BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “house property”+ Section 200Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka22Delhi5Mumbai5Visakhapatnam2Jodhpur1Chennai1Jaipur1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 234C8Section 143(1)7Section 2637Section 234E5Section 200A3Section 2343Section 143(3)2Section 115J2TDS2Rectification u/s 154

CROMPTON GREAVES LTD,MUMBAI vs. CIT -6, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee company in ITA no

ITA 2836/MUM/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Feb 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav & Shri Ramit Kochar"ी शैल" कुमार यादव, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी "ी रिमत कोचर, लेखाकार सद"य के सम" । आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1994/Mum/2013 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 2836/Mum/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08) M/S Crompton Greaves बनाम/ Cit – 6,Mumbai, Ltd.,6Th Floor, C.G. House, 5Th Floor, V. Dr. A.B. Road, Worli, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai – 400 030. M.K. Road, Mumbai – 400 020. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan : Aaacc3840K .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Assessee By Shri Pradeep N. Kapasi Revenue By : Shri C.W. Angolkar सुनवाई क" तार"ख /Date Of Hearing : 29-10-2015 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 01-02-2016

For Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar
Section 143(3)Section 263

house property’, in respect of which there was a sharp divergence of opinion amongst the High Courts, was clarificatory and declaratory in nature and consequently retrospective. Similarly , in Brij Mohan Das Laxman Das v. CIT (1997) 90 Taxman 41(SC), explanation 2 added to section 40 of the Act was held to be declaratory in nature and , therefore , retrospective.(Reference

2
Deduction2

DADIBA KALI PUNDOLE ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMEM TAX -17(1), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3265/MUM/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Jul 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Shri Amey Wagle & Shri AzimFor Respondent: 07.07.2025
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 194QSection 234Section 234CSection 246ASection 250

200A or sub-section (1) of section 206CB, where the assessee or the deductor or the collector objects to the making of adjustments, or any order of assessment under sub-section (3) of section 143 except an order passed in pursuance of directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel or an order referred to in sub-section (12) of section 144BA

SHANTILAL CHIMANLAL SHETH,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (TDS) - CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6447/MUM/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Jan 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh (Jm) & Shri S.Rifaur Rahman(A.M.) Shantilal Chimanlal Sheth Vs Acit(Tds)- Cpcp- Gaziabad Office No.9, 3Rd Floor, Chenmox House, Barrack Road, Bombay Hospital Lane, Mumbai 400 020 Pan : Aaops0258F Appellant Respondednt

Section 200Section 200ASection 234Section 234E

House, Barrack Road, Bombay Hospital Lane, Mumbai 400 020 PAN : AAOPS0258F APPELLANT RESPONDEDNT Appellant by None Respondent by Shri Vinod Kumar Date of hearing 14-01-2020 Date of pronouncement 14-01-2020 O R D E R PER PAWAN SINGH, JM : 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of CIT(A)-16, Mumbai dated

TATA EDUCATION TRUST ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 1221/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Aug 2024AY 2021-22
For Appellant: \n1. \"A) On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law
Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 244ASection 245Section 250Section 80G

House,\nIncome Tax Circle- 26(1)\n24 Homi Mody Street,\nKautilya Bhavan,\nFort, Mumbai- 400001.\nVs.\nBandra Kurla Complex,\nPAN: AAATT9835A\nBandra (East),\n(Appellant)\nMumbai- 400051.\n(Respondent)\nPresent for :\nAssessee by\nShri P. J. Pardiwala/ Shri. Sukhsagar Syal & Shri\nAtul Suraiya, A.R.\nRevenue by\nShri P. D. Chougule (Addl. CIT) SR. D.R.\nDate of Hearing\n10.07.2024\nDate

DCIT CIR 6(1), MUMBAI vs. BOROSIL GLASS WORKS LTD, MUMBAI

In the result the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 6583/MUM/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Jun 2016AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.6583/Mum/2014 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12) Dy. Commissioner Of Income बनधम/ M/S Borosil Glass Works Ltd, 4Th Floor, Khanna Const. House- Tax Circle 6(1) R No.506, Vs. 44 Dr R G Thandani Marg, 5Th Floor, Ayakar Bhavan, Worli, M K Road, Mumbai-400018 Mumbai-400020 स्थधयी ऱेखध सं./ Pan : Aaacb5484G अपीऱार्थी ओर से / Revenue By Shrimati Bharti Singh प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By Shri Vijay Mehta सुनवाई की तायीख / Date Of Hearing : 25.5.2016 घोषणा की तायीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 15.6.2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, A. M: This Appeal By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 12.8.2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-14, Mumbai (Hereinafter Called As The Cit(A) For Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. Only Issue Raised In The Grounds Of Appeal Relates To Wrongful Adjudication Of Levy Of Interest Of Rs.71,64,280/- U/S 234C Dehors The Rules, Which Was Not 2 6583/Mum/2013

Section 115Section 115JSection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234CSection 246

House- Tax circle 6(1) R No.506, Vs. 44 Dr R G Thandani Marg, 5th floor, Ayakar Bhavan, Worli, M K Road, Mumbai-400018 Mumbai-400020 स्थधयी ऱेखध सं./ PAN : AAACB5484G अपीऱार्थी ओर से / Revenue by Shrimati Bharti Singh प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से/ Assessee by Shri Vijay Mehta सुनवाई की तायीख / Date of Hearing : 25.5.2016 घोषणा की तायीख /Date