BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “reassessment”+ Section 142A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh39Delhi26Agra14Jaipur13Chennai11Raipur8Mumbai8Nagpur7Lucknow6Pune5Patna4Indore3Bangalore3Surat1Ahmedabad1Visakhapatnam1Kolkata1Hyderabad1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 14819Section 14710Section 69C10Section 1519Section 143(3)7Reassessment7Reopening of Assessment6Addition to Income4Section 2503Section 50C

ITO-28(3)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. SATYA PRAKASH SINGH, MUMBAI

In the result, the ground so taken by the assessee so far as it relates to challenging the order of the AO as passed beyond the period of limitation is hereby allowed

ITA 3844/MUM/2025[2012]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Aug 2025

Bench: Justice (Retd.) Shri C.V. Bhadang & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav

For Appellant: Shri Rushabh MehtaFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kanti Datta, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 153Section 69C

142A and ending with the date on which the report of the Valuation Officer is received by the Assessing Officer; or (vi) the period (not exceeding sixty days) commencing from the date on which the Assessing Officer received the declaration under sub-section (1) of section 158A and ending with the date on which the order under sub-section

MR. SATYA PRAKASH SINGH,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD-28(3)(1), VASHI

3
Section 55A3
Natural Justice3

In the result, the ground so taken by the assessee so far as it relates to challenging the order of the AO as passed beyond the period of limitation is hereby allowed

ITA 3715/MUM/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Aug 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Justice (Retd.) Shri C.V. Bhadang & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav

For Appellant: Shri Rushabh MehtaFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kanti Datta, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 153Section 69C

142A and ending with the date on which the report of the Valuation Officer is received by the Assessing Officer; or (vi) the period (not exceeding sixty days) commencing from the date on which the Assessing Officer received the declaration under sub-section (1) of section 158A and ending with the date on which the order under sub-section

ITO 17 (2)(4), MUMBAI vs. NEUMEC BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 6423/MUM/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 May 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri S.D. PathakFor Respondent: Dr. Mahesh Akhade
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 28Section 50C

reassessment proceedings, a reference under section 142A(1) and section 142A(7) read with section 131(1)(d) was made

DCIT(LTU) - 1, MUMBAI vs. ACC LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3176/MUM/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Ble

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 55A

1. Assessee company filed return of income on 30.09.2009 declaring total income of Rs. 8,28,90,29,435/- under normal provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and book profit of Rs.17,47,50,13,208/- u/s.115JB. The assessee filed revised return of income on 14.10.2010 declaring total income of Rs.5,64,55,61,652/- under normal provisions

ACC LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT(LTU) - 1, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3135/MUM/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Ble

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 55A

1. Assessee company filed return of income on 30.09.2009 declaring total income of Rs. 8,28,90,29,435/- under normal provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and book profit of Rs.17,47,50,13,208/- u/s.115JB. The assessee filed revised return of income on 14.10.2010 declaring total income of Rs.5,64,55,61,652/- under normal provisions

ACC LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT(LTU) - 1, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3136/MUM/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Ble

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 55A

1. Assessee company filed return of income on 30.09.2009 declaring total income of Rs. 8,28,90,29,435/- under normal provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and book profit of Rs.17,47,50,13,208/- u/s.115JB. The assessee filed revised return of income on 14.10.2010 declaring total income of Rs.5,64,55,61,652/- under normal provisions

PANKAJ DHANDHARIA,MUMBAI vs. ACIT-22(1), MUMBAI

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 741/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Oct 2024AY 2017-18
Section 142ASection 144BSection 147Section 148Section 250Section 56(2)(vii)

reassessment order passed under\nsection 147 read with section 144B of The Income Tax Act, 1961\n(The Act) on 6/11/2023 by the National Faceless Assessment\nCentre (the learned AO) dated 6/11/2023, was dismissed.\n2. The assessee is aggrieved with the same and is in appeal before\nus raising following grounds.\n1.\nOn the facts and circumstances of the case

ACADEMY FOR GLOBAL EDUCATION SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ITO, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee stands allowed

ITA 3860/MUM/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Sept 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Omkareshwar Chidaraassessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Vimal Punmiya, CAFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha, SR. D.R
Section 133(6)Section 250

Section 142A of the Act as it stood for the year under consideration reads as under: "142. (1) For the purposes of making an assessment or reassessment