BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

122 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 153B(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi205Mumbai122Jaipur69Allahabad37Bangalore37Chennai26Kolkata25Pune22Chandigarh20Ahmedabad14Dehradun8Agra7Rajkot7Guwahati6Nagpur6Raipur6Hyderabad5Surat5Lucknow4Karnataka3Cuttack3Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)61Section 13253Addition to Income53Section 153A49Section 271(1)(c)48Section 153D21Section 271A20Section 25019Section 153

SAI SAMARTH ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DCIT , CC- 1 , THANE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are hereby allowed

ITA 3718/MUM/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 May 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3718/Mum/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3720/Mum/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3721/Mum/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) बिधम/ M/S. Sai Samarth Enterprises Dcit-Central Circle-1, 107, Patel Building, Parel, Thane. Vs. Mumbai. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Abufs9008B (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Suchek Anchaliya Revenue By: Shri T. S. Khalsa (Sr. Ar) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 04/03/2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 24/05/2021 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh, (Jm): The Assessee Has Filed The Above Mentioned Appeals Against The Order Dated 29.03.2018 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- 11, Pune [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Cit(A)”] Relevant To The A.Ys. 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 In Which The Penalty Levied By The Ao Has Been Ordered To Be Confirmed.

For Appellant: Shri Suchek AnchaliyaFor Respondent: Shri T. S. Khalsa (Sr. AR)
Section 132Section 132oSection 139(1)Section 143(2)

Showing 1–20 of 122 · Page 1 of 7

17
Penalty16
Search & Seizure12
Survey u/s 133A9
Section 153A
Section 153C
Section 271(1)(c)
Section 274

u/s 153 r.w.s 153C of the Act. In the case of Kirit Dahyabhai Patel Vs. ACIT (2017) 80 taxmann.com 162 (Guj). The following finding has been given as under.:- “8. We have heard learned advocates for the parties and perused the material on record. Before dealing with the contentions, it would be relevant to reproduce Explanation 5 to Section 271

NAVNITLAL K PARIKH,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CC-45, MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6820/MUM/2008[2004-2005]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Apr 2017AY 2004-2005

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Years: 2004-05 Mr. Navnitlal K. Parikh, Acit, F-2, 77 & 78 Gujrati Society Cc-45, बनाम/ Nehru Road, Vile Parle (E), Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Mumbai-400057 M.K. Road, Mumbai-400020 ("नधा"रती/Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pa No.:-Aaccp6245F "नधा"रती क" ओर से / Assessee By Shri Shailesh Parmar Shri Suman Kumar-Dr राज"व क" ओर से / Revenue By 05/04/2017 सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 18/04/2017 आदेश क" तार"ख /Date Of Order: Mr. Navnitlal K. Parikh

Section 139Section 15Section 153ASection 271(1)Section 271(1)(C)Section 271(1)(c)Section 5

penalty levied by the AO u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act in all the years under consideration.” 5.9 Similarly, in the case of Shri Prem Arora (supra), the Delhi Bench of this Tribunal has held in paragraph 9 to 12 as under: 9. We have heard both the parties and gone through the material available on record. The first

M/S.BALAJI BULLION & COMMODITIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-40, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 1291/MUM/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Apr 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm Balaji Bullion & Commodities The Dy. Commissioner Of (India) Private Limited Income–Tax, 118/120, 3Rd Floor, Ashoka Central Circle–40, Vs. House Zavri Baazar, Mumbai Mumbai-400 002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aadcbo236F Balaji Universal Tradelinks P. The Dy. Commissioner Of Ltd. Income–Tax, 118/120, 3Rd Floor, Ashoka Central Circle–40, Vs. House Zavri Baazar, Mumbai Mumbai-400 002

For Appellant: Shri N.M. Porwal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Dr. Mahesh Akhade, CIT DR
Section 10ASection 153ASection 153BSection 37Section 68

penalty proceedings u/s. 271 (1) (c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 23. Any other ground or grounds as may be urged at the time of hearing.” 06. Assessee in ITA No 1292 is a company engaged in trading in gold bar, gold jewellery, cut and polished diamonds in manufacturing of gold jewelry etc. For impugned assessment year assessee filed

SVP SOUTH WEST INDUSTRIES LTD. (FORMERLY, PLATINUM TEXTILE LTD.),MUMBAI-400005 vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8(2), MUMBAI

ITA 1273/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) in the instant case where no additions were made and, in a year, where the section was non- existent. o. In the case of Citron Infraprojects Ltd, for AY 2012-13 to AY 2018-19, the approval number granted by the Addl. CIT has not been mentioned in the Assessment Orders. p. In the case

ACIT (CC)-8(2) , MUMBAI vs. HELIOS EXPORTS LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 1735/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) in the instant case where no additions were made and, in a year, where the section was non- existent. o. In the case of Citron Infraprojects Ltd, for AY 2012-13 to AY 2018-19, the approval number granted by the Addl. CIT has not been mentioned in the Assessment Orders. p. In the case

ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI vs. HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED, MUMBAI

ITA 1740/MUM/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) in the instant case where no additions were made and, in a year, where the section was non- existent. o. In the case of Citron Infraprojects Ltd, for AY 2012-13 to AY 2018-19, the approval number granted by the Addl. CIT has not been mentioned in the Assessment Orders. p. In the case

ACIT (CC)-8(2) , MUMBAI vs. HELIOS EXPORTS LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 1734/MUM/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) in the instant case where no additions were made and, in a year, where the section was non- existent. o. In the case of Citron Infraprojects Ltd, for AY 2012-13 to AY 2018-19, the approval number granted by the Addl. CIT has not been mentioned in the Assessment Orders. p. In the case

HELLIOS EXPORTS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI

ITA 1334/MUM/2022[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) in the instant case where no additions were made and, in a year, where the section was non- existent. o. In the case of Citron Infraprojects Ltd, for AY 2012-13 to AY 2018-19, the approval number granted by the Addl. CIT has not been mentioned in the Assessment Orders. p. In the case

CITRON INFRAPROJECT LTD.,,MUMBAI-400005 vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI-20

ITA 1267/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) in the instant case where no additions were made and, in a year, where the section was non- existent. o. In the case of Citron Infraprojects Ltd, for AY 2012-13 to AY 2018-19, the approval number granted by the Addl. CIT has not been mentioned in the Assessment Orders. p. In the case

SVP SOUTH WEST INDUSTRIES LTD. (FORMERLY, PLATINUM TEXTILE LTD.),MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC- 8(2), MUMBAI

ITA 1271/MUM/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) in the instant case where no additions were made and, in a year, where the section was non- existent. o. In the case of Citron Infraprojects Ltd, for AY 2012-13 to AY 2018-19, the approval number granted by the Addl. CIT has not been mentioned in the Assessment Orders. p. In the case

CITRON INFRAPROJECT LTD.,,MUMBAI-400005 vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI-400020

ITA 1268/MUM/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) in the instant case where no additions were made and, in a year, where the section was non- existent. o. In the case of Citron Infraprojects Ltd, for AY 2012-13 to AY 2018-19, the approval number granted by the Addl. CIT has not been mentioned in the Assessment Orders. p. In the case

SVP SOUTH WEST INDUSTRIES LTD. (FORMERLY, PLATINUM TEXTILE LTD.),MUMBAI-400005 vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8(2), MUMBAI

ITA 1272/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) in the instant case where no additions were made and, in a year, where the section was non- existent. o. In the case of Citron Infraprojects Ltd, for AY 2012-13 to AY 2018-19, the approval number granted by the Addl. CIT has not been mentioned in the Assessment Orders. p. In the case

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S CITRON INFRAPROJECTS LTD , MUMBAI

ITA 1572/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) in the instant case where no additions were made and, in a year, where the section was non- existent. o. In the case of Citron Infraprojects Ltd, for AY 2012-13 to AY 2018-19, the approval number granted by the Addl. CIT has not been mentioned in the Assessment Orders. p. In the case

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2)., MUMBAI vs. M/S CITRON INFRAPROJECTS LTD , MUMBAI

ITA 1569/MUM/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) in the instant case where no additions were made and, in a year, where the section was non- existent. o. In the case of Citron Infraprojects Ltd, for AY 2012-13 to AY 2018-19, the approval number granted by the Addl. CIT has not been mentioned in the Assessment Orders. p. In the case

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S CITRON INFRAPROJECTS LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 1571/MUM/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) in the instant case where no additions were made and, in a year, where the section was non- existent. o. In the case of Citron Infraprojects Ltd, for AY 2012-13 to AY 2018-19, the approval number granted by the Addl. CIT has not been mentioned in the Assessment Orders. p. In the case

SVP GLOBAL TEXTILES LTD FORMERLY SVP GLOBAL VENTURES LTD MUMBAI ,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI , MUMBAI

ITA 1313/MUM/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) in the instant case where no additions were made and, in a year, where the section was non- existent. o. In the case of Citron Infraprojects Ltd, for AY 2012-13 to AY 2018-19, the approval number granted by the Addl. CIT has not been mentioned in the Assessment Orders. p. In the case

SVP GLOBAL TEXTILES LTD FORMERLY SVP GLOBAL VENTURES LTD,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI MUMBAI MUMB, MUMBAI

ITA 1311/MUM/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) in the instant case where no additions were made and, in a year, where the section was non- existent. o. In the case of Citron Infraprojects Ltd, for AY 2012-13 to AY 2018-19, the approval number granted by the Addl. CIT has not been mentioned in the Assessment Orders. p. In the case

SVP GLOBAL TEXTILES LTD FORMERLY SVP GLOBAL VENTURES LTD,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

ITA 1310/MUM/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) in the instant case where no additions were made and, in a year, where the section was non- existent. o. In the case of Citron Infraprojects Ltd, for AY 2012-13 to AY 2018-19, the approval number granted by the Addl. CIT has not been mentioned in the Assessment Orders. p. In the case

SHRIVALLABH PITTIE INDUSTRIES LTD ,MUMBAI. vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI

ITA 1337/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) in the instant case where no additions were made and, in a year, where the section was non- existent. o. In the case of Citron Infraprojects Ltd, for AY 2012-13 to AY 2018-19, the approval number granted by the Addl. CIT has not been mentioned in the Assessment Orders. p. In the case

ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI vs. HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED, MUMBAI

ITA 1739/MUM/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) in the instant case where no additions were made and, in a year, where the section was non- existent. o. In the case of Citron Infraprojects Ltd, for AY 2012-13 to AY 2018-19, the approval number granted by the Addl. CIT has not been mentioned in the Assessment Orders. p. In the case