BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

453 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 234Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi475Mumbai453Ahmedabad199Bangalore82Pune53Hyderabad43Jaipur41Kolkata38Rajkot29Allahabad23Karnataka21Indore21Raipur20Chandigarh12Surat12Amritsar11Dehradun11Lucknow10Guwahati7Patna6Agra5Chennai5Jodhpur5Nagpur3Cuttack3Visakhapatnam3SC2Jabalpur1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)110Addition to Income65Section 14848Penalty48Section 271(1)(c)40Section 6838Section 234B35Disallowance30Section 234A

M/S FLEMMINGO TRAVEL RETAIL LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN AS DFS INDIA P. LTD.),MUMBAI vs. DCIT - 9 (3) (2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 1197/MUM/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Aug 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Ravish Soodm/S Flemingo Travel Retail Dcit –9(3)(2) Room No. 418, 4Th Floor, Limited (Formerly Known As Dfs India Pvt. Ltd.), Chhatrapati Shivaji Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, International Airport, New Vs. Mumbai 400020 Terminal 2, Csi Airport, Sahar, Mumbai. Pan – Aaccd7412N (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Bairagra, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Rahul Raman, Sr.D.R
Section 1Section 115JSection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 40Section 43(1)

234C has been charged as per the provisions of IT Act, 1961. Penalty proceedings under s. 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961 have been initiated. Issue necessary forms." 24. The income of the assessee was thus assessed under s. 115JB and not under the normal provisions. It is in this context that we have to see and examine

Showing 1–20 of 453 · Page 1 of 23

...
26
Section 25024
Deduction24
Section 69C22

MARSH INDIA INSURANCE BROKERS PVT. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL /JTDY/ACIT/ITO/NFAC, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeal

ITA 2471/MUM/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan () Assessment Year: 2016-17 & Assessment Year: 2017-18 Marsh India Insurance Brokers Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Private Limited, Commissioner Of Income 1201-02, Tower, One India Vs. Tax/Income-Tax Officer, National Bulls Centre, Jupiter Mills E-Assessment Centre, Delhi. Compound, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road (West), Mumbai-400013. Pan No. Aadcm 4220 G Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Madhur Agrawal Revenue By : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Mr. Madhur AgrawalFor Respondent: Mr. Manoj Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 234ASection 234B

penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act has not been levied by way of this order and 271(1)(c) of the Act has not been levied by way of this order and 271(1)(c) of the Act has not been levied by way of this order and therefore, the issue being premature at this stage therefore

MARSH INDIA INSURANCE BROKERS PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ADDL/JT/DY/ASSTT/CIT/ITO/NFAC, DELHI, DELHI

In the result, both the appeal

ITA 642/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan () Assessment Year: 2016-17 & Assessment Year: 2017-18 Marsh India Insurance Brokers Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Private Limited, Commissioner Of Income 1201-02, Tower, One India Vs. Tax/Income-Tax Officer, National Bulls Centre, Jupiter Mills E-Assessment Centre, Delhi. Compound, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road (West), Mumbai-400013. Pan No. Aadcm 4220 G Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Madhur Agrawal Revenue By : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Mr. Madhur AgrawalFor Respondent: Mr. Manoj Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 234ASection 234B

penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act has not been levied by way of this order and 271(1)(c) of the Act has not been levied by way of this order and 271(1)(c) of the Act has not been levied by way of this order and therefore, the issue being premature at this stage therefore

VINEET THAKAR,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ITO(41)(4)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 6098/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Prabhash Shankar

For Appellant: Shri Devendra Jain,ARFor Respondent: Ms. Kavitha Kaushik (Sr. DR)
Section 147Section 234ASection 271(1)(c)Section 69A

234C. 6.1 On careful consideration of the contentions, we find that in the case under consideration, penalty for concealment u/s 271(1)(c) has been imposed in terms of Explanation 3 thereof, being a case of deemed concealment on account of non filing of the return. According to the Explanation 4 to Section

SWADESH TEXTILES P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 4(3)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 5140/MUM/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Aug 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh () & Shri N.K. Pradhan () Assessment Year: 2011-12 Swadeshi Textiles Pvt. Ltd. Ito-4(3)(4), Mumbai ¾, 1St Floor, Kapadia Vs. Chambers, 599, Jss Road, Chira Bazar, Mumbai- 400002. Pan No. Aagcs2102Q Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Snehal J. Shah, Ar Revenue By : Mr. V. Justin, Dr Date Of Hearing : 22/05/2018 Date Of Pronouncement: 17/08/2018

For Appellant: Mr. Snehal J. Shah, ARFor Respondent: Mr. V. Justin, DR
Section 115JSection 234BSection 234CSection 234DSection 271(1)(c)Section 44A

234C of Rs.17,301/- and u/s 234D of Rs.1,17,435/-. The disallowances made by the AO while computing book profit u/s 115JB are (i) instead of deducting depreciation debited to the P&L account, the assessee has deducted depreciation as per income tax and (ii) while computing the book profit, the assessee has deducted the entire book loss instead

ROBIN BIPIN MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CC 20, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4270/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Apr 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am Mr. Robin Bipin Mehta Vs. Acit- Cc-20, Mumbai – 3, Deepak, 1St Floor, 401, 400 021 S.V.Road, Vile Parle (West) Mumbai – 400 056 Pan/Gir No. Aabpm8343D Appellant) .. Respondent)

Section 132(1)Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153A(1)Section 271(1)(c)

234C as applicable. Give credit for taxes paid after due verification. Issue demand noticed and challan accordingly issue show cause notice for initiating penalty u/s 271 (l )( c) of the IT Act, 1961 for furnishing inaccurate particulars of the income. This order is passed after getting approval from Addl. CIT, Range-4, Central Circle-Il, Mumbai vide his letter

M/S. CIFCO FINANCE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD-II) CR-7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 2497/MUM/2006[2000-2001]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2000-2001

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

234C is consequential, no arguments were advanced, and hence, it is dismissed. 105. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 in ITA number 6075/M/2009 is partly allowed. 106. ITA number 489/M/2013 is filed by the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 wherein the learned CIT – A – 40, Mumbai power order dated 22/11/2012 confirmed the levy of penalty

CIFCO FINANCE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD II) CIR.7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 6147/MUM/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

234C is consequential, no arguments were advanced, and hence, it is dismissed. 105. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 in ITA number 6075/M/2009 is partly allowed. 106. ITA number 489/M/2013 is filed by the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 wherein the learned CIT – A – 40, Mumbai power order dated 22/11/2012 confirmed the levy of penalty

M/A. CIFCO FINANCE LTD,MUMBAI vs. THE ACIT (OSD II) CR-7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 490/MUM/2008[2004-2005]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2004-2005

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

234C is consequential, no arguments were advanced, and hence, it is dismissed. 105. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 in ITA number 6075/M/2009 is partly allowed. 106. ITA number 489/M/2013 is filed by the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 wherein the learned CIT – A – 40, Mumbai power order dated 22/11/2012 confirmed the levy of penalty

CIFCO FINANCE LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD II), CR 7,, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 1919/MUM/2009[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2005-2006

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

234C is consequential, no arguments were advanced, and hence, it is dismissed. 105. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 in ITA number 6075/M/2009 is partly allowed. 106. ITA number 489/M/2013 is filed by the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 wherein the learned CIT – A – 40, Mumbai power order dated 22/11/2012 confirmed the levy of penalty

CIFCO FINANCE LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT (OSD-II) CIR 7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 7547/MUM/2012[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

234C is consequential, no arguments were advanced, and hence, it is dismissed. 105. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 in ITA number 6075/M/2009 is partly allowed. 106. ITA number 489/M/2013 is filed by the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 wherein the learned CIT – A – 40, Mumbai power order dated 22/11/2012 confirmed the levy of penalty

ACIT (OSD-II) CENT. RG. - 7, MUMBAI vs. M/S. CIFCO FINANCE LTD., MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 2323/MUM/2006[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 1999-2000

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

234C is consequential, no arguments were advanced, and hence, it is dismissed. 105. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 in ITA number 6075/M/2009 is partly allowed. 106. ITA number 489/M/2013 is filed by the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 wherein the learned CIT – A – 40, Mumbai power order dated 22/11/2012 confirmed the levy of penalty

M/S. CIFCO FINANCE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD-II) CR-7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 2499/MUM/2006[2002-2003]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2002-2003

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

234C is consequential, no arguments were advanced, and hence, it is dismissed. 105. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 in ITA number 6075/M/2009 is partly allowed. 106. ITA number 489/M/2013 is filed by the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 wherein the learned CIT – A – 40, Mumbai power order dated 22/11/2012 confirmed the levy of penalty

CIFCO FINANCE LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD-II) CR 7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 6075/MUM/2009[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

234C is consequential, no arguments were advanced, and hence, it is dismissed. 105. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 in ITA number 6075/M/2009 is partly allowed. 106. ITA number 489/M/2013 is filed by the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 wherein the learned CIT – A – 40, Mumbai power order dated 22/11/2012 confirmed the levy of penalty

CIFCO FINANCE LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (OSD-II) CR-7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 487/MUM/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2003-04

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

234C is consequential, no arguments were advanced, and hence, it is dismissed. 105. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 in ITA number 6075/M/2009 is partly allowed. 106. ITA number 489/M/2013 is filed by the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 wherein the learned CIT – A – 40, Mumbai power order dated 22/11/2012 confirmed the levy of penalty

M/S. CIFCO FINANCE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD-II) CR-7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 2498/MUM/2006[2001-2002]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2001-2002

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

234C is consequential, no arguments were advanced, and hence, it is dismissed. 105. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 in ITA number 6075/M/2009 is partly allowed. 106. ITA number 489/M/2013 is filed by the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 wherein the learned CIT – A – 40, Mumbai power order dated 22/11/2012 confirmed the levy of penalty

M/S. CIFCO FINANCE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD-II) CR-7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 2496/MUM/2006[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 1999-2000

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

234C is consequential, no arguments were advanced, and hence, it is dismissed. 105. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 in ITA number 6075/M/2009 is partly allowed. 106. ITA number 489/M/2013 is filed by the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 wherein the learned CIT – A – 40, Mumbai power order dated 22/11/2012 confirmed the levy of penalty

CIFCO FINANCE LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (OSD-II) CR-7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 488/MUM/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

234C is consequential, no arguments were advanced, and hence, it is dismissed. 105. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 in ITA number 6075/M/2009 is partly allowed. 106. ITA number 489/M/2013 is filed by the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 wherein the learned CIT – A – 40, Mumbai power order dated 22/11/2012 confirmed the levy of penalty

M/S. CIFCO FINANCE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD-II) CR.-7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 5462/MUM/2006[2003-2004]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2003-2004

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

234C is consequential, no arguments were advanced, and hence, it is dismissed. 105. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 in ITA number 6075/M/2009 is partly allowed. 106. ITA number 489/M/2013 is filed by the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 wherein the learned CIT – A – 40, Mumbai power order dated 22/11/2012 confirmed the levy of penalty

CIFCO FINANCE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD II) CIR.7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 6146/MUM/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

234C is consequential, no arguments were advanced, and hence, it is dismissed. 105. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 in ITA number 6075/M/2009 is partly allowed. 106. ITA number 489/M/2013 is filed by the assessee for assessment year 2006 – 07 wherein the learned CIT – A – 40, Mumbai power order dated 22/11/2012 confirmed the levy of penalty