BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 234Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Hyderabad24Ahmedabad10Mumbai5Bangalore4Pune3Rajkot1Jaipur1Kolkata1Lucknow1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 139(1)5Deduction5Section 234A4Section 69A4Section 234F3Section 1473Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 2502Section 80P(2)(d)

NOBEL BIOCARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 15(2)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6880/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

For Appellant: Ms. Hinal Shah &For Respondent: Mr. Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, Sr. DR

section 234F of the IT Act ought to be deleted. the IT Act ought to be deleted. 5.1 We note that the Ld. CIT(A) disallowed the appeal of the We note that the Ld. CIT(A) disallowed the appeal of the We note that the Ld. CIT(A) disallowed the appeal of the assessee rejecting the application for condonation

NOBEL BIOCARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, 15(2)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6881/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

For Appellant: Ms. Hinal Shah &
2
Section 80P(2)(c)2
Condonation of Delay2
For Respondent: Mr. Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, Sr. DR

section 234F of the IT Act ought to be deleted. the IT Act ought to be deleted. 5.1 We note that the Ld. CIT(A) disallowed the appeal of the We note that the Ld. CIT(A) disallowed the appeal of the We note that the Ld. CIT(A) disallowed the appeal of the assessee rejecting the application for condonation

SHREE SPANAN FOUNDATION,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-CPC BANGALURU, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for\nstatistical purposes in above terms

ITA 2001/MUM/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Feb 2025AY 2020-21
Section 10BSection 12Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 234FSection 250

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as\n“the Act”] for the A.Y. 2020-21, wherein the appeal of the assessee was\ndismissed as not maintainable.\n2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is incorporated\nu/s 12 of the Companies Act which is formed for the betterment of blind\npeople

ANUP AJAY DANDAPAT,NALLASOPARA vs. ITO WARD 4(1), THANE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 657/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. OM PRAKASH KANT (Accountant Member), MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri. Bhupendra ShahFor Respondent: Shri. Ram Krishn Kedia, (SR. DR.)
Section 115BSection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 250Section 271ASection 69A

section 69A is not applicable. d. Arbitrarily rejecting details of cash deposits even though each and every details was submitted about the source and nature of receipt including confirmation of accounts of 3 parties and the applicable income is duly shown in the return of income. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned

SAGAR PREMISES CO-OPERATIVE SOCITEY LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC BENGALURU INCOME TAX OFFICER -17(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2797/MUM/2022[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Mar 2023AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shir Kuldip Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Blesagar Premises Co-Operative Society Ltd., V. Income Tax Officer – 17(3)(1) 327, Sagar Premises, Narshi Natha Street Kautilya Bhavan Kharek Bazar, Masjid (W), Mumbai - 400009 Bandra Kurla Complex Bandra(E), Mumbai - 400051 Pan: Aamas0482M (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 139(1)Section 234FSection 5ASection 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

234F of Income Tax Act, 1961, even though the return was filed on 24.09.2018 i.e. within due date under section 139(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 as the extended due date for assessee whose accounts are audited under any other law was 31.10.2018. 4. Appellant craves leave to add further grounds or to amend or alter the existing grounds