BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

962 results for “reassessment”+ Search & Seizureclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,185Mumbai962Chennai310Hyderabad277Jaipur262Bangalore222Ahmedabad161Chandigarh128Kolkata124Pune88Amritsar75Patna69Rajkot58Nagpur58Raipur55Guwahati50Indore46Cochin45Surat43Ranchi37Lucknow28Visakhapatnam27Allahabad25Jodhpur25Agra23Dehradun23Cuttack15Panaji6Jabalpur4Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 153C159Section 143(3)105Section 153A88Addition to Income86Section 14860Section 13257Section 14750Section 25049Section 6838Search & Seizure

MANISH KASHIPRASAD SEKSARIA ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(2) , MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5499/MUM/2025[20187-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Dec 2025

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Rahul Chaudhary () Assessment Year: 2017-18 & Assessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-20

For Respondent: Assessee by Shri Bharat Kumar
Section 153C

search and seizure conducted in the case of third party therefore, in the absence of corroborati the case of third party therefore, in the absence of corroborati the case of third party therefore, in the absence of corroborative evidence to establish that the contents of pendrive are correct and evidence to establish that the contents of pendrive are correct

MANISH KASHIPRASAD SEKSARIA ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(2) , MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5501/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 962 · Page 1 of 49

...
38
Reopening of Assessment25
Reassessment20
ITAT Mumbai
23 Dec 2025
AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Rahul Chaudhary () Assessment Year: 2017-18 & Assessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-20

For Respondent: Assessee by Shri Bharat Kumar
Section 153C

search and seizure conducted in the case of third party therefore, in the absence of corroborati the case of third party therefore, in the absence of corroborati the case of third party therefore, in the absence of corroborative evidence to establish that the contents of pendrive are correct and evidence to establish that the contents of pendrive are correct

MANISH KASHIPRASAD SEKSARIA ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(2) , MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5500/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Rahul Chaudhary () Assessment Year: 2017-18 & Assessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-20

For Respondent: Assessee by Shri Bharat Kumar
Section 153C

search and seizure conducted in the case of third party therefore, in the absence of corroborati the case of third party therefore, in the absence of corroborati the case of third party therefore, in the absence of corroborative evidence to establish that the contents of pendrive are correct and evidence to establish that the contents of pendrive are correct

MISHRA GANESHA RAM ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRLCLE , MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5552/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2019-20 & Assessment Year: 2020-21

For Respondent: Assessee by Shri Bharat Kumar
Section 153C

search and seizure conducted in the case of third party therefore, in the absence of corroborative the case of third party therefore, in the absence of corroborative the case of third party therefore, in the absence of corroborative evidence to establish that the contents of pendrive are correct and evidence to establish that the contents of pendrive are correct

BALWANT LAXMANJI PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(2), MUMBAI

In the result, all the three appeal

ITA 8452/MUM/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Mar 2026AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

For Appellant: Mr. Arun Kanti Datta, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Mr. Bharat Kumar
Section 153CSection 250

search and seizure conducted in the case of third party therefore, in the absence of corroborative evidence to est therefore, in the absence of corroborative evidence to establish that the contents ablish that the contents of pendrive are correct and authenticated to the extent assessee paid ‘onmoney’ of pendrive are correct and authenticated to the extent assessee paid ‘onmoney

BALWANT LAXMANJI PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(2), MUMBAI

In the result, all the three appeal

ITA 8454/MUM/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Mar 2026AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

For Appellant: Mr. Arun Kanti Datta, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Mr. Bharat Kumar
Section 153CSection 250

search and seizure conducted in the case of third party therefore, in the absence of corroborative evidence to est therefore, in the absence of corroborative evidence to establish that the contents ablish that the contents of pendrive are correct and authenticated to the extent assessee paid ‘onmoney’ of pendrive are correct and authenticated to the extent assessee paid ‘onmoney

BALWANT LAXMANJI PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(2), MUMBAI

In the result, all the three appeal

ITA 8453/MUM/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Mar 2026AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

For Appellant: Mr. Arun Kanti Datta, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Mr. Bharat Kumar
Section 153CSection 250

search and seizure conducted in the case of third party therefore, in the absence of corroborative evidence to est therefore, in the absence of corroborative evidence to establish that the contents ablish that the contents of pendrive are correct and authenticated to the extent assessee paid ‘onmoney’ of pendrive are correct and authenticated to the extent assessee paid ‘onmoney

A ONE SIZING WORKS,BHIWANDI vs. THE ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 3 , THANE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 6458/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Jul 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2014-15 A One Sizing Works, The Asst. Cit Central Circle 3, House No. 1237, Opp. Ganesh 12, A Wing, Ashar It Park, 6Th Compound, Behind Mahakali Vs. Floor, Road No. 16Z, Wagle Dyeing Narpoli, Industrial Estate, Bhiwandi-421302. Thane West-400604. Pan No. Aajfa 6696 F Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Ms. Simran DhawanFor Respondent: 16/06/2025
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153A

seizure action, pertaining to the year under consideration. consideration. 4.1 We have heard rival submissions o We have heard rival submissions of the parties f the parties on the specific issue in dispute as regards to the existence of incriminating issue in dispute as regards to the existence of incriminating issue in dispute as regards to the existence of incriminating

ZENITH BARTER PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals are allowed as indicated above

ITA 6616/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vp & Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Am

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal &For Respondent: Dr. Kishor Dhule
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 68

search and seizure operation carried out u/s. 132 of the Act by the Directorate of Investigation, Mumbai, it was found that the assessee had availed unsecured loan from various entities as under :- 1. JMD Sounds Ltd. 2. Kumaon Engg. Co. Pvt. Ltd. 3. Nextgen Infotel Pvt. Ltd. 4. Kasturi Towers Ltd. 5. Sulabh Resources Pvt. Ltd. 6. He observed that

ZENITH BARTER PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC 4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals are allowed as indicated above

ITA 6613/MUM/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vp & Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Am

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal &For Respondent: Dr. Kishor Dhule
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 68

search and seizure operation carried out u/s. 132 of the Act by the Directorate of Investigation, Mumbai, it was found that the assessee had availed unsecured loan from various entities as under :- 1. JMD Sounds Ltd. 2. Kumaon Engg. Co. Pvt. Ltd. 3. Nextgen Infotel Pvt. Ltd. 4. Kasturi Towers Ltd. 5. Sulabh Resources Pvt. Ltd. 6. He observed that

ZENITH BARTER PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC 4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals are allowed as indicated above

ITA 6614/MUM/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vp & Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Am

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal &For Respondent: Dr. Kishor Dhule
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 68

search and seizure operation carried out u/s. 132 of the Act by the Directorate of Investigation, Mumbai, it was found that the assessee had availed unsecured loan from various entities as under :- 1. JMD Sounds Ltd. 2. Kumaon Engg. Co. Pvt. Ltd. 3. Nextgen Infotel Pvt. Ltd. 4. Kasturi Towers Ltd. 5. Sulabh Resources Pvt. Ltd. 6. He observed that

ZENITH BARTER PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC 4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals are allowed as indicated above

ITA 6612/MUM/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vp & Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Am

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal &For Respondent: Dr. Kishor Dhule
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 68

search and seizure operation carried out u/s. 132 of the Act by the Directorate of Investigation, Mumbai, it was found that the assessee had availed unsecured loan from various entities as under :- 1. JMD Sounds Ltd. 2. Kumaon Engg. Co. Pvt. Ltd. 3. Nextgen Infotel Pvt. Ltd. 4. Kasturi Towers Ltd. 5. Sulabh Resources Pvt. Ltd. 6. He observed that

ZENITH BARTER PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC 4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals are allowed as indicated above

ITA 6615/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vp & Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Am

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal &For Respondent: Dr. Kishor Dhule
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 68

search and seizure operation carried out u/s. 132 of the Act by the Directorate of Investigation, Mumbai, it was found that the assessee had availed unsecured loan from various entities as under :- 1. JMD Sounds Ltd. 2. Kumaon Engg. Co. Pvt. Ltd. 3. Nextgen Infotel Pvt. Ltd. 4. Kasturi Towers Ltd. 5. Sulabh Resources Pvt. Ltd. 6. He observed that

ZENITH BARTER PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC 4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals are allowed as indicated above

ITA 6617/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vp & Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Am

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal &For Respondent: Dr. Kishor Dhule
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 68

search and seizure operation carried out u/s. 132 of the Act by the Directorate of Investigation, Mumbai, it was found that the assessee had availed unsecured loan from various entities as under :- 1. JMD Sounds Ltd. 2. Kumaon Engg. Co. Pvt. Ltd. 3. Nextgen Infotel Pvt. Ltd. 4. Kasturi Towers Ltd. 5. Sulabh Resources Pvt. Ltd. 6. He observed that

INCOME TAX OFFICER-12(3)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. MANJU DIAMONDS PVT. LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes whereas the application under Rule 27 of statistical purposes whereas the application under Rule 27

ITA 2766/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan () Assessment Year: 2017-18 Ito-12(3)(1), Manju Diamonds Pvt. Ltd., R.No. 145, 1St Floor, Aayakar 57/59, 1St Floor, Nagdevi Street, Vs. Bhavan, M.K. Road, Maszid Bunder, Mumbai-400020. Mumbai-400 003. Pan No. Aaecm 6609 G Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Virabhadra S. Mahajan, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Ms. Dinkle Hariya
Section 133(6)Section 68

search and seizure action at the pr and seizure action at the premises of Shri Sushil Lahoti and his emises of Shri Sushil Lahoti and his admission that he was engaged in providing accommodation entries admission that he was engaged in providing accommodation entries admission that he was engaged in providing accommodation entries of the unsecured loans. of the unsecured

MAHADHAN AGRITECH LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SMARTECHEM TECHNOLOGIES LTD ) ,MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-50, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2226/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2015-16 Mahadhan Agritech Ltd. (Formerly Cit(A)-50, Dcit Cen. 8(1), Known As Smartchem Technologies 656, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Ltd.), Mumbai-400021. Survey No. 93, Sai Hira, Mundhwa, Pune-411036. Pan No. Aacca 5046 P Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Vijay MehtaFor Respondent: 28/11/2024
Section 132Section 153ASection 69A

seizure action u/s 132 of the Act was carried out on 15.11.2018 on was carried out on 15.11.2018 on the assessee along with other the assessee along with other entities forming part of ‘Deepak Fertilizers Group’. Consequently, a ’. Consequently, a notice u/s 153A of the Act was issued on 01.01.2020. In respons 3A of the Act was issued

THE DY.COMM. OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-5(1) ., MUMBAI vs. M/S. SHAH & PARIKH, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2704/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Apr 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Baskaran Br & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalethe Dcit, Vs. M/S Shah & Parikh Central Circle 5(1), 2, Vallabh Niwas, Room No. 1928, 19Th Malviya Road, Floor, Air India Bldg, Vile Parle(E), Nariman Point, Mumbai-400057 Mumbai – 400021. Pan/Gir No. : Aajfs4684D Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Shri.Dr. Kishor Dhule CIT-DR &For Respondent: Shri. JP Bairagra
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68Section 801A

seizure is effected and after the same at search and is effected, books of account, other documents, money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing is found as a result thereof that notwithstanding anything and within the meaning of the above provisions having been concluded, it is open for the revenue to make an assessment. It is also open

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-5(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S SPECO INFRASTRUCTURE, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue for A

ITA 2706/MUM/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Baskaran Br & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri.Dr. Kishor Dhule CIT-DR &For Respondent: Shri. JP Bairagra
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 801A

seizure is effected and after the same at search and is effected, books of account, other documents, money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing is found as a result thereof that notwithstanding anything and within the meaning of the above provisions having been concluded, it is open for the revenue to make an assessment. It is also open

THE DY COMM. OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-5(1) ., MUMBAI vs. RPS INFRA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue for A

ITA 2710/MUM/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Baskaran Br & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri.Dr. Kishor Dhule CIT-DR &For Respondent: Shri. JP Bairagra
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

seizure is effected and after the same at search and is effected, books of account, other documents, money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing is found as a result thereof that notwithstanding anything and within the meaning of M/s. RPS Infra Projects Pvt Ltd, Mumbai. the above provisions having been concluded, it is open for the revenue

THE DY COMM. OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-5(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S RPS INFRA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2625/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Apr 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Baskaran Br & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalethe Dcit, Vs. M/S Rps Priti Jv, Central Circle 5(1), C-113, Shyamkamal Room No. 1928, 19Th Bldg, 27 Tejpal Road, Floor, Air India Bldg, Agarwal Market, Vile Nariman Point, Parle (E), Mumbai – 400021. Mumbai-400057. Pan/Gir No. : Aabar7230F Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Shri.Dr. Kishor Dhule CIT-DR &For Respondent: Shri. JP Bairagra
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 801A

seizure is effected and after the same at search and is effected, books of account, other documents, money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing is found as a result thereof that notwithstanding anything and within the meaning of the above provisions having been concluded, it is open for the revenue to make an assessment. It is also open