BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 24Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi20Mumbai3Surat2Bangalore2Jaipur2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Chennai1SC1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 2637Section 143(3)2Section 142(1)2Section 1482Deduction2

ESTATE OF LATE SHRI VRAJLAL CHANDULAL MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed

ITA 4252/MUM/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am)& Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

Section 132(4)Section 148

reassessment proceedings under section 34 of the Act and collected some additional tax from her. On March 17, 1962, the respondent, who is one of the daughters of Narayana Reddy and who had obtained a share in the estate of Narayana Reddy under the compromise decree referred to earlier, was served with notices under section 34of the Act seeking

RAGHULEELA ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED,BANDRA, MUMBAI vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), MUMBAI-3, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2595/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai
20 Aug 2024
AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Hon’Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri Madhur Agarwal, A/RFor Respondent: Smt. Sanyogita Nagpal, CIT, D/R
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 24BSection 263

24B of the Act on the ground that pre- I.T.A. No. 2595/Mum/2024 2 construction interest has to be allowed to the extent of the property which is acquired/constructed. 4. Representative of both the sides were heard at length, case records carefully perused and relevant documentary evidences brought on record, considered in the light of Rule 18(6) of the ITAT

RAGHULEELA ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED,BANDRA, MUMBAI vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), MUMBAI-3, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2594/MUM/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Aug 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Hon’Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri Madhur Agarwal, A/RFor Respondent: Smt. Sanyogita Nagpal, CIT, D/R
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

24B of the Act was disallowed for the period 01/10/2019 to 31/03/2020 and taking a leaf out of the same, the PCIT wanted to disallow the interest for the period up to 01/10/2019 in the case of Wadhwa & Associates Realtors Pvt. Ltd. 8.1. It would be pertinent to refer to the order of the ld. CIT(A)-53, Mumbai