MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

undisclosed income of cash expenditure, balance sheet found during the course of search which was not disclosed by the assessee to the learned assessing officer from which it has been gathered that assessee is owner of the various properties, income from which is not disclosed under the head income from house

MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

undisclosed income of cash expenditure, balance sheet found during the course of search which was not disclosed by the assessee to the learned assessing officer from which it has been gathered that assessee is owner of the various properties, income from which is not disclosed under the head income from house

MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

undisclosed income of cash expenditure, balance sheet found during the course of search which was not disclosed by the assessee to the learned assessing officer from which it has been gathered that assessee is owner of the various properties, income from which is not disclosed under the head income from house

MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

undisclosed income of cash expenditure, balance sheet found during the course of search which was not disclosed by the assessee to the learned assessing officer from which it has been gathered that assessee is owner of the various properties, income from which is not disclosed under the head income from house

MOHAN GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRLE - 5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

undisclosed income of cash expenditure, balance sheet found during the course of search which was not disclosed by the assessee to the learned assessing officer from which it has been gathered that assessee is owner of the various properties, income from which is not disclosed under the head income from house

PRIYA MOHAN GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

undisclosed services by making an addition u/s 68 of the income tax act by the learned assessing officer in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search iii. addition of Rs. 119,718/– as notional income from house property

PRIYA MOHAN GURNANAI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

undisclosed services by making an addition u/s 68 of the income tax act by the learned assessing officer in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search iii. addition of Rs. 119,718/– as notional income from house property

PRIYA MOHAN GURNANAI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

undisclosed services by making an addition u/s 68 of the income tax act by the learned assessing officer in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search iii. addition of Rs. 119,718/– as notional income from house property

PRIYA MOHAN GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. CY CIT-CC-5(2), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

undisclosed services by making an addition u/s 68 of the income tax act by the learned assessing officer in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search iii. addition of Rs. 119,718/– as notional income from house property

PRIYA MOHAN GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

undisclosed services by making an addition u/s 68 of the income tax act by the learned assessing officer in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search iii. addition of Rs. 119,718/– as notional income from house property

PRIYA MOHAN GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

undisclosed services by making an addition u/s 68 of the income tax act by the learned assessing officer in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search iii. addition of Rs. 119,718/– as notional income from house property

MORAJ BUILDING CONCEPTS PVT LTD,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRLE - 5(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

undisclosed income was found during search and accordingly, to the extent of ₹.93,100/- was added back to the income of the assessee and further, Assessing Officer observed that assessee was holding various flats / shops / offices as closing stock. In the post search proceedings, assessee was asked to furnish year wise details of stock in trade of the fully constructed

MORAJ BUILDING CONCEPTS PVT. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE- 5(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

undisclosed income was found during search and accordingly, to the extent of ₹.93,100/- was added back to the income of the assessee and further, Assessing Officer observed that assessee was holding various flats / shops / offices as closing stock. In the post search proceedings, assessee was asked to furnish year wise details of stock in trade of the fully constructed

MORAJ BUILDING CONCEPTS PVT.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIR -5(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

undisclosed income was found during search and accordingly, to the extent of ₹.93,100/- was added back to the income of the assessee and further, Assessing Officer observed that assessee was holding various flats / shops / offices as closing stock. In the post search proceedings, assessee was asked to furnish year wise details of stock in trade of the fully constructed

MORAJ BUILDING CONCEPTS PVT. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENT. CIR -5(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

undisclosed income was found during search and accordingly, to the extent of ₹.93,100/- was added back to the income of the assessee and further, Assessing Officer observed that assessee was holding various flats / shops / offices as closing stock. In the post search proceedings, assessee was asked to furnish year wise details of stock in trade of the fully constructed

MORAZ BUILDING CONCEPTS PVT. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENT CIR 5(2), `MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

undisclosed income was found during search and accordingly, to the extent of ₹.93,100/- was added back to the income of the assessee and further, Assessing Officer observed that assessee was holding various flats / shops / offices as closing stock. In the post search proceedings, assessee was asked to furnish year wise details of stock in trade of the fully constructed

SARITA SUNIL MANTRI,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for stati...

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Assessment Year: 2013-14 Sarita Sunil Mantri, Ito-7(2)(1), Flat 3 & 4, Kamal Building, Aayakar Bhavan, 69 Walkeshwar Road, Opp. Vs. Mumbai-400020. Gopi Birla School, Walkeshwar, Mumbai-400006. Pan No. Adxpm 8070 E Appellant Respondent : Assessee By Mr. Abhishek Jhunjhunwala, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Aditya Rai, Dr : Date Of Hearing 17/01/2023 : Date Of Pronouncement 19/01/2023

property ought to have been allowed for set-off us.71B with the renta income of impugned year with the renta income of impugned year 2.0 On facts and On facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT(A) erred in not allowing the interest u/s.24(b) on housing

SUMAN GUPTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT - CC- 4(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2015

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Ita Nos. 3860 & 3859/Mum/2018 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Smt. Suman Gupta, Dy. Cit Cc-4(2), 6Th New Harileela House, Air India Building, 19Th Mint Road, Fort, Vs. Floor, Room No. 1918, Mumbai-400 001. Nariman Point, Mumbai-21. Pan No. Ahqpg 0220 P Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Bhupendra Karkhanis & Mr. Aakash Marthak & Mr. Vijay Bhatt, Ars Revenue By : Dr. Kishor Dhule, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 02/03/2023 : Date Of Pronouncement 27/04/2023 Order

undisclosed income against jewellery y was wrongly declared by the assessee declared by the assessee, therefore, income to that extent should be herefore, income to that extent should be reduced while assessment while assessment. However, this claim of the assessee was . However, this claim of the assessee was Smt. Suman Gupta ITA Nos. 3860 & 3859/M/2018 not accepted by the Assessing