BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 200Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Indore108Raipur15Delhi12Chennai10Mumbai7Jaipur6Hyderabad5Bangalore4Kolkata4Lucknow2Jodhpur2Karnataka1Pune1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 312Section 2637Section 46Deduction5TDS5Disallowance5Section 200A4Section 1543Section 234E3Section 260A

CROMPTON GREAVES LTD,MUMBAI vs. CIT -6, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee company in ITA no

ITA 2836/MUM/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Feb 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav & Shri Ramit Kochar"ी शैल" कुमार यादव, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी "ी रिमत कोचर, लेखाकार सद"य के सम" । आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1994/Mum/2013 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 2836/Mum/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08) M/S Crompton Greaves बनाम/ Cit – 6,Mumbai, Ltd.,6Th Floor, C.G. House, 5Th Floor, V. Dr. A.B. Road, Worli, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai – 400 030. M.K. Road, Mumbai – 400 020. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan : Aaacc3840K .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Assessee By Shri Pradeep N. Kapasi Revenue By : Shri C.W. Angolkar सुनवाई क" तार"ख /Date Of Hearing : 29-10-2015 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 01-02-2016

For Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar
Section 143(3)Section 263

disallowing the claim for deduction for expenditures in respect of excise duty of Rs. 43,00,000 without application of mind by carrying out the directions of the CIT vide his order dt. 06.02.2013 passed u/s. 263 of the Act. b. Your appellant submits that during the year the company has accounted for excise duty amounting

3
Section 2603
Rectification u/s 1543

DADIBA KALI PUNDOLE ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMEM TAX -17(1), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3265/MUM/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Jul 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Shri Amey Wagle & Shri AzimFor Respondent: 07.07.2025
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 194QSection 234Section 234CSection 246ASection 250

disallowance 7. Having accepted the fact that the Appellant was an auctioneer, and that he was entitled to further TDS credit of Rs. 2,19,46,625/-, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ought to have allowed the said TDS credit. 8. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in denying TDS credit to the tune

K. JAYANTILAL SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD) CIRCLE-4(3), MUMBAI

In the result, this appeal by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4715/MUM/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Feb 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahyaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 4715/Mum/2017 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) K Jayantilal Securities Pvt. Ltd. Jt. Cit (Osd), बनाम/ 2Nd Floor, Ps 4, Circle 4(3), Room No. 649, Rotunda Building Dalal Street, Aaykar Bhavan, Mumbai Vs. Mumbai – 400 001 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aaack 4621 Q (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Sanjay C. Shah ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. N. Hemalatha सुनवाई क" तार"ख / : 16.11.2017 Date Of Hearing घोषणा क" तार"ख / : 05.02.2018 Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Shamim Yahya, A. M.: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Dated 05.05.2017 & Pertains To The Assessment Year 2005- 06. 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Read As Under: Learned Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Erred In Confirming The Order Of Learned Assessing Officer In Levying Income Tax @ 30% On Short Term Capital Gains On Sale Of Shares Of Rs.3,47,979/- As Against 10% U/S. 111A Of The Act As Claimed By The Appellant.

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay C. ShahFor Respondent: Ms. N. Hemalatha
Section 111ASection 116Section 143Section 154Section 155Section 156Section 186Section 200ASection 206C

200A; (d) amend any intimation under sub-section (1) of section 206CB. (1A) Where any matter has been considered and decided in any proceeding by way of appeal or revision relating to an order referred to in sub-section (1), the authority passing such order may, notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, amend

TRANSTONNELSTROY AFCONS JOINT VENTURE,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CIR 20(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 1452/MUM/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 May 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya (Am) & Shri Amarjit Singh (Jm)

Section 234BSection 234CSection 234DSection 37(1)

disallowing expenses of Rs. l,33,63,443/-and audit fees of Rs. 33,090/-/The present appeal is filed against this assessment order. 3. The assessee carried the matter to learned CIT(A) and pursuant to learned CIT(A)’s order on the above issues, assessee has filed the appeal before us and raised the ground as deleted above

M/S. PRIVELEGE REALTORS PVT. LTD.,,MUMBAI vs. ACIT(TDS), CPC,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed as observed above

ITA 1522/MUM/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Feb 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri N.K. Pradhan, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Ms. Bhumika JoshiFor Respondent: Ms. Shreekala Pardeshhi
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 260Section 260ASection 3Section 4Section 54F

200A of the Act. (A.Y: 2016-17) M/s. Privelege Realtors Pvt. Ltd., 2. At the time of hearing the appeals virtually Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and filed declaration and undertaking in Form-1 and Form-2 to settle the litigation and Form 3 is awaited from the Revenue. In view

M/S. PRIVELEGE REALTORS PVT. LTD.,,MUMBAI vs. ACIT(TDS) CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed as observed above

ITA 1520/MUM/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Feb 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri N.K. Pradhan, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Ms. Bhumika JoshiFor Respondent: Ms. Shreekala Pardeshhi
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 260Section 260ASection 3Section 4Section 54F

200A of the Act. (A.Y: 2016-17) M/s. Privelege Realtors Pvt. Ltd., 2. At the time of hearing the appeals virtually Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and filed declaration and undertaking in Form-1 and Form-2 to settle the litigation and Form 3 is awaited from the Revenue. In view

M/S. PRIVELEGE REALTORS PVT. LTD.,,MUMBAI vs. ACIT(TDS) CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed as observed above

ITA 1521/MUM/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Feb 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri N.K. Pradhan, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Ms. Bhumika JoshiFor Respondent: Ms. Shreekala Pardeshhi
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 260Section 260ASection 3Section 4Section 54F

200A of the Act. (A.Y: 2016-17) M/s. Privelege Realtors Pvt. Ltd., 2. At the time of hearing the appeals virtually Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and filed declaration and undertaking in Form-1 and Form-2 to settle the litigation and Form 3 is awaited from the Revenue. In view