THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

house property income, when the said issue is already a subject matter of an appeal at the time of issue the notice u/s 148 of the Act. Accordingly, it is prayed that said reopening is in violation of express third proviso to section 147. Thus, the reassessment order is consequently bad in law, illegal and otherwise void. Ground

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

house property income, when the said issue is already a subject matter of an appeal at the time of issue the notice u/s 148 of the Act. Accordingly, it is prayed that said reopening is in violation of express third proviso to section 147. Thus, the reassessment order is consequently bad in law, illegal and otherwise void. Ground

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

house property income, when the said issue is already a subject matter of an appeal at the time of issue the notice u/s 148 of the Act. Accordingly, it is prayed that said reopening is in violation of express third proviso to section 147. Thus, the reassessment order is consequently bad in law, illegal and otherwise void. Ground

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

house property income, when the said issue is already a subject matter of an appeal at the time of issue the notice u/s 148 of the Act. Accordingly, it is prayed that said reopening is in violation of express third proviso to section 147. Thus, the reassessment order is consequently bad in law, illegal and otherwise void. Ground

ASST CIT CC 8(4), MUMBAI vs. PHOENIX MILLS LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

house property income, when the said issue is already a subject matter of an appeal at the time of issue the notice u/s 148 of the Act. Accordingly, it is prayed that said reopening is in violation of express third proviso to section 147. Thus, the reassessment order is consequently bad in law, illegal and otherwise void. Ground

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

house property income, when the said issue is already a subject matter of an appeal at the time of issue the notice u/s 148 of the Act. Accordingly, it is prayed that said reopening is in violation of express third proviso to section 147. Thus, the reassessment order is consequently bad in law, illegal and otherwise void. Ground

ASST CIT CC 8(4), MUMBAI vs. PHOENIX MILLS LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

house property income, when the said issue is already a subject matter of an appeal at the time of issue the notice u/s 148 of the Act. Accordingly, it is prayed that said reopening is in violation of express third proviso to section 147. Thus, the reassessment order is consequently bad in law, illegal and otherwise void. Ground

ISLAND STAR MALL DEVELOPES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 6(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Br Baskaran & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

164 of the paper book read as under: “”Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the composite rent pertains to letting out of building along with charges for provision of services? Long Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the composite rent pertains to letting out of building along with charges for provision

ISLAND STAR MALL DEVELOPES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 6(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Br Baskaran & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

164 of the paper book read as under: “”Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the composite rent pertains to letting out of building along with charges for provision of services? Long Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the composite rent pertains to letting out of building along with charges for provision

ISLAND STAR MALL DEVELOPES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI SUBURBAN vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 6(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Br Baskaran & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

164 of the paper book read as under: “”Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the composite rent pertains to letting out of building along with charges for provision of services? Long Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the composite rent pertains to letting out of building along with charges for provision

ISLAND STAR MALL DEVELOPES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI SUBURBAN vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 6(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Br Baskaran & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

164 of the paper book read as under: “”Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the composite rent pertains to letting out of building along with charges for provision of services? Long Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the composite rent pertains to letting out of building along with charges for provision

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 6(1)(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S ISLAND STAR MALL DEVELOPERS PVT LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Br Baskaran & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

164 of the paper book read as under: “”Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the composite rent pertains to letting out of building along with charges for provision of services? Long Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the composite rent pertains to letting out of building along with charges for provision

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 6(1)(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S ISLAND STAR MALL DEVELOPERS PVT LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Br Baskaran & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

164 of the paper book read as under: “”Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the composite rent pertains to letting out of building along with charges for provision of services? Long Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the composite rent pertains to letting out of building along with charges for provision

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 6(1)(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S ISLAND STAR MALL DEVELOPERS PVT LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Br Baskaran & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

164 of the paper book read as under: “”Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the composite rent pertains to letting out of building along with charges for provision of services? Long Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the composite rent pertains to letting out of building along with charges for provision

ISLAND STAR MALL DEVELOPES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI SUBURBAN vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 6(3)(1), MUMBAI

164 of the paper book read as\nunder:\n\"\"Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the\ncomposite rent pertains to letting out of building along with\ncharges for provision of services?\nLong Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the\ncomposite rent pertains to letting out of building along with\ncharges for provision

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 6(1)(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S ISLAND STAR MALL DEVELOPERS PVT LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the\nappeal filed by the revenue is dismissed\n35

164 of the paper book read as\nunder:\n\"Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the\ncomposite rent pertains to letting out of building along with\ncharges for provision of services?\nLong Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the\ncomposite rent pertains to letting out of building along with\ncharges for provision

ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 6(1)(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S ISLAND STAR MALL DEVELOPERS PVT LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are\npartly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeals filed\nby the revenue are dismissed

164 of the paper book read as\nunder:\n\"\"Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the\ncomposite rent pertains to letting out of building along with\ncharges for provision of services?\nLong Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the\ncomposite rent pertains to letting out of building along with\ncharges for provision

ISLAND STAR MALL DEVELOPES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI SUBURBAN vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 6(3)(1), MUMBAI

164 of the paper book read as\nunder:\n\"Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the\ncomposite rent pertains to letting out of building along with\ncharges for provision of services?\nLong Title: What is the tax treatment of composite rent when the\ncomposite rent pertains to letting out of building along with\ncharges for provision