BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 200A(1)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna466Pune115Chennai85Delhi57Visakhapatnam29Dehradun19Cochin17Surat14Hyderabad13Panaji10Mumbai9Bangalore7Kolkata7Raipur6Amritsar5Agra4Nagpur4Indore3Chandigarh3Lucknow3Jaipur3Jabalpur1Jodhpur1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 234E42Section 20028Section 200A19Section 200(3)12Condonation of Delay5TDS5Section 1544Section 206C(3)4Section 200A(3)

AGRAWAL DISTILLERIES PVT LTD,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), DELHI

Appeal are allowed:

ITA 1165/MUM/2024[2015-2016 (Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jun 2024

Bench: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Raj Singh Meel
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 206C(3)Section 234E

c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period

4
Section 200A(1)(c)4
Rectification u/s 1544
Limitation/Time-bar4

AGRAWAL DISTILLERIES PVT LTD,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), DELHI

Appeal are allowed:

ITA 1173/MUM/2024[2013-2014 (Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jun 2024

Bench: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Raj Singh Meel
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 206C(3)Section 234E

c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period

AGRAWAL DISTILLERIES PVT LTD,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS), DELHI

Appeal are allowed:

ITA 1185/MUM/2024[2015-2016 Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jun 2024

Bench: the Tribunal. 4. We would first take up ITA No. 1173/Mum/2024 [Financial Year 2012-13: Quarter 2/Form 27EQ] as the lead matter which has been preferred by the Assessee challenging the order, dated 2

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Raj Singh Meel
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 206C(3)Section 234E

c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period

AGRAWAL DISTILLERIES PVT LTD,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), DELHI

Appeal are allowed:

ITA 1181/MUM/2024[2014-2015 (Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jun 2024

Bench: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Raj Singh Meel
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 206C(3)Section 234E

c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period

BALAJI GRAPHICS ART PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (TDS) CPC GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5871/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Smt.Renu Jauhri ()

Section 200ASection 234ESection 234e

c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having Assessment Years: 2013-14 to 2015-16 retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section

SHREE KALYAANEE KRRSNA BUILDERS,GHAZIABAD vs. TDS-CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the Appeals filed by the Assessee stands allowed

ITA 364/MUM/2023[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant, Am & Shri N. K. Choudhry, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 361/Mum/2023 To आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No. 364/Mum/2023 (ननधधारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14)

For Appellant: Shri A. N. Shah, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri A. S. Sant, Ld. DR
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 250Section 3

c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Sec. 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect-Resultantly, the demand u/s 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under section 200A by the respondent for the period

SHREE KALYAANEE KRRSNA BUILDERS,MUMBAI vs. TDS-CPC , UTTER PRADESH

In the result, all the Appeals filed by the Assessee stands allowed

ITA 361/MUM/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant, Am & Shri N. K. Choudhry, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 361/Mum/2023 To आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No. 364/Mum/2023 (ननधधारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14)

For Appellant: Shri A. N. Shah, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri A. S. Sant, Ld. DR
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 250Section 3

c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Sec. 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect-Resultantly, the demand u/s 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under section 200A by the respondent for the period

SHREE KALYAANEE KRRSNA BUILDERS,GHAZIABAD vs. TDS-CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the Appeals filed by the Assessee stands allowed

ITA 362/MUM/2023[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant, Am & Shri N. K. Choudhry, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 361/Mum/2023 To आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No. 364/Mum/2023 (ननधधारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14)

For Appellant: Shri A. N. Shah, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri A. S. Sant, Ld. DR
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 250Section 3

c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Sec. 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect-Resultantly, the demand u/s 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under section 200A by the respondent for the period

SHREE KALYAANEE KRRSNA BUILDERS,GHAZIABAD vs. TDS-CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the Appeals filed by the Assessee stands allowed

ITA 363/MUM/2023[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant, Am & Shri N. K. Choudhry, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 361/Mum/2023 To आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No. 364/Mum/2023 (ननधधारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14)

For Appellant: Shri A. N. Shah, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri A. S. Sant, Ld. DR
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 250Section 3

c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Sec. 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect-Resultantly, the demand u/s 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under section 200A by the respondent for the period