Search: disallowance

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 206Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 358 Section 14A3 Disallowance3 Section 115J2 Section 143(2)2 Section 35(1)(ii)2 Section 142 Business Income2 Deduction2

ESSEL PROPACK LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE-6(3)(2), MUMBAI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2068/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 May 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Pawan Singhessel Propack Limited, Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Top Floor, Times Tower, Income Tax Range-6(3)(2), Room No. 563, 5Th Floor, Kamala City, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Aayakar Bhawan, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400013 Mumbai-400020. Pan : Aaace 1568L Appellant Respondednt

Section 14Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36Section 36(1)(iii)

section (r.w.s.) 144C (13) of Income tax Act (Act), passed in pursuance of direction of dispute resolution penal (DRP-2) dated 15.12.2015 for assessment year 2011-12. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal “1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment - Guarantee Fees a) The Ld. DRP/TPO/AO erred in law and facts in making addition

ESSEL PROPACK LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE-6(3)(2), MUMBAI

ESSEL PROPACK LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE-6(3)(2), MUMBAI

ARROW GRENTECH LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 9 (1)92), MUMBAI

ARROW GRENTECH LTD. ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 9 (1)92) , MUMBAI