SHRIVALLABH PITTE INDUSTRIES LTD MUMBAI,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1),MUMBAI, MUMBAI

reassessment order under section\n153A (1) (b) or 153B (2) (b) of the act. After considering the\ndecision of the honourable Supreme Court in case of Rajesh Kumar\nversus DCIT (2007) 2 SCC 181 the honourable High Court held that\nit is not correct on the part of the revenue to contend that the\napproval itself is not justiciable

HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI.

reassessment order under section\n153A (1) (b) or 153B (2) (b) of the act. After considering the\ndecision of the honourable Supreme Court in case of Rajesh Kumar\nversus DCIT (2007) 2 SCC 181 the honourable High Court held that\nit is not correct on the part of the revenue to contend that the\napproval itself is not justiciable

HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI

reassessment order under section\n153A (1) (b) or 153B (2) (b) of the act. After considering the\ndecision of the honourable Supreme Court in case of Rajesh Kumar\nversus DCIT (2007) 2 SCC 181 the honourable High Court held that\nit is not correct on the part of the revenue to contend that the\napproval itself is not justiciable

SVP GLOBAL TEXTILES LTD FORMERLY SVP GLOBAL VENTURES LTD,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI MUMBAI, MUMBAI

reassessment order under section\n153A (1) (b) or 153B (2) (b) of the act. After considering the\ndecision of the honourable Supreme Court in case of Rajesh Kumar\nversus DCIT (2007) 2 SCC 181 the honourable High Court held that\nit is not correct on the part of the revenue to contend that the\napproval itself is not justiciable

HELLIOS EXPORTS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-8(2), MUMBAI

reassessment order under section\n153A (1) (b) or 153B (2) (b) of the act. After considering the\ndecision of the honourable Supreme Court in case of Rajesh Kumar\nversus DCIT (2007) 2 SCC 181 the honourable High Court held that\nit is not correct on the part of the revenue to contend that the\napproval itself is not justiciable

ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI vs. HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED, MUMBAI

reassessment order under section\n153A (1) (b) or 153B (2) (b) of the act. After considering the\ndecision of the honourable Supreme Court in case of Rajesh Kumar\nversus DCIT (2007) 2 SCC 181 the honourable High Court held that\nit is not correct on the part of the revenue to contend that the\napproval itself is not justiciable

HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI

reassessment order under section\n153A (1) (b) or 153B (2) (b) of the act. After considering the\ndecision of the honourable Supreme Court in case of Rajesh Kumar\nversus DCIT (2007) 2 SCC 181 the honourable High Court held that\nit is not correct on the part of the revenue to contend that the\napproval itself is not justiciable

ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI vs. HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED, MUMBAI

reassessment order under section\n153A (1) (b) or 153B (2) (b) of the act. After considering the\ndecision of the honourable Supreme Court in case of Rajesh Kumar\nversus DCIT (2007) 2 SCC 181 the honourable High Court held that\nit is not correct on the part of the revenue to contend that the\napproval itself is not justiciable

SHRIVALLABH PITTE INDUSTRIES LTD ,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRLE -6(1) , MUMBAI

reassessment order under section\n153A (1) (b) or 153B (2) (b) of the act. After considering the\ndecision of the honourable Supreme Court in case of Rajesh Kumar\nversus DCIT (2007) 2 SCC 181 the honourable High Court held that\nit is not correct on the part of the revenue to contend that the\napproval itself is not justiciable

MR. SATYA PRAKASH SINGH,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD-28(3)(1), VASHI

In the result, the ground so taken by the assessee so far as it relates to challenging the order of the AO as passed beyond the period of limitation is hereby allowed

Bench: Justice (Retd.) Shri C.V. Bhadang & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav

b) of sub-section (2) of section 119, an order of assessment under section 143 or section 144 may be made at any time before the expiry of twelve months from the end of the financial year in which such return was furnished.] (2) No order of assessment, reassessment

ITO-28(3)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. SATYA PRAKASH SINGH, MUMBAI

In the result, the ground so taken by the assessee so far as it relates to challenging the order of the AO as passed beyond the period of limitation is hereby allowed

Bench: Justice (Retd.) Shri C.V. Bhadang & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav

b) of sub-section (2) of section 119, an order of assessment under section 143 or section 144 may be made at any time before the expiry of twelve months from the end of the financial year in which such return was furnished.] (2) No order of assessment, reassessment

ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI vs. HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED, MUMBAI

reassessment order under section\n153A (1) (b) or 153B (2) (b) of the act. After considering the\ndecision of the honourable Supreme Court in case of Rajesh Kumar\nversus DCIT (2007) 2 SCC 181 the honourable High Court held that\nit is not correct on the part of the revenue to contend that the\napproval itself is not justiciable

ACIT (CC) -8(2) , MUMBAI vs. M/S. HELIOS MERCANTILE LTD, MUMBAI

reassessment order under section\n153A (1) (b) or 153B (2) (b) of the act. After considering the\ndecision of the honourable Supreme Court in case of Rajesh Kumar\nversus DCIT (2007) 2 SCC 181 the honourable High Court held that\nit is not correct on the part of the revenue to contend that the\napproval itself is not justiciable

SVP SOUTH WEST INDUSTRIES LTD. (FORMERLY, PLATINUM TEXTILE LTD.),MUMBAI-400005 vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8(2), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

reassessment order under section 153A (1) (b) or 153B (2) (b) of the act. After considering the decision of the honourable Supreme Court in case of Rajesh Kumar versus DCIT (2007) 2 SCC 181 the honourable High Court held that it is not correct on the part of the revenue to contend that the approval itself is not justiciable

SVP GLOBAL TEXTILES LTD FORMERLY SVP GLOBAL VENTURES LTD,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

reassessment order under section 153A (1) (b) or 153B (2) (b) of the act. After considering the decision of the honourable Supreme Court in case of Rajesh Kumar versus DCIT (2007) 2 SCC 181 the honourable High Court held that it is not correct on the part of the revenue to contend that the approval itself is not justiciable

SVP GLOBAL TEXTILES LTD FORMERLY SVP GLOBAL VENTURES LTD MUMBAI ,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI , MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

reassessment order under section 153A (1) (b) or 153B (2) (b) of the act. After considering the decision of the honourable Supreme Court in case of Rajesh Kumar versus DCIT (2007) 2 SCC 181 the honourable High Court held that it is not correct on the part of the revenue to contend that the approval itself is not justiciable

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S CITRON INFRAPROJECTS LTD , MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

reassessment order under section 153A (1) (b) or 153B (2) (b) of the act. After considering the decision of the honourable Supreme Court in case of Rajesh Kumar versus DCIT (2007) 2 SCC 181 the honourable High Court held that it is not correct on the part of the revenue to contend that the approval itself is not justiciable

CITRON INFRAPROJECT LTD.,,MUMBAI-400005 vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI-400020

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

reassessment order under section 153A (1) (b) or 153B (2) (b) of the act. After considering the decision of the honourable Supreme Court in case of Rajesh Kumar versus DCIT (2007) 2 SCC 181 the honourable High Court held that it is not correct on the part of the revenue to contend that the approval itself is not justiciable