BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 206C(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Raipur39Chennai38Pune28Delhi16Cochin13Kolkata12Panaji10Rajkot9Dehradun8Bangalore8Jodhpur5Jaipur4Mumbai4Amritsar3Indore3Hyderabad3Ahmedabad1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 234E16Section 20016Section 200A8Section 200(3)8Section 1544Section 206C(3)4Section 200A(3)4Section 200A(1)(c)4Condonation of Delay

AGRAWAL DISTILLERIES PVT LTD,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), DELHI

Appeal are allowed:

ITA 1165/MUM/2024[2015-2016 (Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jun 2024

Bench: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Raj Singh Meel
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 206C(3)Section 234E

condone the delay of 57 days in filing the appeal and proceed to adjudicate the grounds raised in the appeal on merits. Since all the grounds raised pertain to common issue of levy of late fee under Section 234E of the Act the same are taken up together hereinafter. 6. The Appellant has challenged the levy of fee under Section

4
Rectification u/s 1544

AGRAWAL DISTILLERIES PVT LTD,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), DELHI

Appeal are allowed:

ITA 1173/MUM/2024[2013-2014 (Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jun 2024

Bench: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Raj Singh Meel
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 206C(3)Section 234E

condone the delay of 57 days in filing the appeal and proceed to adjudicate the grounds raised in the appeal on merits. Since all the grounds raised pertain to common issue of levy of late fee under Section 234E of the Act the same are taken up together hereinafter. 6. The Appellant has challenged the levy of fee under Section

AGRAWAL DISTILLERIES PVT LTD,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS), DELHI

Appeal are allowed:

ITA 1185/MUM/2024[2015-2016 Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jun 2024

Bench: the Tribunal. 4. We would first take up ITA No. 1173/Mum/2024 [Financial Year 2012-13: Quarter 2/Form 27EQ] as the lead matter which has been preferred by the Assessee challenging the order, dated 2

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Raj Singh Meel
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 206C(3)Section 234E

condone the delay of 57 days in filing the appeal and proceed to adjudicate the grounds raised in the appeal on merits. Since all the grounds raised pertain to common issue of levy of late fee under Section 234E of the Act the same are taken up together hereinafter. 6. The Appellant has challenged the levy of fee under Section

AGRAWAL DISTILLERIES PVT LTD,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), DELHI

Appeal are allowed:

ITA 1181/MUM/2024[2014-2015 (Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jun 2024

Bench: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Raj Singh Meel
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 206C(3)Section 234E

condone the delay of 57 days in filing the appeal and proceed to adjudicate the grounds raised in the appeal on merits. Since all the grounds raised pertain to common issue of levy of late fee under Section 234E of the Act the same are taken up together hereinafter. 6. The Appellant has challenged the levy of fee under Section