Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Raipur38 Delhi28 Cochin24 Jaipur22 Karnataka21 Ahmedabad15 Nagpur8 Bangalore6 Mumbai5 Chandigarh5 Visakhapatnam3 Chennai3 Lucknow2 Kolkata2 Surat2 Panaji1 SC1 Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)10 Section 271C7 Deduction5 TDS5 Section 2014 Section 2504 Section 143(1)4 Condonation of Delay4 Exemption3 Section 133

AGILITY LOGISTICS P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT TDS 1(1), MUMBAI

In the result, both Department’s appeal and assessee’s cross objection are dismissed

ITA 4117/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Oct 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Saktijit Dey

For Appellant: Shri Dhanesh Bafna a/wFor Respondent: Shri R.P. Meena a/w

Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

271C of the Act for the assessment year 2011–12. ITA no.4117/Mum./2014 ITA no.4118/Mum./2014 2. These appeals by the assessee are against the confirmation of order passed under section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act. 3. Brief facts are, the assessee a company is engaged in the business of freight forwarding, logistics and transportation

AGILITY LOGISTICS P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT TDS 1(1), MUMBAI

AGILITY LOGISTICS P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT TDS 1(1), MUMBAI

CANARA BANK (E-SYNDICATE) BANDRA WEST II BRANCH,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS , MUMBAI

CANARA BANK (E-SYNDICATE) BANDRA WEST II BRANCH, MUMBAI,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS , MUMBAI

STATE BANK OF INDIA ,MUMBAI vs. ADDL.CIT-TDS,RANGE2(2), MUMBAI

REKHA MAHESHWARI ,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , DELHI