BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “disallowance”+ Section 35B(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai11Delhi10Ahmedabad8Pune6SC5Jaipur5Jabalpur1Chandigarh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Addition to Income11Section 14A10Section 92C(2)10Transfer Pricing10Double Taxation/DTAA10Disallowance10Comparables/TP10Section 1543

YASH DEVELOPERS,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 27(3) , MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3217/MUM/2022[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Mar 2023AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale () Assessment Year: 2009-10 Yash Developers, Dcit-27(3), 1St Flr Anand, 7Th Road, 4Th Floor, Tower No. 6, Vashi Maryland Apartment, D.K. Vs. Station Complex, Sandhu Marg, Chembur, Vashi-400703 Mumbai-400071. Pan No. Aaafy 6171 A Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Mandar Vaidya, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Harmesh Lal, Dr : Date Of Hearing 23/02/2023 : Date Of Pronouncement 31/03/2023 Order

For Appellant: Mr. Mandar Vaidya, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Harmesh Lal, DR
Section 154

1 to section 115JB of the Act. The said clause deals with book profit to be incr clause deals with book profit to be increased by the eased by the amounts set aside as provision that diminution in amounts set aside as provision that diminution in amounts set aside as provision that diminution in Yash Developers 15 value

BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA,MUMBAI vs. ADDL DIT (IT) RG 3, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and\nappeals of the revenue are also partly allowed

ITA 4980/MUM/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jan 2024AY 2009-10
For Appellant: \nNishant Thakkar &
Section 14ASection 92C(2)

section 92C(2) of the Act.\nThe Appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or delete the above grounds, at\nor before hearing of the appeal.”\nPage 3\n11 Appeals\nThe Bank of Novascotia Vs. ADIT(IT) 3(2)\n2. The fact in brief is that return of income declaring a total loss of\nRs. 944,90,280/- was filed

ADIT (IT) 3(2), MUMBAI vs. THE BANK NOVA SCOTIA, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and\nappeals of the revenue are also partly allowed

ITA 5634/MUM/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jan 2024AY 2005-06
For Appellant: \nNishant Thakkar &
Section 14ASection 92C(2)

section 92C(2) of the Act.\nThe Appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or delete the above grounds, at\nor before hearing of the appeal.\"\nPage 4\n11 Appeals\nThe Bank of Novascotia Vs. ADIT(IT) 3(2)\n2. The fact in brief is that return of income declaring a total loss of\nRs. 944,90,280/- was filed

THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA,MUMBAI vs. ADDL DIT (IT) RG 3, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and\nappeals of the revenue are also partly allowed

ITA 3862/MUM/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jan 2024AY 2008-09
For Appellant: \nNishant Thakkar &
Section 14ASection 92C(2)

section 92C(2) of the Act.\nThe Appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or delete the above grounds, at\nor before hearing of the appeal.”\nPage 3\n11 Appeals\nThe Bank of Novascotia Vs. ADIT(IT) 3(2)\n2. The fact in brief is that return of income declaring a total loss of\nRs. 944,90,280/- was filed

DCIT (IT) -1(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, MUMBAI

ITA 4898/MUM/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jan 2024AY 2009-10
For Appellant: \nNishant Thakkar &
Section 14ASection 92C(2)

section 92C(2) of the Act.\nThe Appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or delete the above grounds, at\nor before hearing of the appeal.”\nPage 3\n11 Appeals\nThe Bank of Novascotia Vs. ADIT(IT) 3(2)\n2. The fact in brief is that return of income declaring a total loss of\nRs. 944,90,280/- was filed

DDIT (IT) 3(2), MUMBAI vs. THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and appeals of the revenue are also partly allowed

ITA 3828/MUM/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jan 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Amarjit Singhita No.8841/Mum/2010 The Bank Of Nova Scotia Vs. Assistant Director Of Mittal Towers, B Wing Income Tax (It) -3(2) Nariman Point Scindia House Mumbai – 400 020 Ballard Pier Mumbai – 400 038 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aaacb1536H Appellant .. Respondent It(Tp)A. No.3862/Mum/2013 The Bank Of Nova Scotia Vs. Additional Director Of Mittal Towers, B Wing Income Tax (It) -3 Nariman Point Air India Building Mumbai – 400 020 Nariman Point Mumbai – 400 021 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No:Aaacb1536H Appellant .. Respondent Ita.No.3989/Mum/2012 Deputy Director Of Income Vs. M/S The Bank Of Nova Tax (It) -3(2) Scotia, Mittal Towers, B Scindia House Wing, Nariman Point Ballard Pier, N. M. Road Mumbai – 400 021 Mumbai – 400 038

For Appellant: Nishant Thakkar &For Respondent: Anil Sant
Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 92C(2)

section 92C(2) of the Act. The Appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or delete the above grounds, at or before hearing of the appeal.” P a g e | 4 11 Appeals The Bank of Novascotia Vs. ADIT(IT) 3(2) 2. The fact in brief is that return of income declaring a total loss

THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA,MUMBAI vs. ADIT (IT) 3(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and\nappeals of the revenue are also partly allowed

ITA 8841/MUM/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jan 2024AY 2006-07
For Appellant: \nNishant Thakkar &
Section 14ASection 92C(2)

section 92C(2) of the Act.\nThe Appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or delete the above grounds, at\nor before hearing of the appeal.”\nPage 4\n11 Appeals\nThe Bank of Novascotia Vs. ADIT(IT) 3(2)\n2. The fact in brief is that return of income declaring a total loss of\nRs. 944,90,280/- was filed

ADIT CIR 3(2), MUMBAI vs. THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, MUMBAI

ITA 3989/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jan 2024AY 2007-08
For Appellant: \nNishant Thakkar &
Section 14ASection 92C(2)

section 92C(2) of the Act.\nThe Appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or delete the above grounds, at\nor before hearing of the appeal.\"\nPage 4\n11 Appeals\nThe Bank of Novascotia Vs. ADIT(IT) 3(2)\n2. The fact in brief is that return of income declaring a total loss of\nRs. 944,90,280/- was filed

THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT (IT) 3, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and\nappeals of the revenue are also partly allowed

ITA 4036/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jan 2024AY 2007-08
For Appellant: \nNishant Thakkar &
Section 14ASection 92C(2)

section 92C(2) of the Act.\nThe Appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or delete the above grounds, at\nor before hearing of the appeal.”\nPage 4\n11 Appeals\nThe Bank of Novascotia Vs. ADIT(IT) 3(2)\n2. The fact in brief is that return of income declaring a total loss of\nRs. 944,90,280/- was filed

THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA,MUMBAI vs. ADIT (IT) 3(2), MUMBAI

ITA 5740/MUM/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jan 2024AY 2005-06
For Appellant: \nNishant Thakkar &
Section 14ASection 92C(2)

section 92C(2) of the Act.\nThe Appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or delete the above grounds, at\nor before hearing of the appeal.”\nPage 3\n11 Appeals\nThe Bank of Novascotia Vs. ADIT(IT) 3(2)\n2. The fact in brief is that return of income declaring a total loss of\nRs. 944,90,280/- was filed

THE ADIT (IT)-3(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S. THE BANK OF NOVASCOTIA, MUMBAI

ITA 4655/MUM/2007[2003-2004]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jan 2024AY 2003-2004
For Appellant: \nNishant Thakkar &
Section 14ASection 92C(2)

section 92C(2) of the Act.\nThe Appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or delete the above grounds, at\nor before hearing of the appeal.”\nPage 3\n11 Appeals\nThe Bank of Novascotia Vs. ADIT(IT) 3(2)\n2. The fact in brief is that return of income declaring a total loss of\nRs. 944,90,280/- was filed