BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,345 results for “depreciation”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,427Mumbai1,345Ahmedabad461Bangalore308Chennai267Kolkata212Jaipur173Pune168Chandigarh141Hyderabad113Raipur65Surat61Indore59Cochin35Visakhapatnam34Lucknow31Guwahati28SC26Cuttack26Amritsar24Rajkot23Karnataka22Nagpur21Jodhpur16Dehradun13Telangana10Agra9Patna9Panaji6Kerala6Ranchi5Calcutta4Jabalpur4Allahabad3Varanasi1Rajasthan1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)88Section 143(3)69Addition to Income57Disallowance56Depreciation40Penalty36Section 115J29Section 80I26Deduction24Section 153A

ACIT-3(4), MUMBAI vs. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed whereas the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2898/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2016-17 Reliance Industries Ltd., Dy. Cit Circle 3(4), 3Rd Floor, Maker Chamber Iv 222 Room No. 559, Aayakar Bhavan, Nariman Point, Vs. Maharshi Karve Road, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400020. Pan No. Aaacr 5055 K Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2016-17 Acit-3(4), Reliance Industries Ltd., Room No. 481(2), 4Th Floor, 3Rd Floor, Maker Chamber Iv Aayakar Bhavan, N.M. Road, Vs. Nariman Point, New Marine Lines, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400020. Pan No. Aaacr 5055 K Appellant Respondent

For Respondent: Mr. Madhur Agrawal
Section 14ASection 271(1)(c)Section 32A

Penalty levied on disallowance of depreciation on KGD6 Block of Rs. 231,99,95,977/- ignoring the facts that the penalty

Showing 1–20 of 1,345 · Page 1 of 68

...
22
Section 14A21
Section 14718

RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CIRCLE 3(4) , MUMBAI

ITA 2767/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

For Appellant: Mr. Madhur AgrawalFor Respondent: Ms. Sanyogita Nagpal, CIT-DR
Section 14ASection 271(1)(c)Section 32A

Penalty levied on disallowance of depreciation on KGD6 Block of Rs. 231,99,95,977/- ignoring the facts that the penalty

ASST CIT CIR 4(2), MUMBAI vs. HINDUSTAN ORGANIC CHEMICALS LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee for AY 2003-04 and 2004-05 are partly allowed

ITA 6946/MUM/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 May 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Ramlal Negi (Jm)

Section 142Section 271(1)(c)

penalty levied on the disallowance of depreciation on stores and spares- Rs.47.46 lakhs. The Ld CIT(A) has confirmed the penalty

HINDUSTAN ORGANIC CHEMICAL LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CIR 4(2), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee for AY 2003-04 and 2004-05 are partly allowed

ITA 7048/MUM/2013[1999-00]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 May 2016AY 1999-00

Bench: S/Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Ramlal Negi (Jm)

Section 142Section 271(1)(c)

penalty levied on the disallowance of depreciation on stores and spares- Rs.47.46 lakhs. The Ld CIT(A) has confirmed the penalty

ASST CIT CIR 4(2), MUMBAI vs. HINDUSTAN ORGANIC CHEMICALS LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee for AY 2003-04 and 2004-05 are partly allowed

ITA 6944/MUM/2013[1999-00]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 May 2016AY 1999-00

Bench: S/Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Ramlal Negi (Jm)

Section 142Section 271(1)(c)

penalty levied on the disallowance of depreciation on stores and spares- Rs.47.46 lakhs. The Ld CIT(A) has confirmed the penalty

HINDUSTAN ORGANIC CHEMICAL LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CIR 4(2), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee for AY 2003-04 and 2004-05 are partly allowed

ITA 7049/MUM/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 May 2016AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Ramlal Negi (Jm)

Section 142Section 271(1)(c)

penalty levied on the disallowance of depreciation on stores and spares- Rs.47.46 lakhs. The Ld CIT(A) has confirmed the penalty

ASST CIT CIR 4(2), MUMBAI vs. HINDUSTAN ORGANIC CHEMICALS LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee for AY 2003-04 and 2004-05 are partly allowed

ITA 6945/MUM/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 May 2016AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Ramlal Negi (Jm)

Section 142Section 271(1)(c)

penalty levied on the disallowance of depreciation on stores and spares- Rs.47.46 lakhs. The Ld CIT(A) has confirmed the penalty

PRECISION CONTANEURS LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS VASPARR FISCHE LTD ),MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CIR 9(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for assessment years 1996-97

ITA 3449/MUM/2011[1997-98]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jan 2017AY 1997-98

Bench: Shri Jason P. Boaz & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri M. SubramanianFor Respondent: Shri Ranathir Gupta
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 43B

penalty on depreciation, considering that penalty covered by clause (a) of Explanation 4 of section 271(1)(c) instead of clause

PRECISION CONTANEURS LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS VASPARR FISCHE LTD ),MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CIR 9(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for assessment years 1996-97

ITA 3448/MUM/2011[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jan 2017AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri Jason P. Boaz & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri M. SubramanianFor Respondent: Shri Ranathir Gupta
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 43B

penalty on depreciation, considering that penalty covered by clause (a) of Explanation 4 of section 271(1)(c) instead of clause

ACIT. CIR.-9(3), MUMBAI vs. M/S VASPARR FISCHER LTD. (NOW M/S. PRESIDENT CONTAINERS LTD.), MUMBAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for assessment years 1996-97

ITA 3445/MUM/2011[1997-98]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jan 2017AY 1997-98

Bench: Shri Jason P. Boaz & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri M. SubramanianFor Respondent: Shri Ranathir Gupta
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 43B

penalty on depreciation, considering that penalty covered by clause (a) of Explanation 4 of section 271(1)(c) instead of clause

THE DCIT CIR 3(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S. ICICI BANK LTD. ( ERSTWHILE ANAGRAM FINANCE LTD), MUMBAI

Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed, as above

ITA 5821/MUM/2007[1995-1996]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Aug 2018AY 1995-1996

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Sandeep Gosain: A.Y : 1995-96

For Appellant: Ms. Jacinta Zimik VashaiFor Respondent: Ms. Aarti Vissanji
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty levied on disallowance of depreciation on assets leased to Tata Telecom Ltd. is concerned, the amount of penalty is Rs.95

DCIT - (LTU) - 1 , MUMBAI vs. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and Cross Objections filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 6267/MUM/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Mar 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Yadav &For Respondent: Shri H.N. Singh (CIT-DR)
Section 271(1)(c)Section 92C

penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act on account of disallowance of depreciation on steel purchase even though

CANA GLASS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO WD 9(1)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3397/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Shri G. Manjunatha, Am Cana Glass Ltd. Vs. Ito Ward 9(1)(2) Predpl, 52, Natasha House Aayakar Bhavan, Hill Road, Mumbai-400 050 Mumbai – 400 020 Pan/Gir No.Aaacc5587D Appellant) .. Respondent)

Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty imposed in relation to the denial of claim of depreciation also.” 7. Since, the coordinate Bench has deleted the penalty

ITO 5(1)(3), MUMBAI vs. DHADDA DIAMONDS P.LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, Department’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 6555/MUM/2014[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jun 2016AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh Thar a/wFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwal
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

depreciation, the Assessing Officer initiated proceedings for imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) by issuing notice under section

CANA GLASS LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 9(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2009-

ITA 3396/MUM/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya (Am) & Shri Ram Lal Negi (Jm) Assessment Year: 2009-10 M/S Cana Glass Ltd., The Dy. Commissioner Of Predpl, 52, Natasha House, Income Tax, Circle 9 (1), Hill Road, Aaykar Bhavan, Mumbai – 400050 Vs. Mumbai - 400020 Pan: Aaacc5587D

For Appellant: Shri Hari Raheja (AR)For Respondent: Shri Ram Tiwari (Sr. DR)
Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

penalty of claim of depreciation. But the Tribunal deleted the same. Hence, in the present case the penalty confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) is liable

SUNIL T. DOSHI,MUMBAI vs. JCIT RG 24(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 456/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Feb 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey () & Shri G Manjunatha ()

Section 22Section 23Section 23(1)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in 11 ITA 456 & 457/Mum/2016 respect of disallowance of depreciation on computers. Aggrieved by the penalty

THE HINDUSTAN CO-OP. BANK LTD.,MUMBAI vs. JT. CIT 13(3), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1475/MUM/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Apr 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Ravish Soodm/S The Hindustan Co-Op Commmissioner Of Income Bank Limited, 4-A, Devi Galli, Tax-28, Baburao Bodbe Marg, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Lokhand Bazaar, Maharshi Karve Road, Mumbai – 400 009 Mumbai – 400 020. Pan – Aabat4355R (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Sawana &For Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar Singh, D.R
Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

depreciation my predecessor has confirmed the penalty. Hence penalty on both counts of depreciation is confirmed.” As is discernible from

DCIT 8(1), MUMBAI vs. CASTROL INDIA LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 7922/MUM/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jul 2016AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri Peejush Sonkar, Sr. Counsel a/wFor Respondent: Shri N.K. Chand
Section 271(1)(c)

penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act") on the addition made on account of disallowance of depreciation

DCIT CEN CIR 8(2), MUMBAI vs. DORF KETAL CHEMICALS (I) P.LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4682/MUM/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Oct 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood () & Shri N.K. Pradhan () Assessment Year: 2004-05 & Assessment Year: 2005-06

For Appellant: Mr. Nilesh Patel, ARFor Respondent: Mr.Rajesh Ojha, &
Section 132(1)Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 251Section 271(1)(c)

penalty levied on account of confirmation of quantum addition regarding disallowance of additional depreciation claimed in the return u/s 153A

DCIT 2(1), MUMBAI vs. GODAVARI SUGAR MILLS LTD, MUMBAI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1800/MUM/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Sept 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Am & Shri Ravish Sood, Jm आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 1800/Mum/2013 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2004-05)

For Appellant: Shri Vipul Joshi, A.RFor Respondent: Mrs. Vidisha Katra, D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

depreciation. The assessee in the course of the penalty proceedings tried to impress upon the A.O that the raising of depreciation