DCIT - CC 3 (1), MUMBAI vs. WIND WORLD INDIA LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

bogus purchases on estimated basis. 072. We first deal with the appeal of the learned assessing officer. Ground number 2 – 4 of the appeal is with respect to the disallowance deleted by the learned CIT – A u/s 14 A of the act amounting to ₹ 541,007,860/– as the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the year

WIND WORLD INDIA LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3 (1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

bogus purchases on estimated basis. 072. We first deal with the appeal of the learned assessing officer. Ground number 2 – 4 of the appeal is with respect to the disallowance deleted by the learned CIT – A u/s 14 A of the act amounting to ₹ 541,007,860/– as the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the year

WIND WORLD INDIA LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3 (1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

bogus purchases on estimated basis. 072. We first deal with the appeal of the learned assessing officer. Ground number 2 – 4 of the appeal is with respect to the disallowance deleted by the learned CIT – A u/s 14 A of the act amounting to ₹ 541,007,860/– as the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the year

WIND WORLD INDIA LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

bogus purchases on estimated basis. 072. We first deal with the appeal of the learned assessing officer. Ground number 2 – 4 of the appeal is with respect to the disallowance deleted by the learned CIT – A u/s 14 A of the act amounting to ₹ 541,007,860/– as the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the year

WIND WORLD INDIA LIMITEAD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

bogus purchases on estimated basis. 072. We first deal with the appeal of the learned assessing officer. Ground number 2 – 4 of the appeal is with respect to the disallowance deleted by the learned CIT – A u/s 14 A of the act amounting to ₹ 541,007,860/– as the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the year

WIND WORLD INDIA LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

bogus purchases on estimated basis. 072. We first deal with the appeal of the learned assessing officer. Ground number 2 – 4 of the appeal is with respect to the disallowance deleted by the learned CIT – A u/s 14 A of the act amounting to ₹ 541,007,860/– as the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the year

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3 (1), MUMBAI vs. WIND WORLD INDIA LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

bogus purchases on estimated basis. 072. We first deal with the appeal of the learned assessing officer. Ground number 2 – 4 of the appeal is with respect to the disallowance deleted by the learned CIT – A u/s 14 A of the act amounting to ₹ 541,007,860/– as the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the year

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), MUMBAI vs. WIND WORLD INDIA LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

bogus purchases on estimated basis. 072. We first deal with the appeal of the learned assessing officer. Ground number 2 – 4 of the appeal is with respect to the disallowance deleted by the learned CIT – A u/s 14 A of the act amounting to ₹ 541,007,860/– as the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the year

DCIT - CC 3(1), MUMBAI vs. WIND WORLD INDIA LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

bogus purchases on estimated basis. 072. We first deal with the appeal of the learned assessing officer. Ground number 2 – 4 of the appeal is with respect to the disallowance deleted by the learned CIT – A u/s 14 A of the act amounting to ₹ 541,007,860/– as the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the year

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), MUMBAI vs. WIND WORLD INDIA LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

bogus purchases on estimated basis. 072. We first deal with the appeal of the learned assessing officer. Ground number 2 – 4 of the appeal is with respect to the disallowance deleted by the learned CIT – A u/s 14 A of the act amounting to ₹ 541,007,860/– as the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the year

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(4) MUMBAI , PRATISHTHA BHAVAN MUMBAI vs. ASHTECH INDIA PVT LTD (E-FILING), ASHTECH HOUSE

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

purchase from which are considered as bogus in the assessment order. All these par order. All these parties submitted their reply along with supporting ties submitted their reply along with supporting documents. These were also verified by the AO and found in order. documents. These were also verified by the AO and found in order. documents. These were also verified

M/S ASHTECH (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI CITY vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

purchase from which are considered as bogus in the assessment order. All these par order. All these parties submitted their reply along with supporting ties submitted their reply along with supporting documents. These were also verified by the AO and found in order. documents. These were also verified by the AO and found in order. documents. These were also verified

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(4) MUMBAI, PRATISHTHA BHAVAN MUMBAI vs. ASHTECH INDIA PVT LTD (E-FILING), ASHTECH HOUSE MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

purchase from which are considered as bogus in the assessment order. All these par order. All these parties submitted their reply along with supporting ties submitted their reply along with supporting documents. These were also verified by the AO and found in order. documents. These were also verified by the AO and found in order. documents. These were also verified

M/S ASHTECH (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

purchase from which are considered as bogus in the assessment order. All these par order. All these parties submitted their reply along with supporting ties submitted their reply along with supporting documents. These were also verified by the AO and found in order. documents. These were also verified by the AO and found in order. documents. These were also verified

M/S ASHTECH (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI CITY vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4) , MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

purchase from which are considered as bogus in the assessment order. All these par order. All these parties submitted their reply along with supporting ties submitted their reply along with supporting documents. These were also verified by the AO and found in order. documents. These were also verified by the AO and found in order. documents. These were also verified

M/S ASHTECH (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI CITY vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

purchase from which are considered as bogus in the assessment order. All these par order. All these parties submitted their reply along with supporting ties submitted their reply along with supporting documents. These were also verified by the AO and found in order. documents. These were also verified by the AO and found in order. documents. These were also verified

M/S ASHTECH (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI CITY vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

purchase from which are considered as bogus in the assessment order. All these par order. All these parties submitted their reply along with supporting ties submitted their reply along with supporting documents. These were also verified by the AO and found in order. documents. These were also verified by the AO and found in order. documents. These were also verified

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 (4) MUMBAI, PRATISHTHA BHAVAN MUMBAI vs. ASHTECH INDIA PVT LTD (E-FILING), ASHTECH HOUSE MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

purchase from which are considered as bogus in the assessment order. All these par order. All these parties submitted their reply along with supporting ties submitted their reply along with supporting documents. These were also verified by the AO and found in order. documents. These were also verified by the AO and found in order. documents. These were also verified

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S.SHORELINE HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue as well as the Cross

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar (Am) & Shri Ram Lal Negi (Jm) Assessment Year: 2008-09 The Dy. Commissioner Of Income M/S Shoreline Hotels Pvt. Ltd., Tax, Central Circle- 1(2), Prop. M/S Marine Plaza, Dur-Ul- R. No. 906, 9Th Floor, Old Cgo Habib, 29, Marine Drive, Bldg., Annex Bldg., M.K. Road, Vs. Churchgate, Mumbai - 400020 Mumbai - 400020 Pan: Aabcs1380B

bogus purchases claimed as revenue expenses and depreciation amounting Rs. 1,31,417/- in relation to the capitalized amount is upheld