BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 234Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Indore108Raipur8Mumbai6Jaipur4Chennai4Delhi3Bangalore3Kolkata2Lucknow2Ahmedabad1Cochin1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 312Section 80P(2)(d)8Section 234E6Section 46Deduction6Section 201(1)5Section 2015TDS5Disallowance5Section 200A

ALI FAZAL,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS WARD 1(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed, with the above directions

ITA 7430/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Jan 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla& Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokarali Fazal Income Tax Bungalow No.4, Udadhi Officer Tds Ward Tarang Society, Juhu Tara Vs. 1(1)(1) Road, Juhu, Mumbai Room No. 413, 4Th 400049 Floor, Cumbala Hill Mtnl Te Building, Peddar Road, Dr G Deshmukh Marg, Cumbana Hill Mumbai – 400026 Pan/Gir No. Aampf8506G (Applicant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Ashish Thakurdesai & Shri Aditya Desai Revenue By Shri Surendra Mohan (Sr. Dr.) Date Of Hearing 19.01.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 22.01.2026

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 234ESection 250

disallowed 30 percent of the expenditure in the computation of income in accordance with the provisions of the Act and, therefore, to that extent the addition may be sustained and the Assessing Officer may be directed to recompute the liability. 12. As regards fee levied under section 234E

3
Section 260A3
Exemption3

SHRI BRIJKUTIR CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD-19(3)(1), MUMBAI

Accordingly, the same is dismissed

ITA 884/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri. Rajesh ShahFor Respondent: Shri. Himanshu Sharma (CIT DR)
Section 10ASection 139Section 139(1)Section 142Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 234FSection 80P(2)(d)

disallowed on the ground that the return was filed after due date specified in Section 139(1) of the Act. 8. We note that as per Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, for the purpose of claiming deduction under the aforesaid provision interest must be received from a ‘co-operative society’. A co-operative society is defined in Section

ITO(TDS)-2(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. SASHWAT ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, the CO is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4279/MUM/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Jan 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankarincome Tax Officer (Tds) – V/S. Sashwat Energy Private 2(2)(1) बनाम Limited, 3Rd Floor, Mtnl Building, 10Th Floor, Universal Cumballa Hill, Mumbai – Majestic Lokhande Marg, 400 026, Maharashtra Chembur West, Mumbai – 400 043, Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Mums95080G Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी प्रत्याक्षेपसं./C.O. No.273/Mum/2025 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 4279/Mum/2025) (A.Y. 2021-22) Sashwat Energy Private V/S. Income Tax Officer (Tds) – Limited, बनाम 2(2)(1), 3Rd Floor, Mtnl 10Th Floor, Universal Majestic Building, Cumballa Hill, Lokhande Marg, Chembur Mumbai – 400 026, West, Mumbai – 400 043, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Mums95080G Appellant/अपीलाथी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Ms Kinjal Bhuta,ARFor Respondent: Shri Surendra Mohan, (Sr. DR)
Section 133ASection 194ASection 194JSection 200Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40Section 40a

disallowed Rs.9,79,63,500/- u/s 40(a)(ia) on account of non- compliance with the provisions of Chapter XVII-B of the Act @30%. Thus, as per ITR defaults referred u/s 40(a)(ia) on accounts of payments P a g e | 5 CO No. 273/Mum/2025 A.Y. 2021-22 Sashwat Energy Private Limited on which tax was not deducted

M/S. PRIVELEGE REALTORS PVT. LTD.,,MUMBAI vs. ACIT(TDS) CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed as observed above

ITA 1520/MUM/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Feb 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri N.K. Pradhan, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Ms. Bhumika JoshiFor Respondent: Ms. Shreekala Pardeshhi
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 260Section 260ASection 3Section 4Section 54F

234E of the Act while processing quarterly TDS statement and while passing the intimation u/s. 200A of the Act. (A.Y: 2016-17) M/s. Privelege Realtors Pvt. Ltd., 2. At the time of hearing the appeals virtually Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and filed declaration and undertaking in Form-1 and Form

M/S. PRIVELEGE REALTORS PVT. LTD.,,MUMBAI vs. ACIT(TDS) CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed as observed above

ITA 1521/MUM/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Feb 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri N.K. Pradhan, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Ms. Bhumika JoshiFor Respondent: Ms. Shreekala Pardeshhi
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 260Section 260ASection 3Section 4Section 54F

234E of the Act while processing quarterly TDS statement and while passing the intimation u/s. 200A of the Act. (A.Y: 2016-17) M/s. Privelege Realtors Pvt. Ltd., 2. At the time of hearing the appeals virtually Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and filed declaration and undertaking in Form-1 and Form

M/S. PRIVELEGE REALTORS PVT. LTD.,,MUMBAI vs. ACIT(TDS), CPC,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed as observed above

ITA 1522/MUM/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Feb 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri N.K. Pradhan, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Ms. Bhumika JoshiFor Respondent: Ms. Shreekala Pardeshhi
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 260Section 260ASection 3Section 4Section 54F

234E of the Act while processing quarterly TDS statement and while passing the intimation u/s. 200A of the Act. (A.Y: 2016-17) M/s. Privelege Realtors Pvt. Ltd., 2. At the time of hearing the appeals virtually Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and filed declaration and undertaking in Form-1 and Form