SAIFULLAH A KHAN,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WD-3(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

section 54B of the Act to the assessee. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is being initiated for furnishing inaccurate particulars

SAIFULLAH A KHAN,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WD-3(3), THANE

Bench: Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Shri Ravish Soodsaifullah Abdullah Khan Commissioner Of Income Tax (A)-2, Prop: Reliance Engineering Co. Room No. 29, B Wing, 6Th Floor, G/58, Kharghar Village, Sector-12, Ashar I.T. Park, Wagle Industrial Estate, Vs. Behind Nimisha Hospital, Kharghar, Thane - 400 604 Navi Mumbai – 410210

u/s 10(1) since had been used for cultivation and are situated beyond 8 kms of the Municipal limits supported with distance certificates. d) The agricultural lands used for cultivation are supported with purchase and sale agreements, 7/12 certificates, Talati receipts and other documents. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter, and/or withdraw any of the grounds of appeal

GAD LOGISTIC I P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CEN CIR 1, THANE

In the result, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya, Am & Shri Ram Lal Negi, Jm

section 143(3) r.w.s.153(B)(b) and 143(3) r.w.s. 153(A)(a) r.w.s. 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) for the assessment year 2007-08 and the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) of the Act for the assessment year 2012-13. 2. Vide appeal No. 3128/M/2017 appeal, the assessee has challenged the impugned

DY CIT, CC-7(1), MUMBAI vs. MRS. NITTA VINODKUMAR JATIYA , MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri M Balaganesh & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaledcit, Cc-7(1) Vs. Mrs. Nitta Vinodkumar Room No. 676B, 6Th Jatiya, Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, 1, Pearl Mansion (N), Mk Road, Mumbai – 91, Marine Lines, 400020. Mk Road, Mumbai – 400020. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Accpj8343D Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Mr.Sanjiv Jain. Dr Respondent By : Mr.Snehal Shah. C A. Dr Date Of Hearing 15.11.2021 Date Of Pronouncement 11.02.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm:

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) as separately initiated for concealment of income. 4. Further, the A.O has denied the deduction U/sec54B of the Act based on the discussions on land and no Mrs. Nitta Vinodkumar Jatiya, Mumbai. agriculture activity was carried out by the assessee referred at Para 4 of the order and assessed the total income