Search: reassessment | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 54Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune6 Mumbai4 Kolkata2 Amritsar1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 6811 Section 14810 Section 69C6 Section 143(3)5 Section 270A5 Section 2504 Section 143(1)3 Addition to Income3 Section 1322

DCIT-14(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. HINDUSTAN DIAMOND COMPANY PVT. LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue bearing ITA 166/Mum/2024 is dismissed

ITA 166/MUM/2024[2020]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jul 2024

Bench: Shriamarjit Singh & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh JoshiFor Respondent: ShriP.D. Choughule (All.CIT) SR DR

Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 2Section 250Section 270ASection 270A(2)Section 270A(8)

reassessed has the effect income, both are positive; hence, this of reducing the loss or clause is not applicable to the Appellant. converting such loss into income. 5.6. From the above, it is clear that the case of appellant does not fit into any of the above clauses of section 270A(2) and thus it cannot be called that

SHAILY PRINCE GOYAL,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-27(3)(1), NAVI MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee Shri Yogesh Popatlal Thakkar in ITA No

ITA 4271/MUM/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 May 2024AY 2013-14

For Appellant: Dr. K Shivaram Sr. Advocate & Shashi BekalFor Respondent: Ms. Sujatha Iyangar SR AR

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250Section 68Section 69C

Reassessment proceedings under section 148 of the Act are bad in law as the due process of law is riot followed.\" The assessee's case was reopened under section 148 of the Act due to earning of capital gain amount of Rs.2,54,98,050/- during the impugned assessment year. After the verification, the addition was confirmed under section

MEENA HASMUKH SAVLA,MATUNGA MUMBAI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is\nallowed

ITA 2910/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Section 10Section 10(38)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 68

54E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was claimed. The Assessing Officer has held that neither the purchase nor sale of shares were genuine and that the amount of Rs.1,41,08,484/- stated to have been received by the\n\nassesse on sale of shares was undisclosed income and accordingly made addition under section 69\n\nHon'ble High

SHRI RAJESH RAMCHANDRA DAKE,PANVEL vs. DY CIT CC-1, MUMBAI

ITA 3/MUM/2021[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Jan 2025AY 2008-09

For Appellant: \nShri Rajesh Ramchandra DakeFor Respondent: \nDy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Section 10Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 250

reassess the total income, taking into consideration the incriminating material unearthed during the search and other material available with the AO including the income declared in the returns\" and as in the instant case the addition is based on the incriminating material such as the information qua selling of lands by the Assessee, found from the valuable group of cases