BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,083 results for “reassessment”+ Section 144clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,233Mumbai1,083Chennai385Jaipur373Ahmedabad356Bangalore327Hyderabad264Kolkata258Pune193Raipur148Surat129Rajkot127Indore123Amritsar121Chandigarh120Visakhapatnam108Patna85Agra71Cuttack67Nagpur60Cochin55Lucknow54Guwahati47Jodhpur36Allahabad30Dehradun28Telangana25Panaji20Karnataka17SC16Ranchi15Jabalpur9Varanasi8Orissa3Calcutta3Rajasthan2Uttarakhand1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 148129Section 14791Addition to Income69Section 143(3)53Section 14449Reassessment35Reopening of Assessment31Section 6829Section 25028Disallowance

SHAKUNTALA KAMBLE (LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF PREMCHAND KAMBLE),THANE vs. DCIT -CENT. CIR `, THANE

ITA 1764/MUM/2021[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Aug 2023AY 2005-06
For Appellant: Shri Pravin TembhekarFor Respondent: Shri K.C. Selvamani
Section 142Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 153ASection 253(3)

reassessment orders passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of the Act for the Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09. Whereas, the 3 appeals preferred by the Revenue are cross-appeals pertain to the assessment order passed under Section 144

ACIT (CC) -8(2) , MUMBAI vs. M/S. HELIOS MERCANTILE LTD, MUMBAI

Showing 1–20 of 1,083 · Page 1 of 55

...
28
Section 69A23
Section 14A18
ITA 1742/MUM/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

144 of the act has\nbeen passed by the AO by taking approval from authority\ncompetent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.\"\n026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that\nhe has not decided whether approving authority has granted such\napprovals without application of mind or not. Before us the assessee

HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI

ITA 1306/MUM/2022[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2016-2017

144 of the act has\nbeen passed by the AO by taking approval from authority\ncompetent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.\"\n026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that\nhe has not decided whether approving authority has granted such\napprovals without application of mind or not. Before us the assessee

SHRIVALLABH PITTE INDUSTRIES LTD ,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRLE -6(1) , MUMBAI

ITA 1336/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

144 of the act has\nbeen passed by the AO by taking approval from authority\ncompetent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.\"\n026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that\nhe has not decided whether approving authority has granted such\napprovals without application of mind or not. Before us the assessee

ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI vs. HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED, MUMBAI

ITA 1741/MUM/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2016-17

144 of the act has\nbeen passed by the AO by taking approval from authority\ncompetent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.\"\n026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that\nhe has not decided whether approving authority has granted such\napprovals without application of mind or not. Before us the assessee

ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI vs. HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED, MUMBAI

ITA 1744/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

144 of the act has\nbeen passed by the AO by taking approval from authority\ncompetent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.\"\n026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that\nhe has not decided whether approving authority has granted such\napprovals without application of mind or not. Before us the assessee

HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI

ITA 1305/MUM/2022[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2018-2019

144 of the act has\nbeen passed by the AO by taking approval from authority\ncompetent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.\"\n026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that\nhe has not decided whether approving authority has granted such\napprovals without application of mind or not. Before us the assessee

HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI.

ITA 1302/MUM/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2017-2018

144 of the act has\nbeen passed by the AO by taking approval from authority\ncompetent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.\"\n026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that\nhe has not decided whether approving authority has granted such\napprovals without application of mind or not. Before us the assessee

SVP GLOBAL TEXTILES LTD FORMERLY SVP GLOBAL VENTURES LTD,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI MUMBAI, MUMBAI

ITA 1308/MUM/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2017-2018

144 of the act has\nbeen passed by the AO by taking approval from authority\ncompetent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.\"\n026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that\nhe has not decided whether approving authority has granted such\napprovals without application of mind or not. Before us the assessee

HELLIOS EXPORTS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-8(2), MUMBAI

ITA 1332/MUM/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2015-2016

144 of the act has\nbeen passed by the AO by taking approval from authority\ncompetent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.\"\n026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that\nhe has not decided whether approving authority has granted such\napprovals without application of mind or not. Before us the assessee

ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI vs. HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED, MUMBAI

ITA 1743/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

144 of the act has\nbeen passed by the AO by taking approval from authority\ncompetent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.\"\n\n026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that\nhe has not decided whether approving authority has granted such\napprovals without application of mind or not. Before

SHRIVALLABH PITTE INDUSTRIES LTD MUMBAI,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1),MUMBAI, MUMBAI

ITA 1335/MUM/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

144 of the act has\nbeen passed by the AO by taking approval from authority\ncompetent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.\"\n026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that\nhe has not decided whether approving authority has granted such\napprovals without application of mind or not. Before us the assessee

MANOHAR MANAK ALLOYS P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 4(2), MUMBAI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 1159/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Dec 2022AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Rajkumar SinghFor Respondent: Shri A.B. Koli
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263Section 263(1)

144. Section 2(40) which defines ‗regular assessment‘, was amended by the Finance Act, 1990, with effect from April 1, 1989, which corresponds to the amendment effected in section 143(1) of the Act. In other words, the procedure for assessment has been simplified so as to dispense with a regular assessment order to be passed by the Assessing Officer

ACIT (CC)-8(2) , MUMBAI vs. HELIOS EXPORTS LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 1734/MUM/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

144 of the act has been passed by the AO by taking approval from authority competent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.‖ 026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that he has not decided whether approving authority has granted such approvals without application of mind or not. Before us the assessee

SHRIVALLABH PITTIE INDUSTRIES LTD ,MUMBAI. vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI

ITA 1337/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

144 of the act has been passed by the AO by taking approval from authority competent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.‖ 026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that he has not decided whether approving authority has granted such approvals without application of mind or not. Before us the assessee

CITRON INFRAPROJECT LTD.,,MUMBAI-400005 vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI-400020

ITA 1268/MUM/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

144 of the act has been passed by the AO by taking approval from authority competent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.‖ 026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that he has not decided whether approving authority has granted such approvals without application of mind or not. Before us the assessee

SVP GLOBAL TEXTILES LTD FORMERLY SVP GLOBAL VENTURES LTD MUMBAI ,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI , MUMBAI

ITA 1313/MUM/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

144 of the act has been passed by the AO by taking approval from authority competent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.‖ 026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that he has not decided whether approving authority has granted such approvals without application of mind or not. Before us the assessee

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2)., MUMBAI vs. M/S CITRON INFRAPROJECTS LTD , MUMBAI

ITA 1569/MUM/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

144 of the act has been passed by the AO by taking approval from authority competent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.‖ 026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that he has not decided whether approving authority has granted such approvals without application of mind or not. Before us the assessee

ACIT (CC)-8(2) , MUMBAI vs. HELIOS EXPORTS LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 1735/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

144 of the act has been passed by the AO by taking approval from authority competent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.‖ 026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that he has not decided whether approving authority has granted such approvals without application of mind or not. Before us the assessee

SVP SOUTH WEST INDUSTRIES LTD. (FORMERLY, PLATINUM TEXTILE LTD.),MUMBAI-400005 vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8(2), MUMBAI

ITA 1272/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

144 of the act has been passed by the AO by taking approval from authority competent to grant approval under section 153D of the act.‖ 026. From the above decision of the learned CIT – A, it is apparent that he has not decided whether approving authority has granted such approvals without application of mind or not. Before us the assessee