MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-7(2)(1), MUMBAI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed partly for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed partly for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed partly for stati...
ITA 2751/MUM/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Feb 2023AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail () Assessment Year: 2012-13 Mead Johnson Nutrition (India) Acit, Circle-7(2)(1), Pvt. Ltd., Aayakar Bhavan, Room Unit No. 54, 5Th Floor, Kalpataru Vs. No. 573, 5Th Floor, M.K. Square, Andheri Kurla Road, Road, Andheri (East), Mumbai-400020. Mumbai-400059. Pan No. Aafcm 8167 J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Bhaumik Goda Revenue By : Smt. Mahita Nair, Cit-Dr : Date Of Hearing 11/01/2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 13/02/2023
For Appellant: Shri Bhaumik GodaFor Respondent: Smt. Mahita Nair, CIT-DR
Section 250
natural justice, contrary to well principles principles principles of of of law, law, law, based based based on on on unsubstantiated unsubstantiated unsubstantiated presumptions presumptions presumptions and and and erroneous erroneous erroneous interpretation interpretation interpretation of of of provisions of law. Thus, the Impugned Order is provisions of law. Thus, the Impugned Order is provisions of law. Thus, the Impugned
