BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

56 results for “depreciation”+ Section 153Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai56Amritsar45Delhi45Bangalore31Chandigarh21Lucknow7Cuttack6Jaipur5Dehradun4Cochin4Pune3Hyderabad3Kolkata3Ahmedabad3Nagpur1Chennai1

Key Topics

Addition to Income31Section 153C25Section 13223Section 153A23Section 69A20Section 80I20Section 25019Depreciation18Section 26317Section 68

HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI

ITA 1300/MUM/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

SVP SOUTH WEST INDUSTRIES LTD. (FORMERLY, PLATINUM TEXTILE LTD.),MUMBAI-400005 vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8(2), MUMBAI

ITA 1275/MUM/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

Showing 1–20 of 56 · Page 1 of 3

17
Charitable Trust14
Exemption14

SVP SOUTH WEST INDUSTRIES LTD. (FORMERLY, PLATINUM TEXTILE LTD.),MUMBAI-400005 vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8(2), MUMBAI

ITA 1274/MUM/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

SVP SOUTH WEST INDUSTRIES LTD. (FORMERLY, PLATINUM TEXTILE LTD.),MUMBAI-400005 vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8(2), MUMBAI

ITA 1273/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

ACIT (CC)-8(2) , MUMBAI vs. HELIOS EXPORTS LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 1735/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

CITRON INFRAPROJECT LTD.,,MUMBAI-400005 vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI-20

ITA 1267/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

CITRON INFRAPROJECT LTD.,,MUMBAI-400005 vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI-400020

ITA 1268/MUM/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

SVP SOUTH WEST INDUSTRIES LTD. (FORMERLY, PLATINUM TEXTILE LTD.),MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC- 8(2), MUMBAI

ITA 1271/MUM/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI vs. HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED, MUMBAI

ITA 1740/MUM/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

ACIT (CC)-8(2) , MUMBAI vs. HELIOS EXPORTS LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 1734/MUM/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

SVP GLOBAL TEXTILES LTD FORMERLY SVP GLOBAL VENTURES LTD,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

ITA 1310/MUM/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

SVP GLOBAL TEXTILES LTD FORMERLY SVP GLOBAL VENTURES LTD,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI MUMBAI MUMB, MUMBAI

ITA 1311/MUM/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

SVP GLOBAL TEXTILES LTD FORMERLY SVP GLOBAL VENTURES LTD MUMBAI ,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI , MUMBAI

ITA 1313/MUM/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

HELLIOS EXPORTS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI

ITA 1334/MUM/2022[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

SHRIVALLABH PITTIE INDUSTRIES LTD ,MUMBAI. vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI

ITA 1337/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2)., MUMBAI vs. M/S CITRON INFRAPROJECTS LTD , MUMBAI

ITA 1569/MUM/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S CITRON INFRAPROJECTS LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 1571/MUM/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S CITRON INFRAPROJECTS LTD , MUMBAI

ITA 1572/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

SVP SOUTH WEST INDUSTRIES LTD. (FORMERLY, PLATINUM TEXTILE LTD.),MUMBAI-400005 vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8(2), MUMBAI

ITA 1272/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that

HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI

ITA 1301/MUM/2022[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

153D of the act. Thus, this ground was dismissed. The assessee also contested that the assessment order has been passed without issuance of notice under section 143 (2) of the act within the prescribed time limit. The learned CIT – A after considering the explanation of the assessee decided this issue as per paragraph number 6 of the order holding that