SILVERLINE COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-31(2)(1)

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

10 years. Vide order dated 11.03.2024, Addl. CIT (A) has dismissed the appeal on the ground of inordinate delay of 3860 days. It has been stated in the order that the assessee also did not file proof of filing of application for rectification u/s 154 of the Act, hence, the delay was not condoned.\n5. Before

RUSHABH APARTMENT CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD-19(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Smt. Renu Jauhrirushabh Apartment Co-Op. V/S. Ito. Ward 19(3)(1), Housing Society Limited बनाम Mumbai Dr. Parekh Street, Matru Mandir, Mumbai Prarthana Samaj, Mumbai Maharashtra-400007 Maharashtra-400004 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aaaar5230L Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

10 years in filing of the appeal. Accordingly, the request for condonation of delay was rejected and the appeal of the assessee was dismissed in limine. Aggrieved with the order of Ld. CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before us. 5. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the facts of the case. At the outset

TAJ EXIM INTERNATIONAL LTD,MUMBAI vs. JTCIT (OSD) 3(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

delay in filing the present appeal is condoned and we proceed to decide the appeal on merits. 4. In this appeal, the assessee has raised the following grounds:– “1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon. CIT(Appeals) erred in confirming the fact in making an addition by disallowing under section 801B of M/s. Taj Exim International Limited

SILVERLINE COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD-31(2)(1)

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

10 years. Vide order dated\n11.03.2024, Addl. CIT (A) has dismissed the appeal on the ground of inordinate\ndelay of 3860 days. It has been stated in the order that the assessee also did not\nfile proof of filing of application for rectification u/s 154 of the Act, hence, the\ndelay was not condoned.\n5. Before

SILVERLINE COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD-31(2)(1)

10 years. Vide order dated\n11.03.2024, Addl. CIT (A) has dismissed the appeal on the ground of inordinate\ndelay of 3860 days. It has been stated in the order that the assessee also did not\nfile proof of filing of application for rectification u/s 154 of the Act, hence, the\ndelay was not condoned.\n5. Before

SILVERLINE COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD-31(2)(1)

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

10 years. Vide order dated\n11.03.2024, Addl. CIT (A) has dismissed the appeal on the ground of inordinate\ndelay of 3860 days. It has been stated in the order that the assessee also did not\nfile proof of filing of application for rectification u/s 154 of the Act, hence, the\ndelay was not condoned.\n5. Before

SILVERLINE COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD-31(2)(1)

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

10 years. Vide order dated\n11.03.2024, Addl. CIT (A) has dismissed the appeal on the ground of inordinate\ndelay of 3860 days. It has been stated in the order that the assessee also did not\nfile proof of filing of application for rectification u/s 154 of the Act, hence, the\ndelay was not condoned.\n5.\nBefore