ARIHANT DEVELOPERS,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1, KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

Section\n23 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) if income is assessable as “ Income From\nHouse Property\".\n3. As far as the first issue is concerned, It is squarely covered by the\nJudgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of East India Housing\nand Land Development Trust V/s CIT, 42 ITR 49

ARIHANT DEVELOPERS,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1, KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

Section\n23 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) if income is assessable as “ Income From\nHouse Property\".\n3. As far as the first issue is concerned, It is squarely covered by the\nJudgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of East India Housing\nand Land Development Trust V/s CIT, 42 ITR 49

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

49 M/s. The Phoenix Mills Ltd. 111. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the Assessing Officer has not justified in disallowing the security charges by reallocating the same to income from house property. 112. AO has also made disallowance under Section

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

49 M/s. The Phoenix Mills Ltd. 111. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the Assessing Officer has not justified in disallowing the security charges by reallocating the same to income from house property. 112. AO has also made disallowance under Section

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

49 M/s. The Phoenix Mills Ltd. 111. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the Assessing Officer has not justified in disallowing the security charges by reallocating the same to income from house property. 112. AO has also made disallowance under Section

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

49 M/s. The Phoenix Mills Ltd. 111. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the Assessing Officer has not justified in disallowing the security charges by reallocating the same to income from house property. 112. AO has also made disallowance under Section

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

49 M/s. The Phoenix Mills Ltd. 111. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the Assessing Officer has not justified in disallowing the security charges by reallocating the same to income from house property. 112. AO has also made disallowance under Section

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

49 M/s. The Phoenix Mills Ltd. 111. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the Assessing Officer has not justified in disallowing the security charges by reallocating the same to income from house property. 112. AO has also made disallowance under Section

ASST CIT CC 8(4), MUMBAI vs. PHOENIX MILLS LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

49 M/s. The Phoenix Mills Ltd. 111. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the Assessing Officer has not justified in disallowing the security charges by reallocating the same to income from house property. 112. AO has also made disallowance under Section

ASST CIT CC 8(4), MUMBAI vs. PHOENIX MILLS LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

49 M/s. The Phoenix Mills Ltd. 111. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the Assessing Officer has not justified in disallowing the security charges by reallocating the same to income from house property. 112. AO has also made disallowance under Section

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

49 M/s. The Phoenix Mills Ltd. 111. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the Assessing Officer has not justified in disallowing the security charges by reallocating the same to income from house property. 112. AO has also made disallowance under Section

MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

49 of his fact sheet. The learned authorized representative states that the appellant has requested for issue of summons under section 131 or notices under section 133 (6) to the various persons whose ITA No. 2089, 709 to 713 & 718 Mum/2023 A.Y. 2010-11, 14-15, 11-12, 12-13, 13-14, 15-16, 16-17 Mohan Thakurdas Guranani alleged

MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

49 of his fact sheet. The learned authorized representative states that the appellant has requested for issue of summons under section 131 or notices under section 133 (6) to the various persons whose ITA No. 2089, 709 to 713 & 718 Mum/2023 A.Y. 2010-11, 14-15, 11-12, 12-13, 13-14, 15-16, 16-17 Mohan Thakurdas Guranani alleged

MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

49 of his fact sheet. The learned authorized representative states that the appellant has requested for issue of summons under section 131 or notices under section 133 (6) to the various persons whose ITA No. 2089, 709 to 713 & 718 Mum/2023 A.Y. 2010-11, 14-15, 11-12, 12-13, 13-14, 15-16, 16-17 Mohan Thakurdas Guranani alleged

MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

49 of his fact sheet. The learned authorized representative states that the appellant has requested for issue of summons under section 131 or notices under section 133 (6) to the various persons whose ITA No. 2089, 709 to 713 & 718 Mum/2023 A.Y. 2010-11, 14-15, 11-12, 12-13, 13-14, 15-16, 16-17 Mohan Thakurdas Guranani alleged

MOHAN GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRLE - 5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

49 of his fact sheet. The learned authorized representative states that the appellant has requested for issue of summons under section 131 or notices under section 133 (6) to the various persons whose ITA No. 2089, 709 to 713 & 718 Mum/2023 A.Y. 2010-11, 14-15, 11-12, 12-13, 13-14, 15-16, 16-17 Mohan Thakurdas Guranani alleged

MOHAN THAKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

49 of his fact sheet. The learned authorized representative states that the appellant has requested for issue of summons under section 131 or notices under section 133 (6) to the various persons whose ITA No. 2089, 709 to 713 & 718 Mum/2023 A.Y. 2010-11, 14-15, 11-12, 12-13, 13-14, 15-16, 16-17 Mohan Thakurdas Guranani alleged

MOHAN THANKURDAS GURNANI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-5(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for assessment year 2014 – 15 also

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

49 of his fact sheet. The learned authorized representative states that the appellant has requested for issue of summons under section 131 or notices under section 133 (6) to the various persons whose ITA No. 2089, 709 to 713 & 718 Mum/2023 A.Y. 2010-11, 14-15, 11-12, 12-13, 13-14, 15-16, 16-17 Mohan Thakurdas Guranani alleged