REFINITIV LTD.,MUMBAI vs. THE DY DIT (I.T) 2(1), MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm Assessment Year 2000 – 01

44D of the act. He accordingly tax the revenues of the assessee received from routers India private limited in the form of distribution fee, product distribution fee and license fee on gross basis at 30% up the provisions of section 115A of the act. With respect to the revenue on front the agreement with ANI media, he held that

THE DDIT (I.T) 2(1) vs. M/S. REUTERS LTD.,

Appeals are disposed off

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm Assessment Year 2000 – 01

44D of the act. He accordingly tax the revenues of the assessee received from routers India private limited in the form of distribution fee, product distribution fee and license fee on gross basis at 30% up the provisions of section 115A of the act. With respect to the revenue on front the agreement with ANI media, he held that

THE DDIT (I.T) 2(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S. REUTERS LTD., MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm Assessment Year 2000 – 01

44D of the act. He accordingly tax the revenues of the assessee received from routers India private limited in the form of distribution fee, product distribution fee and license fee on gross basis at 30% up the provisions of section 115A of the act. With respect to the revenue on front the agreement with ANI media, he held that

ADIT (IT)-2(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S. REUTERS LTD., MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm Assessment Year 2000 – 01

44D of the act. He accordingly tax the revenues of the assessee received from routers India private limited in the form of distribution fee, product distribution fee and license fee on gross basis at 30% up the provisions of section 115A of the act. With respect to the revenue on front the agreement with ANI media, he held that

REFINITIV LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DDIT (I.T) - 2(1), MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm Assessment Year 2000 – 01

44D of the act. He accordingly tax the revenues of the assessee received from routers India private limited in the form of distribution fee, product distribution fee and license fee on gross basis at 30% up the provisions of section 115A of the act. With respect to the revenue on front the agreement with ANI media, he held that

REFINITIV LTD,MUMBAI vs. THE DDIT (IT)-2(1), MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm Assessment Year 2000 – 01

44D of the act. He accordingly tax the revenues of the assessee received from routers India private limited in the form of distribution fee, product distribution fee and license fee on gross basis at 30% up the provisions of section 115A of the act. With respect to the revenue on front the agreement with ANI media, he held that

REFINITIV LTD.,MUMBAI vs. THE DDIT (IT)-2(1), MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm Assessment Year 2000 – 01

44D of the act. He accordingly tax the revenues of the assessee received from routers India private limited in the form of distribution fee, product distribution fee and license fee on gross basis at 30% up the provisions of section 115A of the act. With respect to the revenue on front the agreement with ANI media, he held that

THE DDIT(IT)-2(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S. REUTERS LTD, UK, MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm Assessment Year 2000 – 01

44D of the act. He accordingly tax the revenues of the assessee received from routers India private limited in the form of distribution fee, product distribution fee and license fee on gross basis at 30% up the provisions of section 115A of the act. With respect to the revenue on front the agreement with ANI media, he held that

THE DDIT(IT)-2(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S. REUTERS LTD, UK, MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm Assessment Year 2000 – 01

44D of the act. He accordingly tax the revenues of the assessee received from routers India private limited in the form of distribution fee, product distribution fee and license fee on gross basis at 30% up the provisions of section 115A of the act. With respect to the revenue on front the agreement with ANI media, he held that

REFINITIV LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (IT) 2(1), MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm Assessment Year 2000 – 01

44D of the act. He accordingly tax the revenues of the assessee received from routers India private limited in the form of distribution fee, product distribution fee and license fee on gross basis at 30% up the provisions of section 115A of the act. With respect to the revenue on front the agreement with ANI media, he held that

ADIT (IT)-2(1), MUMBAI vs. REUTERS LTD, MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm Assessment Year 2000 – 01

44D of the act. He accordingly tax the revenues of the assessee received from routers India private limited in the form of distribution fee, product distribution fee and license fee on gross basis at 30% up the provisions of section 115A of the act. With respect to the revenue on front the agreement with ANI media, he held that

DDIT (IT) 2(1), MUMBAI vs. REUTERS LTD, MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm Assessment Year 2000 – 01

44D of the act. He accordingly tax the revenues of the assessee received from routers India private limited in the form of distribution fee, product distribution fee and license fee on gross basis at 30% up the provisions of section 115A of the act. With respect to the revenue on front the agreement with ANI media, he held that

DDIT (INTERNATIONAL I. T) 2(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S. REUTERS ON LINE S.A, MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm Assessment Year 2000 – 01

44D of the act. He accordingly tax the revenues of the assessee received from routers India private limited in the form of distribution fee, product distribution fee and license fee on gross basis at 30% up the provisions of section 115A of the act. With respect to the revenue on front the agreement with ANI media, he held that

ADIT (IT) RG 2, MUMBAI vs. REUTERS LTD, MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm Assessment Year 2000 – 01

44D of the act. He accordingly tax the revenues of the assessee received from routers India private limited in the form of distribution fee, product distribution fee and license fee on gross basis at 30% up the provisions of section 115A of the act. With respect to the revenue on front the agreement with ANI media, he held that

REFINITIV LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT (IT) 2(1), MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm Assessment Year 2000 – 01

44D of the act. He accordingly tax the revenues of the assessee received from routers India private limited in the form of distribution fee, product distribution fee and license fee on gross basis at 30% up the provisions of section 115A of the act. With respect to the revenue on front the agreement with ANI media, he held that

REFINITIV LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT (IT) RG 2(1), MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm Assessment Year 2000 – 01

44D of the act. He accordingly tax the revenues of the assessee received from routers India private limited in the form of distribution fee, product distribution fee and license fee on gross basis at 30% up the provisions of section 115A of the act. With respect to the revenue on front the agreement with ANI media, he held that

NOVARTIS INDIA LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT 7(1), MUMBAI

271(1)(c) is initiated separately for\nfurnishing inaccurate particulars of income”\n18. The sixteenth disputed issue with respect to\ncomputation of income from capital gains. The AO found\nthat the assessee in the revised return of income has\ncomputed the long term capital gains on sale of plot at\nGoregaon and working of the long term capital gain

ACIT CIR 7(1), MUMBAI vs. NOVARTIS INDIA ( FORMELRY KNOWN AS HINDUSTAN CIBA GIEGY LTD), MUMBAI

In the result, (i) the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose (ii) the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and (iii) the Cross Objections filed by the assessee ...

Bench: Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri Girish Agrawal & Co 76/Mum/2013 (A.Y 2003-04) Novartis India Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income–Tax–14(1)(1) Inspire Bkc, 7Th Floor, Room No 432, Bandra Kurla Complex, Aaykar Bhawan, Bandra (E) M.K. Marg, Mumbai-400051. Mumbai-400020. Pan/Gir No. Aaach2914F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) Deputy Commissioner Vs. Novartis India Limited Of Income–Tax–14(1)(1) Inspire Bkc, 7Th Floor, Room No 432, Bandra Kurla Complex, Aaykar Bhawan, Bandra (E) M.K. Marg, Mumbai-400051 Mumbai-400020 Pan/Gir No. Aaach2914F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant (""यथ"/Respondent)

271(1)(c) is initiated separately for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income” 18. The sixteenth disputed issue with respect to computation of income from capital gains. The AO found that the assessee in the revised return of income has computed the long term capital gains on sale of plot at Goregaon and working of the long term capital gain