SHREECHAND BUILDERS P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 9(3)(1), MUMBAI

Bench: Hon‟Ble Sh.R. C. Sharma, Am& Hon‟Ble Sandeep Gosain, Jm

801B(10) at Rs.51,40,622/-. It is further seen that you have computed book profit u/s.115JB at Rs. NIL, therefore, no tax liability thereon has not been determined. It is further seen that in the assessment order u/s 143(3) dated 27.12.10 deduction claimed u/s 80IB(10) has been disallowed however, no discussion has taken place in respect

RIGHT TIGHT FASTNERS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT-11 (1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, this appeal by the assessee stands dismissed

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm Right Tight Fastners Pvt. Ltd. Acit-11(1)(1) 18-A/31, Manish Kaveri, Four Aayakar R. Bhavan, M. K. Road, Bunglows, Andheri (W), Vs. Mumbai-400 020 Mumbai-400 053

801B 307 the return of income by the due date by the assessees who are entitled for deductions under Section 80-1A or Section 80-IAB or Section 80- IB or Section 80- IC from their income, a new Section 80AC has been inserted so ax to provide that no deduction under Section 8Q-IA or Section

RUSHABH APARTMENT CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD-19(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Smt. Renu Jauhrirushabh Apartment Co-Op. V/S. Ito. Ward 19(3)(1), Housing Society Limited बनाम Mumbai Dr. Parekh Street, Matru Mandir, Mumbai Prarthana Samaj, Mumbai Maharashtra-400007 Maharashtra-400004 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aaaar5230L Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

10 years in filing of the appeal. Accordingly, the request for condonation of delay was rejected and the appeal of the assessee was dismissed in limine. Aggrieved with the order of Ld. CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before us. 5. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the facts of the case. At the outset

TAJ EXIM INTERNATIONAL LTD,MUMBAI vs. JTCIT (OSD) 3(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

delay in filing the present appeal is condoned and we proceed to decide the appeal on merits. 4. In this appeal, the assessee has raised the following grounds:– “1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon. CIT(Appeals) erred in confirming the fact in making an addition by disallowing under section 801B of M/s. Taj Exim International Limited