BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 292Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai76Kolkata44Delhi41Bangalore20Hyderabad15Jaipur14Rajkot13Ahmedabad10Chandigarh8Mumbai7Nagpur6Dehradun4Jodhpur3Lucknow3Pune3Surat2Visakhapatnam2Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4Addition to Income4Section 69B2Section 292C2Section 1322Section 69A2Condonation of Delay2

ADARSH HEGDE,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CEN CIR 44, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assesse is allowed

ITA 1839/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Aug 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri Ram Lal Negiadarsh Hegde Vs. Dcit,Central Circle-8(1) 5Th Floor Room No.656, 6Th Floor Diamond Square Aaykar Bhawan Cst Road, Kalina M.K.Road Santacruz (East) Mumbai-400 020 Mumbai-400 098 Pan/Gir No.Aabph5562P Appellant) .. Respondent)

Section 271A

delay in filing of appeal is condoned and appeal filed by the assessee is admitted for hearing. 6. The brief facts of the case are that a search and seizure action u/s 132 of the I.T.Act, 1961 was carried out on 10/07/2009, in the case of Allcargo Group of Companies and the directors, accordingly search was carried

VIVEK MEHROTRA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 3(2) , MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2359/MUM/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jan 2023
AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Bleshri Vivek Mehrotra V. Dcit – Central Circle – 3(2) Office No. 116, Churchgate Chamber Room No. 1913, 19Th Floor Above Greater Bank, 5 New Marine Lines Air India Building, Nariman Point Mumbai -400020 Mumbai – 400 021 Pan: Aahpm4127B (Appellant) (Respondent) Dcit – Central Circle – 3(2) V. Shri Vivek Mehrotra Central Range - 3 Office No. 116, Churchgate Chamber Above Greater Bank, 5 New Marine Lines Room No. 1913, 19Th Floor Mumbai -400020 Air India Building, Nariman Point Mumbai – 400 021 Pan: Aahpm4127B (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 132Section 153ASection 292CSection 69ASection 6A

292C of the Act, the presumption should be that the said cash belonged to him. According to the Assessing Officer, since the assessee had not provided a satisfactory explanation for the amount of ₹.75,00,000/-, it was added as his income under section 69A of the Act. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld.CIT(A) and Ld.CIT

RAJANIKANT C. SHAH,MUMBAI vs. ITO 10(2)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 800/MUM/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Jul 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh () & Shri Ashwani Taneja (Acountant Member)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 69B

delay is condoned and this appeal is admitted for adjudication. 3. The brief facts as culled out from the orders of the lower authorities are that the assessee had filed its return of income on 30-03-2006 declaring total income at Rs.3,83,650. During the year under consideration, the assessee was a director in M/s Sreeji Transport Service

M/S. KISHOR D NAIK (HUF),MUMBAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE -2, THANE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is accordingly allowed

ITA 5587/MUM/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Apr 2025AY 2012-13
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 292C

292C of the Income-Tax Act, 1961.\n2. At the threshold, the learned counsel for the assessee\nsubmitted that the present appeal has been instituted with a delay\nof seventy-six (76) days. In support thereof, reliance has been\nplaced upon the affidavit sworn by Shri Ritesh, the accountant of\nthe assessee. It has been submitted that the delay occasioned

SKYLARK BUILD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 4(2), MUMBAI

ITA 3237/MUM/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Rajesh Kumarassessment Year: 2007-08 M/S. Skylark Build Acit, Central Circle-4(2) 402, Sagar Avenue 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan बनाम/ Plot B-54, Junction Of M.K.Road, Vs. Lallubhai Park & S.V. Road Mumbai 400020 Andheri (W), Mumbai 400058 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pan. No. Aazfs0404K Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/S. Skylark Build Acit, Central Circle-4(2) 402, Sagar Avenue 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan बनाम/ Plot B-54, Junction Of M.K.Road, Vs. Lallubhai Park & S.V. Road Mumbai 400020 Andheri (W), Mumbai 400058 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pan. No. Aazfs0404K

section 153C of LT. Act, 1961 can be initiated in respect to person other than searched only if incriminating material belonging to such person has been found and seized from the premises of person searched. No incriminating documents found at the person searched being M/s. Artefact Projects Ltd. no valid proceedings under section 153C of IT Act, 1961 could have

DCIT CEN CIR 4(2), MUMBAI vs. SUDHAKAR M. SHETTY, MUMBAI

ITA 2906/MUM/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Rajesh Kumarassessment Year: 2007-08 M/S. Skylark Build Acit, Central Circle-4(2) 402, Sagar Avenue 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan बनाम/ Plot B-54, Junction Of M.K.Road, Vs. Lallubhai Park & S.V. Road Mumbai 400020 Andheri (W), Mumbai 400058 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pan. No. Aazfs0404K Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/S. Skylark Build Acit, Central Circle-4(2) 402, Sagar Avenue 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan बनाम/ Plot B-54, Junction Of M.K.Road, Vs. Lallubhai Park & S.V. Road Mumbai 400020 Andheri (W), Mumbai 400058 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pan. No. Aazfs0404K

section 153C of LT. Act, 1961 can be initiated in respect to person other than searched only if incriminating material belonging to such person has been found and seized from the premises of person searched. No incriminating documents found at the person searched being M/s. Artefact Projects Ltd. no valid proceedings under section 153C of IT Act, 1961 could have

SKYLARK BUILD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 4(2), MUMBAI

ITA 4370/MUM/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Rajesh Kumarassessment Year: 2007-08 M/S. Skylark Build Acit, Central Circle-4(2) 402, Sagar Avenue 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan बनाम/ Plot B-54, Junction Of M.K.Road, Vs. Lallubhai Park & S.V. Road Mumbai 400020 Andheri (W), Mumbai 400058 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pan. No. Aazfs0404K Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/S. Skylark Build Acit, Central Circle-4(2) 402, Sagar Avenue 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan बनाम/ Plot B-54, Junction Of M.K.Road, Vs. Lallubhai Park & S.V. Road Mumbai 400020 Andheri (W), Mumbai 400058 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pan. No. Aazfs0404K

section 153C of LT. Act, 1961 can be initiated in respect to person other than searched only if incriminating material belonging to such person has been found and seized from the premises of person searched. No incriminating documents found at the person searched being M/s. Artefact Projects Ltd. no valid proceedings under section 153C of IT Act, 1961 could have