S. Ultratech Cement Ltd. Central Circle- 1(4) Ahura Centre, B- Wing Room No. 902, 9Th Floor 2Nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Pratishtha Bhavan Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent) & M/S. Ultratech Cement Limited V. Dcit, Central Circle- 1(4) [Acit, Cc] Room. No 902, 9Th Floor Ahura Centre, B-Wing, 2Nd Floor Pratishtha Bhavan Mahakali Caves Road Old C.G.O. Bldg, (Annexe) Andheri (E), Mumbai- 400093 Maharishi Karve Road Mumbai- 400020 Pan: Aaacl6442L (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 35D

reassessment proceedings. Elaborate arguments were advanced by both sides on these which are considered below: 48. Ground No. 3 of the assessee’s appeal relate to claim of deduction u/s 35DD of the Act. In this case, SCL which merged into the assessee Page No. 40 ITA NO. 1789 & 1466/MUM/2021 (A.Y: 2013-14) ITA NO. 222 & 220/MUM/2022

DCIT 6(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. CHARAK PHARMA P.LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 7117/MUM/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Jan 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Hon'Bledy. Commissioner Of Income Tax V. M/S. Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., Circle – 6(2)(1) 21, Evergreen Industrial Estate R.No. 563, Aayakar Bhavan Shakti Mill Lane, Opp. Dr. E. Moses Road Mahalaxmi, Mumbai – 400 011 M.K. Road, Mumbai – 400 020 Pan: Aabcc4014A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ronak G. Doshi & Ms. Niyanta Mehta Department By : Ms. Kavita P.Kaushik

For Appellant: Shri Ronak G. Doshi &For Respondent: Ms. Kavita P.Kaushik
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 72A

72A of the Act. 3 M/s. Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., 4. The re-assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act on 31.03.2015 making addition of ₹.31,200/- towards bogus purchases and further denying the adjustment of carry forward and setoff of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation relating to amalgamating company. The assessee challenged