BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 260C(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3Cuttack2

Key Topics

Section 406Section 36(1)(iii)4Section 133(6)3Addition to Income3Section 143(2)2Section 44A2Section 142(1)2Depreciation2

ACIT 25(2), MUMBAI vs. METCRAFT ENGINEERING CORPORATION, MUMBAI

In the result appeal filed by the revenue is hereby Dismissed

ITA 6232/MUM/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Dec 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri G.S.Pannu, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आयकरअपीलसं/I.T.A. No.6233/Mum/2012 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) Asst. Commissioner Of बनाम/ M/S. Metform Corporation Income Tax 25(2) 601-602, Sidharth Arcade, Vs. C-11, Pratyakshakar Bhavan Lt Road, Borivali(W) R. No.108, Bandra Kurla Mumbai - 400092 Complex, Bandra (East) Mumbai - 400051 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaafm9883D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) .. (""थ" /Respondent)

For Appellant: Dr.K.Shivaram (SeniorFor Respondent: Shri M.Rajan
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 44A

section 36(1)(iii) of the Act to the tune of Rs.3,52,576/- and also and also challenged the deletion of the disallowance of the interest expenditure incurred towards the acquisition of fixed assets to the tune of Rs.7,86,895/-. Before proceeding further the finding of the CIT(A) on the above said issues is hereby reproduced below

ACIT 25(2), MUMBAI vs. METFORM CORPORATION, MUMBAI

In the result appeal filed by the revenue is hereby Dismissed

ITA 6233/MUM/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Dec 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri G.S.Pannu, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आयकरअपीलसं/I.T.A. No.6233/Mum/2012 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) Asst. Commissioner Of बनाम/ M/S. Metform Corporation Income Tax 25(2) 601-602, Sidharth Arcade, Vs. C-11, Pratyakshakar Bhavan Lt Road, Borivali(W) R. No.108, Bandra Kurla Mumbai - 400092 Complex, Bandra (East) Mumbai - 400051 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaafm9883D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) .. (""थ" /Respondent)

For Appellant: Dr.K.Shivaram (SeniorFor Respondent: Shri M.Rajan
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 44A

section 36(1)(iii) of the Act to the tune of Rs.3,52,576/- and also and also challenged the deletion of the disallowance of the interest expenditure incurred towards the acquisition of fixed assets to the tune of Rs.7,86,895/-. Before proceeding further the finding of the CIT(A) on the above said issues is hereby reproduced below

WELSET PLAST EXTRUSIONS P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT (OSD) RG 8(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is accepted for statistical purposes

ITA 77/MUM/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Jan 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.K.Billaiya, Am & Shri Pawan Singh, Jm Welset Plast Extrusions Pvt. Ltd., Acit(Osd), Range-8(1), Room No. 260C, 2Nd Floor, 8, New Metalage Industrial Vs. Premises Co-Op. Society Ltd., Aayakar Bhavan, M.K.Road, Subhash Road, Jogeshwari (E), Mumbai-400020. Mumbai-400060 Pan/Gir No.: Aaacw0614K (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri K. Shivaram & Miss Neelam JadhavFor Respondent: Shri Abani Kanta Nayak (DR)
Section 133(6)Section 194CSection 40Section 40A

260C, 2nd Floor, 8, New Metalage Industrial Vs. Premises Co-op. Society Ltd., Aayakar Bhavan, M.K.Road, Subhash Road, Jogeshwari (E), Mumbai-400020. Mumbai-400060 PAN/GIR No.: AAACW0614K (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri K. Shivaram & Miss Neelam Jadhav. Revenue by : Shri Abani Kanta Nayak (DR) Date of Hearing : 23/11/2015 Date of Pronouncement: 15/01/2016 O R D E R PER PAWAN SINGH