BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “house property”+ Section 43Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka47Telangana15Mumbai11Delhi8Kolkata3Bangalore3Jaipur1SC1Chennai1

Key Topics

Section 41(1)11Section 143(3)11Section 14A10Disallowance9Addition to Income9Section 36(1)(iii)8Deduction6Section 234D4Section 144C4

THE SHIPPING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADDL.C.I.T. LTU, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes, while the appeal by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2550/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Mar 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi, Ms. Akshaya IyerFor Respondent: Ms. Richa Gulati
Section 234DSection 250Section 41(1)

43C of the Act. For the year under consideration, the assessee filed its return of income on 30/09/2008 declaring a total income of Rs. 245,70,05,370. The return filed by the assessee was initially processed under section 143(1) of the Act. Thereafter, the return of income was selected for scrutiny and statutory notices under section

ADDL CIT LTU, MUMBAI vs. THE SHIPPING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD, MUMBAI

Section 2502
Section 144B2
Business Income2

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes, while the appeal by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2130/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Mar 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi, Ms. Akshaya IyerFor Respondent: Ms. Richa Gulati
Section 234DSection 250Section 41(1)

43C of the Act. For the year under consideration, the assessee filed its return of income on 30/09/2008 declaring a total income of Rs. 245,70,05,370. The return filed by the assessee was initially processed under section 143(1) of the Act. Thereafter, the return of income was selected for scrutiny and statutory notices under section

DCIT-2(3)(1), MUMBAI vs. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 4103/MUM/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Jan 2025AY 2019-20
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 41(1)

house property at Kolkata was\nvalued Rs 11,55,19,784/- by stamp value authorities.The valuation report\nclearly showed that the property was old since it was purchased in 1996\nand heavy repairs were needed.The assessee proposed to make a distress\nsale at lesser value of Rs 7 cr. to one Deepak Builder P.Ltd.The property\nconsisted of 32 flats. Copy

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT-3(2)(2), ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPT, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3754/MUM/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Jan 2025AY 2019-20
For Appellant: \nShri Madhur Agrawal a/w Shri Bhargav ParekhFor Respondent: \nShri Biswanath Das (CIT DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 41(1)

house property at Kolkata was\nvalued Rs 11,55,19,784/- by stamp value authorities.The valuation report\nclearly showed that the property was old since it was purchased in 1996\nand heavy repairs were needed.The assessee proposed to make a distress\nsale at lesser value of Rs 7 cr. to one Deepak Builder P.Ltd.The property\nconsisted of 32 flats. Copy

TOLANI SHIPPING CO. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT,CIR-5(3)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, this appeal by the assessee for A

ITA 6730/MUM/2018[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Mar 2021AY 2004-05
Section 10(33)Section 143(3)Section 14A

property amounting to Rs. 11,91,92,670/- cannot be considered for disallowance under the provision of 14A. That the same generate taxable income. He held that this assertion of the assessee needs verification. Therefore he directed the Assessing Officer to verify this fact and compute disallowance u/s. 14A @ 0.5% of the average value of investment. 6. Against this order

DCIT CENT. CIR. -7(3), MUMBAI vs. PALAVA DWELLERS PVT. LTD. , MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2147/MUM/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Feb 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon'Bledy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax V. M/S. Palava Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., Central Circle – 7(3) 412, 71-G, Vardhman Chamber Room No. 655, 6Th Floor C.P. Road, Horniman Circle Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Fort, Mumbai Mumbai – 400 020 Pan: Aabcl1117D (Appellant) (Respondent) Lodha Developers Limited Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax V. {Since Merged M/S. Palava Dwellers Pvt. Ltd.,} Central Circle – 7(3) 412, 4Th Floor, 17G, Vardhman Chamber Room No. 655, 6Th Floor Cawasji Patel Road, Horniman Circle Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Fort, Mumbai - 400 001 Mumbai – 400 020 Pan: Aabcl1117D (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Rajan R. VoraFor Respondent: Shri Awungshi Gimson
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(iii)

43C 0.0058 Crores Interest on delayed payment of TDS 0.1284 Crores Interest on Income Tax 0.0069 Crores Total 4.0572 Crores 19. Ld. Counsel for the assessee further submitted that the Assessing Officer ignored following deductions claimed by assessee in the revised return filed: Reduction in 14A disallowances 0.295 Crores Additional deduction claimed under 7.87 Crores section

LODHA DEVELOPERS LTD(FORMERLY KNOWN AS LODHA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED),MUMBAI vs. DCIT CEN CIR 7(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2348/MUM/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Feb 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon'Bledy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax V. M/S. Palava Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., Central Circle – 7(3) 412, 71-G, Vardhman Chamber Room No. 655, 6Th Floor C.P. Road, Horniman Circle Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Fort, Mumbai Mumbai – 400 020 Pan: Aabcl1117D (Appellant) (Respondent) Lodha Developers Limited Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax V. {Since Merged M/S. Palava Dwellers Pvt. Ltd.,} Central Circle – 7(3) 412, 4Th Floor, 17G, Vardhman Chamber Room No. 655, 6Th Floor Cawasji Patel Road, Horniman Circle Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Fort, Mumbai - 400 001 Mumbai – 400 020 Pan: Aabcl1117D (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Rajan R. VoraFor Respondent: Shri Awungshi Gimson
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(iii)

43C 0.0058 Crores Interest on delayed payment of TDS 0.1284 Crores Interest on Income Tax 0.0069 Crores Total 4.0572 Crores 19. Ld. Counsel for the assessee further submitted that the Assessing Officer ignored following deductions claimed by assessee in the revised return filed: Reduction in 14A disallowances 0.295 Crores Additional deduction claimed under 7.87 Crores section

THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT RG 5(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the learned assessing officer is dismissed

ITA 1656/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Sept 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm The Great Eastern Shipping Co. The Dy. Commissioner Of Ltd. Income-Tax, Kalyaniwalla & Mistry Llp Range-5(3), Esplanade House, 2 Nd Floor, Vs. Room No.525B, 5Th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Fort, Mumbai-400 001 Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaact1565C The Dy. Commissioner Of The Great Eastern Shipping Income-Tax, Co. Ltd. Range-5(3), Kalyaniwalla & Mistry Llp Vs. Esplanade House, 2 Nd Floor, Room No.525B, 5Th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Mumbai-400 020 Fort, Mumbai-400 001 (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Mishra, CIT DR
Section 115Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 14A

House, 2 nd floor, Room No.525B, 5th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Mumbai-400 020 Fort, Mumbai-400 001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Jitendra Jain, Advocate Shri Falee H Bilimoria, Shri Akram Khan Ms.Yasmin Dastur, Shri Hormuzd Jamshedji, ARs Revenue by : Shri Manoj Mishra, CIT DR Date of hearing 25.08.2023 Date of pronouncement 13.09.2023 ITA Nos. 3272/Mum/2015

DCIT 5(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO.LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the learned assessing officer is dismissed

ITA 3272/MUM/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Sept 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm The Great Eastern Shipping Co. The Dy. Commissioner Of Ltd. Income-Tax, Kalyaniwalla & Mistry Llp Range-5(3), Esplanade House, 2 Nd Floor, Vs. Room No.525B, 5Th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Fort, Mumbai-400 001 Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaact1565C The Dy. Commissioner Of The Great Eastern Shipping Income-Tax, Co. Ltd. Range-5(3), Kalyaniwalla & Mistry Llp Vs. Esplanade House, 2 Nd Floor, Room No.525B, 5Th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Mumbai-400 020 Fort, Mumbai-400 001 (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Mishra, CIT DR
Section 115Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 14A

House, 2 nd floor, Room No.525B, 5th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Mumbai-400 020 Fort, Mumbai-400 001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Jitendra Jain, Advocate Shri Falee H Bilimoria, Shri Akram Khan Ms.Yasmin Dastur, Shri Hormuzd Jamshedji, ARs Revenue by : Shri Manoj Mishra, CIT DR Date of hearing 25.08.2023 Date of pronouncement 13.09.2023 ITA Nos. 3272/Mum/2015

DCIT(CC)-8(3), MUMBAI vs. LOKHANDWALA KATARIA CONSTRUCTION (PVT) LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are allowed

ITA 3878/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

For Respondent: Mr. Dharmesh Shah &
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)

Housing Finance Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ‘India Bulls’) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ‘India Bulls’) for the purpose of for the purpose of construction and out of that interest free advance of Rs. 107.5 construction and out of that interest free advance of Rs. 107.5 construction and out of that interest free advance of Rs. 107.5 crores has been

DCIT(CC)-8(3), MUMBAI vs. LOKHANDWALA KATARIA CONSTRUCTION (PVT) LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are allowed

ITA 3879/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

For Respondent: Mr. Dharmesh Shah &
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)

Housing Finance Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ‘India Bulls’) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ‘India Bulls’) for the purpose of for the purpose of construction and out of that interest free advance of Rs. 107.5 construction and out of that interest free advance of Rs. 107.5 construction and out of that interest free advance of Rs. 107.5 crores has been