BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Bogus/Accommodation Entryclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4Hyderabad2Delhi1

Key Topics

Section 685Section 10(38)3Addition to Income3Section 143(3)2Section 69C2Section 145(3)2Section 143(1)2Section 133(1)(d)2Penalty2

MYSTIC ELECTRONICS LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 10(3)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, ground no. 3 with its sub grounds is allowed

ITA 3210/MUM/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Smt Renu Jauhriassessment Year: 2013-14 Mystic Electronics Ito Ward 10(3)(3) Limited Aaykar Bhavan, 401-A, Pearl Arcade, M.K. Road, Opp. P. K. Jwellers, Maharashtra- 400020. Vs. Dawood Baugh Lane, Off J. P. Road, Maharashtra- 400058. Pan: Aagcp1710R Appellant : Respondent

For Appellant: RespondentFor Respondent: R. R. Makwana, Sr. D.R
Section 131Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 145(3)

bogus/accommodation entries. 2. In doing so, the Id. CIT(A) did not appreciate that a. the AO could not have rejected the books of account without establishing the defects, incompleteness and inaccuracies in the accounts of the appellant as required u/s 145(3) of the Act. b. merely because the purchase & sale parties could not be produced, the same cannot

MUKTA AGRICULTURE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 10(3)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, ground no. 3 with its sub grounds is allowed

ITA 3211/MUM/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhryassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri N.R. Agrawal, Ld. C.AFor Respondent: Shri Srinivas P., Ld. Sr. D.R
Section 133(1)(d)Section 133(6)Section 143(1)Section 145(3)Section 250

bogus/accommodation entries and consequently made the addition @ 1% of such amount which worked out to Rs.40,08,601/- and added the same in the income of the Assessee. 5. The Assessee, being aggrieved, challenged the said addition before the Ld. Commissioner and filed the following documents as filed before the AO: “i Party wise details of purchases & sales

REKHA RAJESH JOGANI,MUMBAI vs. ITO 19(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2916/MUM/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Hon’Ble & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri. Sashank Mehta, CAFor Respondent: Mr. R. R. Makwana, Addl. CIT
Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 274Section 68Section 69C

271(1)(c) to be dropped 2.1. Grounds taken are in respect of addition made under section 68 by denying exemption claimed under section 10(38) of the Act for the sale proceeds of listed equity shares alleged as penny stock amounting to ₹ 45,21,595/- on the scrip SRK Industries Ltd. and for addition of ₹ 90,432/- under section

ACIT-4(3)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. QMAX SYNTHETICS PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

ITA 7561/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Feb 2026AY 2012-13
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68Section 69C

bogus/accommodation entries of loan amounting to\nINR.16,00,00/- from hawala companies floated by Mr. Pravin Kumar\nJain. The Assessing Officer called on the Assessee to give justification\nfor the loan transactions in the books of accounts. The Assessee\nsubmitted the following details with regard to the loans obtained:\nSr.\nNo.\nName of the concern controlled and managed by\nShri