ABHISHEK JAYKETU JOSHI,MUMBAI vs. AC CIR-42(2)(1), MUMBAI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 5775/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Jan 2026AY 2019-20
Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokarabhishek Jayketu Joshi Ac Cir-42(2)(1), C-73, Venus Society, R. G. Kautilya Bhavan, Thadani Marg, Worli Sea Vs. Mumbai-400 051 Face, Mumbai-400 018 Pan/Gir No. Ackpj8583H (Applicant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri M. M. Golvala, Ld. Ar Revenue By Shri Surendra Mohan, Ld. Dr Date Of Hearing 07.01.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 13.01.2026
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 139(5)Section 143(1)Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250
29A, and that the requisite documentary evidences such as donation receipt and bank statement had been furnished.
5. The Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation furnished and, after obtaining approval of the specified authority, passed an order under section 148A(d), followed by issuance of notice under section 148 on 19.04.2023. In response, the assessee filed a return
