BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

712 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 234B(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi864Mumbai712Ahmedabad241Bangalore186Pune78Hyderabad71Jaipur71Kolkata66Indore32Rajkot31Chandigarh30Allahabad26Karnataka21Surat19Dehradun16Chennai16Nagpur15Lucknow15Amritsar15Agra10Patna10Visakhapatnam6Jodhpur6Cuttack4Ranchi3Raipur3Jabalpur3SC2Cochin2Telangana1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)118Addition to Income77Penalty55Section 234B43Section 271(1)(c)40Disallowance30Section 14829Section 14722Section 69A

FRANKLIN TEMPLETON INTERNATIONAL SERVICES (INDIA) P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIR 6(3)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 1495/MUM/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Feb 2026AY 2010-11
Section 133(6)Section 92D

271(1)(c)\nof the Act.\nThe Appellant prays that the penalty proceedings be dropped in\nthe matter.\nGround 3 - Levy of interest under section 234B of the Act - The\nsaid ground is consequential in nature\n3.1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned AO\nhas erred in charging interest

M/S FLEMMINGO TRAVEL RETAIL LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN AS DFS INDIA P. LTD.),MUMBAI vs. DCIT - 9 (3) (2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 1197/MUM/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Aug 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Ravish Soodm/S Flemingo Travel Retail Dcit –9(3)(2) Room No. 418, 4Th Floor, Limited (Formerly Known As Dfs India Pvt. Ltd.), Chhatrapati Shivaji Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, International Airport, New Vs. Mumbai 400020 Terminal 2, Csi Airport, Sahar, Mumbai. Pan – Aaccd7412N (Appellant) (Respondent)

Showing 1–20 of 712 · Page 1 of 36

...
21
Deduction21
Section 69C20
Section 6820
For Appellant: Shri J.P. Bairagra, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Rahul Raman, Sr.D.R
Section 1Section 115JSection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 40Section 43(1)

234B and 234C has been charged as per the provisions of IT Act, 1961. Penalty proceedings under s. 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961 have been initiated. Issue necessary forms." 24. The income of the assessee was thus assessed under s. 115JB and not under the normal provisions. It is in this context that we have

CIFCO FINANCE LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (OSD-II) CR-7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 489/MUM/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

271 (1) © of the income tax act, 1961 levied by the learned assessing officer as per order dated 29/6/2011 was confirmed. Therefore assessee is aggrieved and in appeal before us. Page 39 of 50 107. We find that the learned assessing officer has levied penalty with respect to the several disallowances made in the order u/s 143 (3

M/S. CIFCO FINANCE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD-II) CR.-7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 5462/MUM/2006[2003-2004]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2003-2004

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

271 (1) © of the income tax act, 1961 levied by the learned assessing officer as per order dated 29/6/2011 was confirmed. Therefore assessee is aggrieved and in appeal before us. Page 39 of 50 107. We find that the learned assessing officer has levied penalty with respect to the several disallowances made in the order u/s 143 (3

M/A. CIFCO FINANCE LTD,MUMBAI vs. THE ACIT (OSD II) CR-7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 490/MUM/2008[2004-2005]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2004-2005

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

271 (1) © of the income tax act, 1961 levied by the learned assessing officer as per order dated 29/6/2011 was confirmed. Therefore assessee is aggrieved and in appeal before us. Page 39 of 50 107. We find that the learned assessing officer has levied penalty with respect to the several disallowances made in the order u/s 143 (3

CIFCO FINANCE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD II) CIR.7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 6146/MUM/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

271 (1) © of the income tax act, 1961 levied by the learned assessing officer as per order dated 29/6/2011 was confirmed. Therefore assessee is aggrieved and in appeal before us. Page 39 of 50 107. We find that the learned assessing officer has levied penalty with respect to the several disallowances made in the order u/s 143 (3

M/S. CIFCO FINANCE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD-II) CR-7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 2497/MUM/2006[2000-2001]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2000-2001

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

271 (1) © of the income tax act, 1961 levied by the learned assessing officer as per order dated 29/6/2011 was confirmed. Therefore assessee is aggrieved and in appeal before us. Page 39 of 50 107. We find that the learned assessing officer has levied penalty with respect to the several disallowances made in the order u/s 143 (3

M/S. CIFCO FINANCE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD-II) CR-7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 2496/MUM/2006[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 1999-2000

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

271 (1) © of the income tax act, 1961 levied by the learned assessing officer as per order dated 29/6/2011 was confirmed. Therefore assessee is aggrieved and in appeal before us. Page 39 of 50 107. We find that the learned assessing officer has levied penalty with respect to the several disallowances made in the order u/s 143 (3

CIFCO FINANCE LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD-II) CR 7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 6075/MUM/2009[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

271 (1) © of the income tax act, 1961 levied by the learned assessing officer as per order dated 29/6/2011 was confirmed. Therefore assessee is aggrieved and in appeal before us. Page 39 of 50 107. We find that the learned assessing officer has levied penalty with respect to the several disallowances made in the order u/s 143 (3

CIFCO FINANCE LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD II), CR 7,, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 1919/MUM/2009[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2005-2006

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

271 (1) © of the income tax act, 1961 levied by the learned assessing officer as per order dated 29/6/2011 was confirmed. Therefore assessee is aggrieved and in appeal before us. Page 39 of 50 107. We find that the learned assessing officer has levied penalty with respect to the several disallowances made in the order u/s 143 (3

THE ACIT (OSD-II) CEN RG-7, MUMBAI vs. M/S. CIFCO FINANCE LTD, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 2341/MUM/2006[2000-2001]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2000-2001

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

271 (1) © of the income tax act, 1961 levied by the learned assessing officer as per order dated 29/6/2011 was confirmed. Therefore assessee is aggrieved and in appeal before us. Page 39 of 50 107. We find that the learned assessing officer has levied penalty with respect to the several disallowances made in the order u/s 143 (3

CIFCO FINANCE LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (OSD-II) CR-7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 487/MUM/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2003-04

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

271 (1) © of the income tax act, 1961 levied by the learned assessing officer as per order dated 29/6/2011 was confirmed. Therefore assessee is aggrieved and in appeal before us. Page 39 of 50 107. We find that the learned assessing officer has levied penalty with respect to the several disallowances made in the order u/s 143 (3

M/S. CIFCO FINANCE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD-II) CR-7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 2498/MUM/2006[2001-2002]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2001-2002

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

271 (1) © of the income tax act, 1961 levied by the learned assessing officer as per order dated 29/6/2011 was confirmed. Therefore assessee is aggrieved and in appeal before us. Page 39 of 50 107. We find that the learned assessing officer has levied penalty with respect to the several disallowances made in the order u/s 143 (3

CIFCO FINANCE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD II) CIR.7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 6147/MUM/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

271 (1) © of the income tax act, 1961 levied by the learned assessing officer as per order dated 29/6/2011 was confirmed. Therefore assessee is aggrieved and in appeal before us. Page 39 of 50 107. We find that the learned assessing officer has levied penalty with respect to the several disallowances made in the order u/s 143 (3

M/S. CIFCO FINANCE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (OSD-II) CR-7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 2499/MUM/2006[2002-2003]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2002-2003

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

271 (1) © of the income tax act, 1961 levied by the learned assessing officer as per order dated 29/6/2011 was confirmed. Therefore assessee is aggrieved and in appeal before us. Page 39 of 50 107. We find that the learned assessing officer has levied penalty with respect to the several disallowances made in the order u/s 143 (3

CIFCO FINANCE LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (OSD-II) CR-7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 488/MUM/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

271 (1) © of the income tax act, 1961 levied by the learned assessing officer as per order dated 29/6/2011 was confirmed. Therefore assessee is aggrieved and in appeal before us. Page 39 of 50 107. We find that the learned assessing officer has levied penalty with respect to the several disallowances made in the order u/s 143 (3

ACIT (OSD-II) CENT. RG. - 7, MUMBAI vs. M/S. CIFCO FINANCE LTD., MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 2323/MUM/2006[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 1999-2000

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

271 (1) © of the income tax act, 1961 levied by the learned assessing officer as per order dated 29/6/2011 was confirmed. Therefore assessee is aggrieved and in appeal before us. Page 39 of 50 107. We find that the learned assessing officer has levied penalty with respect to the several disallowances made in the order u/s 143 (3

CIFCO FINANCE LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT (OSD-II) CIR 7, MUMBAI

In the result all 16 appeals related to the assessee are disposed off

ITA 7547/MUM/2012[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Mumbai Before Sri Amit Shukla J M & Prashant Maharishi Am In The Matter Of Cifco Finance Limited, [ Aaacc1765F] Bhupen Chambers, Dalal Street, Mumbai V The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax Aykar Bhavan 4Th Floor , M K Road Mumbai 20

Section 143Section 147Section 271

271 (1) © of the income tax act, 1961 levied by the learned assessing officer as per order dated 29/6/2011 was confirmed. Therefore assessee is aggrieved and in appeal before us. Page 39 of 50 107. We find that the learned assessing officer has levied penalty with respect to the several disallowances made in the order u/s 143 (3

MARSH INDIA INSURANCE BROKERS PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ADDL/JT/DY/ASSTT/CIT/ITO/NFAC, DELHI, DELHI

In the result, both the appeal

ITA 642/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan () Assessment Year: 2016-17 & Assessment Year: 2017-18 Marsh India Insurance Brokers Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Private Limited, Commissioner Of Income 1201-02, Tower, One India Vs. Tax/Income-Tax Officer, National Bulls Centre, Jupiter Mills E-Assessment Centre, Delhi. Compound, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road (West), Mumbai-400013. Pan No. Aadcm 4220 G Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Madhur Agrawal Revenue By : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Mr. Madhur AgrawalFor Respondent: Mr. Manoj Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 234ASection 234B

234B of the Act. Marsh India Insurance Brokers Pvt. Ltd. Marsh India Insurance Brokers Pvt. Ltd. ITA Nos. 2471/MUM/2021 & 642/Mum/2022 Ground No. 5: Error in initiating penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) Ground No. 5: Error in initiating penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) Ground No. 5: Error in initiating penalty proceedings u/s 271

MARSH INDIA INSURANCE BROKERS PVT. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL /JTDY/ACIT/ITO/NFAC, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeal

ITA 2471/MUM/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan () Assessment Year: 2016-17 & Assessment Year: 2017-18 Marsh India Insurance Brokers Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Private Limited, Commissioner Of Income 1201-02, Tower, One India Vs. Tax/Income-Tax Officer, National Bulls Centre, Jupiter Mills E-Assessment Centre, Delhi. Compound, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road (West), Mumbai-400013. Pan No. Aadcm 4220 G Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Madhur Agrawal Revenue By : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Mr. Madhur AgrawalFor Respondent: Mr. Manoj Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 234ASection 234B

234B of the Act. Marsh India Insurance Brokers Pvt. Ltd. Marsh India Insurance Brokers Pvt. Ltd. ITA Nos. 2471/MUM/2021 & 642/Mum/2022 Ground No. 5: Error in initiating penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) Ground No. 5: Error in initiating penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) Ground No. 5: Error in initiating penalty proceedings u/s 271