ARIHANT DEVELOPERS,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1 , KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

section 22 of the\nIncome tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as 'the Act') and the rental\nincome chargeable tax under the head ‘Income from house property’. [CIT\nv Ansal Housing Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd (2016) 72

ARIHANT DEVELOPERS,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1, KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

section 22 of the\nIncome tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as 'the Act') and the rental\nincome chargeable tax under the head ‘Income from house property’. [CIT\nv Ansal Housing Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd (2016) 72

MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

house property, disallowance of exemption under section 10 (38) of the act and addition on account of undisclosed income. 014. Assessment proceedings can be summarized as under:- Assessment Date of Returned Return Income Income year filing of income filed returned assessed as return of under under per (in Rupees) income section section assessment under 153A of 153A of the order

MOHAN GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRLE - 5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

house property, disallowance of exemption under section 10 (38) of the act and addition on account of undisclosed income. 014. Assessment proceedings can be summarized as under:- Assessment Date of Returned Return Income Income year filing of income filed returned assessed as return of under under per (in Rupees) income section section assessment under 153A of 153A of the order

MOHAN THANKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

house property, disallowance of exemption under section 10 (38) of the act and addition on account of undisclosed income. 014. Assessment proceedings can be summarized as under:- Assessment Date of Returned Return Income Income year filing of income filed returned assessed as return of under under per (in Rupees) income section section assessment under 153A of 153A of the order

MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

house property, disallowance of exemption under section 10 (38) of the act and addition on account of undisclosed income. 014. Assessment proceedings can be summarized as under:- Assessment Date of Returned Return Income Income year filing of income filed returned assessed as return of under under per (in Rupees) income section section assessment under 153A of 153A of the order

MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

house property, disallowance of exemption under section 10 (38) of the act and addition on account of undisclosed income. 014. Assessment proceedings can be summarized as under:- Assessment Date of Returned Return Income Income year filing of income filed returned assessed as return of under under per (in Rupees) income section section assessment under 153A of 153A of the order

MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

house property, disallowance of exemption under section 10 (38) of the act and addition on account of undisclosed income. 014. Assessment proceedings can be summarized as under:- Assessment Date of Returned Return Income Income year filing of income filed returned assessed as return of under under per (in Rupees) income section section assessment under 153A of 153A of the order

MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

house property, disallowance of exemption under section 10 (38) of the act and addition on account of undisclosed income. 014. Assessment proceedings can be summarized as under:- Assessment Date of Returned Return Income Income year filing of income filed returned assessed as return of under under per (in Rupees) income section section assessment under 153A of 153A of the order

H & M HOUSING FINANCE AND LEASING PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 7(1)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, ground No. 1 and 2 of the assessee‟s appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhanassessment Year : 2017-18 H&M Housing Finance & Deputy Commissioner Of Leasing Private Limited, Income Tax, C/62, 9Th Floor, Vibgyor Towers, Vs. Circle–7(1)(2), Bandra Kurla Complex, Aayakar Bhavan, Bandra (East), M.K.Road, Mumbai-400051. Mumbai-400020. Pan : Aabch4398E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Nitesh Joshi & Shri Nishith Khatri Revenue By : Shri Hemanshu Joshi, Sr.Dr

section 9 and taxed accordingly”. This judgment, supported by earlier cases like United 7 Commercial Bank Ltd. vs. CIT (32 ITR 688) and others, and aligns with rulings from House of Lords in the case of Fry v. Salisbury House Estates Co. Ltd. (1930) AC 432 and Hon‟ble Calcutta High Court in Commercial Properties Limited

ACIT 28 (2), MUMBAI vs. SMT. PUNITA SANJAY BIDRA , MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2012-13 Acit-28(2), Smt. Punita Sanjay Bindra, Room No. 307, 3Rd Floor, Tower 505-506, Kesar Solitaire, 5Th Vs. No. 6, Vashi Railway Station Floor, Sanpada, Plot No. 5, Complex, Vashi, Sector-19, Navi Mumbai-400703. Navi Mumbai-400705. Pan No. Acspb 2454 M Appellant Respondent

section 54F claimed by the assessee has been summarised by the Assessing Officer been summarised by the Assessing Officer as under: as under: Smt. Punita Sanjay Bindra. 4 Smt. Punita Sanjay Bindra ITA No. Rs. Rs. Rs. Consideration received on 30.04.2011 Consideration received on 30.04.2011 6,38,97,750 Invested in house property and claimed deduction u/s Invested in house

DIRECTI INTERNET SOLUTIONS PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 5(1)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail ()

72 taxmann.com 149 (SC) has affirmed the decision of the has affirmed the decision of the Directi Internet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Directi ITA Nos. 3019 & 3018/M/2023 Hon’ble Supreme Court in Chennai Properties & Investments Ltd. Hon’ble Supreme Court in Chennai Properties & Investments Ltd. Hon’ble Supreme Court in Chennai Properties & Investments Ltd. (supra). 8.3 We have perused the memorandum

DIRECTI INTERNET SOLUTIONS PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 5(1)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail ()

72 taxmann.com 149 (SC) has affirmed the decision of the has affirmed the decision of the Directi Internet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Directi ITA Nos. 3019 & 3018/M/2023 Hon’ble Supreme Court in Chennai Properties & Investments Ltd. Hon’ble Supreme Court in Chennai Properties & Investments Ltd. Hon’ble Supreme Court in Chennai Properties & Investments Ltd. (supra). 8.3 We have perused the memorandum

MODERN ABODES PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 12(3)(4) , MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Blemodern Abodes Pvt. Ltd., V. Income Tax Officer – 12(3)(4) C/O. Gulabani & Co. Room No. 148, Aayakar Bhavan M.K. Road, Mumbai - 400020 506, 5Th Floor Shree Prasad House 35Th Road, Off. Linking Road Bandra (W), Mumbai - 400050 Pan: Aagcm1595B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented By : Ms. Neelam Jadhav Shri Ashish Kumar Deharia Department Represented By :

House Property, Hence, addition of Rs.60,000/- and Rs.12,72,949/- may directed to be deleted. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case no addition on account of deemed rental income could be made in respect of unsold stock for AY 2014-2015. As the amendment had been brought in statute in section

SUMAN GUPTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT - CC- 4(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2015

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Ita Nos. 3860 & 3859/Mum/2018 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Smt. Suman Gupta, Dy. Cit Cc-4(2), 6Th New Harileela House, Air India Building, 19Th Mint Road, Fort, Vs. Floor, Room No. 1918, Mumbai-400 001. Nariman Point, Mumbai-21. Pan No. Ahqpg 0220 P Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Bhupendra Karkhanis & Mr. Aakash Marthak & Mr. Vijay Bhatt, Ars Revenue By : Dr. Kishor Dhule, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 02/03/2023 : Date Of Pronouncement 27/04/2023 Order

houses had been let. Smt. Suman Gupta ITA Nos. 3860 & 3859/M/2018 (5) Where the property consisting of any building or land (5) Where the property consisting of any building or land (5) Where the property consisting of any building or land appurtenant thereto is held as st appurtenant thereto is held as stock-in-trade and the trade

DCIT -CC-5(4), MUMBAI vs. RAGHULEELA ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and Cross Objections of the assessee are allowed

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

section 24(b) of the Act to the extent of Interest bearing borrowed funds were used for the construction/acquisition of the property. Initial loans for constructing/acquiring the property were taken from HDFC Ltd. The total borrowed funds utilized for the properties was Rs 360,045,000, Subsequently the Loans were replaced by Loan taken from India Bulls Financial Services (IBFS

DCIT-CC-5(4), MUMBAI vs. RAGHULEELA ESTATES PVT LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and Cross Objections of the assessee are allowed

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

section 24(b) of the Act to the extent of Interest bearing borrowed funds were used for the construction/acquisition of the property. Initial loans for constructing/acquiring the property were taken from HDFC Ltd. The total borrowed funds utilized for the properties was Rs 360,045,000, Subsequently the Loans were replaced by Loan taken from India Bulls Financial Services (IBFS

DCIT-CC-5(4), MUMBAI vs. RAGHULEELA ESTATES PVT LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and Cross Objections of the assessee are allowed

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

section 24(b) of the Act to the extent of Interest bearing borrowed funds were used for the construction/acquisition of the property. Initial loans for constructing/acquiring the property were taken from HDFC Ltd. The total borrowed funds utilized for the properties was Rs 360,045,000, Subsequently the Loans were replaced by Loan taken from India Bulls Financial Services (IBFS