BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

912 results for “disallowance”+ Section 133Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai912Delhi652Bangalore298Kolkata221Chennai208Jaipur206Hyderabad129Ahmedabad95Rajkot85Pune76Indore53Chandigarh53Visakhapatnam49Guwahati36Surat36Nagpur28Amritsar26Raipur24Lucknow23Ranchi20Jodhpur16Agra16Panaji12Patna8Cuttack8Allahabad6Cochin6Varanasi6Kerala5SC5Karnataka4Calcutta2Dehradun2Jabalpur1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 153C101Section 143(3)86Section 14783Addition to Income80Section 14875Section 133A67Section 6864Survey u/s 133A59Disallowance44Reopening of Assessment

DCIT CIR 1(4) , MUMBAI vs. ANANDILAL & GANESH PODAR SOCIETY, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1792/MUM/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Mar 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

Section 147

section 133A was also carried out on associated entities/individuals on the same date and subsequent dates. Later this assessment was reopened u/s 147 of the Act vide issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Act dated 26.03.2018. The return in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act was filed by the assessee on 22.11.2018 declaring total income

DCIT CIR 1(4) , MUMBAI vs. ANANDILAL & GANESH PODAR SOCIETY, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1791/MUM/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

Showing 1–20 of 912 · Page 1 of 46

...
40
Section 153A25
Reassessment23
Section 147

section 133A was also carried out on associated entities/individuals on the same date and subsequent dates. Later this assessment was reopened u/s 147 of the Act vide issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Act dated 26.03.2018. The return in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act was filed by the assessee on 22.11.2018 declaring total income

DCIT CIR 1(4) , MUMBAI vs. ANANDILAL & GANESH PODAR SOCIETY, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1790/MUM/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

Section 147

section 133A was also carried out on associated entities/individuals on the same date and subsequent dates. Later this assessment was reopened u/s 147 of the Act vide issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Act dated 26.03.2018. The return in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act was filed by the assessee on 22.11.2018 declaring total income

SHRI RENUKAMATA MULTI-STATE CO-OPERATIVE URBAN SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(4), MUMBAI

ITA 1727/MUM/2023[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jul 2024AY 2018-2019
For Appellant: Shri Dharmendra KansaraFor Respondent: Ms. Mahita Nair
Section 142Section 153DSection 250Section 68

133A of the Act\nwere also carried out at the branch offices of the assessee at Ahmedabad,\nChennai, and Hyderabad. In response to the notice issued under section 153A\nof the Act, the assessee filed its return of income on 02/10/2018 declaring a\nloss of Rs.2,62,66,952. Thereafter, notice under section 143(2) as well as\nnotice under

M/S RENUKAMATA MULTI STATE CO-OP. URBAN CREDITN SOC. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. THE ASSTT. CIT, CC-4(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed, while the\nappeal by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1726/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jul 2024AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Dharmendra KansaraFor Respondent: Ms. Mahita Nair
Section 142Section 153DSection 250Section 68

133A of the Act\nwere also carried out at the branch offices of the assessee at Ahmedabad,\nChennai, and Hyderabad. In response to the notice issued under section 153A\nof the Act, the assessee filed its return of income on 02/10/2018 declaring a\nloss of Rs.2,62,66,952. Thereafter, notice under section 143(2) as well as\nnotice under

JCIT (OSD), CC-4(4), MUMBAI vs. M/S. SHRI RENUKAMATA MULTI-STATE COOPERATIVE URBAN CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., AHAMEDNAGAR

ITA 2078/MUM/2023[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jul 2024AY 2018-2019
For Appellant: Shri Dharmendra KansaraFor Respondent: Ms. Mahita Nair
Section 142Section 153DSection 250Section 68

133A of the Act\nwere also carried out at the branch offices of the assessee at Ahmedabad,\nChennai, and Hyderabad. In response to the notice issued under section 153A\nof the Act, the assessee filed its return of income on 02/10/2018 declaring a\nloss of Rs.2,62,66,952. Thereafter, notice under section 143(2) as well as\nnotice under

M.R. CONSTRUCTION,.,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 3711/MUM/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7208/MUM/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7210/MUM/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

ASST CIT CC-22, MUMBAI vs. JAWAHAR PUROHIT, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 6848/MUM/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7211/MUM/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

M.R. CONSTRUCTION,.,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 3710/MUM/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

ASST CIT CC-22, MUMBAI vs. JAWAHAR PUROHIT, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 6847/MUM/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

DCIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI vs. M.R. CONSTRUCTION, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 3646/MUM/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7209/MUM/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7212/MUM/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

DCIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI vs. M.R. CONSTRUCTION, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 3645/MUM/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

ACIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI vs. M.R. CONSTRUCTION, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 1144/MUM/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

M.R. CONSTRUCTION,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CEN CIR 22,

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 3709/MUM/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7213/MUM/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges