38 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 115Aclear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 38 · Page 1 of 2
In the result, the appeals by the Revenue and the cross-objections by the assessee are dismissed
Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Sandeep Singh Karhail
u/s 148 rws 147 of the Act. 4. Whether on the facts of the case and in law the Id. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the penalty by holding that the income determined after reassessment was subjective and open to interpretation, whereas the facts are different and heads of income have been confirmed by the ITAT and only