ARIHANT DEVELOPERS,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1, KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

houses and let them to tenants and whose sole business was\nmanagement and collection of rents from the said properties, was held\nassessable under Section 9

ARIHANT DEVELOPERS,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1 , KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

houses and let them to tenants and whose sole business was\nmanagement and collection of rents from the said properties, was held\nassessable under Section 9

ASST CIT CC 8(4), MUMBAI vs. PHOENIX MILLS LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

section 143(3) that AO after considering all the aspects disallowed expenditure by observing that expenses were incurred for earning income from house property. 13. Assessment completed u/s 153A r.w.s.143(3) on 29.12.2010 determining total income at Rs.20,85,10,410/- as against the returned income of Rs.18,51,02,165/-. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened by issue of notice

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

section 143(3) that AO after considering all the aspects disallowed expenditure by observing that expenses were incurred for earning income from house property. 13. Assessment completed u/s 153A r.w.s.143(3) on 29.12.2010 determining total income at Rs.20,85,10,410/- as against the returned income of Rs.18,51,02,165/-. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened by issue of notice

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

section 143(3) that AO after considering all the aspects disallowed expenditure by observing that expenses were incurred for earning income from house property. 13. Assessment completed u/s 153A r.w.s.143(3) on 29.12.2010 determining total income at Rs.20,85,10,410/- as against the returned income of Rs.18,51,02,165/-. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened by issue of notice

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

section 143(3) that AO after considering all the aspects disallowed expenditure by observing that expenses were incurred for earning income from house property. 13. Assessment completed u/s 153A r.w.s.143(3) on 29.12.2010 determining total income at Rs.20,85,10,410/- as against the returned income of Rs.18,51,02,165/-. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened by issue of notice

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

section 143(3) that AO after considering all the aspects disallowed expenditure by observing that expenses were incurred for earning income from house property. 13. Assessment completed u/s 153A r.w.s.143(3) on 29.12.2010 determining total income at Rs.20,85,10,410/- as against the returned income of Rs.18,51,02,165/-. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened by issue of notice

ASST CIT CC 8(4), MUMBAI vs. PHOENIX MILLS LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

section 143(3) that AO after considering all the aspects disallowed expenditure by observing that expenses were incurred for earning income from house property. 13. Assessment completed u/s 153A r.w.s.143(3) on 29.12.2010 determining total income at Rs.20,85,10,410/- as against the returned income of Rs.18,51,02,165/-. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened by issue of notice

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

section 143(3) that AO after considering all the aspects disallowed expenditure by observing that expenses were incurred for earning income from house property. 13. Assessment completed u/s 153A r.w.s.143(3) on 29.12.2010 determining total income at Rs.20,85,10,410/- as against the returned income of Rs.18,51,02,165/-. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened by issue of notice

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

section 143(3) that AO after considering all the aspects disallowed expenditure by observing that expenses were incurred for earning income from house property. 13. Assessment completed u/s 153A r.w.s.143(3) on 29.12.2010 determining total income at Rs.20,85,10,410/- as against the returned income of Rs.18,51,02,165/-. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened by issue of notice

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

section 143(3) that AO after considering all the aspects disallowed expenditure by observing that expenses were incurred for earning income from house property. 13. Assessment completed u/s 153A r.w.s.143(3) on 29.12.2010 determining total income at Rs.20,85,10,410/- as against the returned income of Rs.18,51,02,165/-. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened by issue of notice

ILJIN ELECTRIC CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (IT) CIR 2(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal for A

Bench: Shri Jason P. Boaz, Accoutant Member & Shri Saktijit Dey

property in goods as well as the payment, were carried on outside the Indian soil, the transaction could not have been taxed in India. (3) The principle of apportionment, wherein the territorial jurisdiction of a particular state determines its capacity to tax an event, has to be followed. (4) The fact that the contract was signed in India

MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

section 68 of the income tax act the main submission of the assessee are as under:- i. The loan received by the assessee from sunrise Asian Ltd of ₹ 40 lakhs on 30/9/2013 is a genuine loan and out of the accounted source of the lender company. ITA No. 2089, 709 to 713 & 718 Mum/2023

MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

section 68 of the income tax act the main submission of the assessee are as under:- i. The loan received by the assessee from sunrise Asian Ltd of ₹ 40 lakhs on 30/9/2013 is a genuine loan and out of the accounted source of the lender company. ITA No. 2089, 709 to 713 & 718 Mum/2023

MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

section 68 of the income tax act the main submission of the assessee are as under:- i. The loan received by the assessee from sunrise Asian Ltd of ₹ 40 lakhs on 30/9/2013 is a genuine loan and out of the accounted source of the lender company. ITA No. 2089, 709 to 713 & 718 Mum/2023

MOHAN THANKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

section 68 of the income tax act the main submission of the assessee are as under:- i. The loan received by the assessee from sunrise Asian Ltd of ₹ 40 lakhs on 30/9/2013 is a genuine loan and out of the accounted source of the lender company. ITA No. 2089, 709 to 713 & 718 Mum/2023

MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

section 68 of the income tax act the main submission of the assessee are as under:- i. The loan received by the assessee from sunrise Asian Ltd of ₹ 40 lakhs on 30/9/2013 is a genuine loan and out of the accounted source of the lender company. ITA No. 2089, 709 to 713 & 718 Mum/2023

MOHAN GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRLE - 5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

section 68 of the income tax act the main submission of the assessee are as under:- i. The loan received by the assessee from sunrise Asian Ltd of ₹ 40 lakhs on 30/9/2013 is a genuine loan and out of the accounted source of the lender company. ITA No. 2089, 709 to 713 & 718 Mum/2023