BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 167Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai10Delhi2Ahmedabad2Jaipur2Chennai1SC1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 80I18Section 167B10Section 143(1)7Section 1545Section 14A4Addition to Income4Section 1433Section 164(1)3Section 115B3House Property3Rectification u/s 1543Deduction3

BHAGIRATHI ENTERPRISE,VILE PARLE WEST MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 34(1)(1), BANDRA EAST MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for the AYs

ITA 3128/MUM/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jun 2025AY 2021-22
For Appellant: Shri Anant N. Pai, CAFor Respondent: Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 167B

delay is hereby condoned and all the\nappeals are admitted for adjudication.\n3. With the consent of both the parties, the appeal in ITA No.\n3128/Mum/2025 (AY. 2021-22) was taken as the lead case for the sake of\nconvenience and discussion wherein the assessee has taken the following\nground of appeal:\n“On facts and circumstances of the case

BHAGIRATHI ENTERPRISE,VILE PARLE WEST MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 34(1)(1), BANDRA EAST MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee for the AY

ITA 3130/MUM/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jun 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal

For Appellant: Shri Anant N. Pai, CAFor Respondent: Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 167BSection 2

delay is hereby condoned and all the appeals are admitted for adjudication. 3. With the consent of both the parties, the appeal in ITA No. 3128/Mum/2025 (AY. 2021-22) was taken as the lead case for the sake of convenience and discussion wherein the assessee has taken the following ground of appeal: “On facts and circumstances of the case

BHAGIRATHI ENTERPRISE,VILE PARLE WEST MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 34(1)(1), MUMBAI BANDRA EAST

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee for the AY

ITA 3129/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jun 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal

For Appellant: Shri Anant N. Pai, CAFor Respondent: Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 167BSection 2

delay is hereby condoned and all the appeals are admitted for adjudication. 3. With the consent of both the parties, the appeal in ITA No. 3128/Mum/2025 (AY. 2021-22) was taken as the lead case for the sake of convenience and discussion wherein the assessee has taken the following ground of appeal: “On facts and circumstances of the case

IEI SHAREHOLDING (PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT -1987) TRUST,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2222/MUM/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Jul 2024AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri Omkareshwar Chidaravs. Ito Ward 22(2)(1), Iei Shareholding(Personal Piramal Chambers, Development -1987) Trust, Lalbaugh, Ion House, 4Th Floor, Mumbai-400011. Dr. E Moses Road, Near Famous Studio, Mahalaxmi, Mumbai-400011. Pan/Gir No. Aaati0093D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

Section 164(1)Section 167B

167B of the Act . The Ld. AR emphasized that there are genuine reasons and the delay was not an wanton Act. The assessee has filed the application for condonation of delay before the CIT(A) referred at Page 5 Para4.6 of the CIT(A) order read as under: “4.6 The appellant has filed its reply/ explanation in response

DCIT CC 3(4) CEN RG 3, MUMBAI vs. PATEL ENGINEERING LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2485/MUM/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Jul 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon’Ble

Section 14ASection 154Section 199(2)Section 80I

167B r.w.s. 86 of the Act. A further without prejudice submission is that the company has substantial own funds by way of capital reserves aggregating Rs. 12,936 lacs which is more than 5.50 times of the balance in such JV / partnership firm. The sale proceeds of the appellant are deposited in the cash credit account and the debit balance

DCIT CC 3(4) CEN RG 3, MUMBAI vs. PATEL ENGINEERING LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2486/MUM/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Jul 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon’Ble

Section 14ASection 154Section 199(2)Section 80I

167B r.w.s. 86 of the Act. A further without prejudice submission is that the company has substantial own funds by way of capital reserves aggregating Rs. 12,936 lacs which is more than 5.50 times of the balance in such JV / partnership firm. The sale proceeds of the appellant are deposited in the cash credit account and the debit balance

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR 1(3)(1), INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT vs. SKATE TRADES AND AGENCIES PRIVATE LIMITED , RAICHUR STREET MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1663/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiyashri Sandeep Singh Karhaildy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(3)(1), Room No.535, Aayakar Bhawan, M.K. Road, Churchgate ............... Appellant Mumbai - 400020

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Bhangepatil Pushkaraj, Sr.DR
Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250

delay of 4 days in filing the present appeal by the Revenue is condoned. 3. When the present appeal was called for hearing, neither did anyone appear on behalf of the assessee, nor was any application seeking an adjournment filed. From the perusal of the record, we find that in the previous six hearings also no one appeared on behalf

HMIL SHAREHOLDING (EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE -1994) TRUST - 2,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 6(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3152/MUM/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Aug 2024AY 2022-23

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA (Accountant Member)

Section 143(1)Section 164(1)Section 167B

Section 167B by also adding surcharge at 37% of dividend income as against surcharge @15% added by the assessee, which was correct as per law. 4 M/s. HMIL Shareholding (Educational Assistance-1994) Trust-2 8. Since ld. CIT (A) has not decided the issue on merits and dismissed the appeal on the ground of delay therefore, in the interest

DCIT CC 3(4) CEN RG 3, MUMBAI vs. PATEL ENGINEERING LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and the cross objection of the Assessee is allowed in part in terms indicated herein above

ITA 3643/MUM/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Ashwani Taneja

For Appellant: Shri Mayur KisnadwalaFor Respondent: Smt Vidisha Kalra
Section 143(3)Section 801A(4)Section 80I

delay is condoned. 2. The first issue in the appeal of the Revenue is regarding disallowance of claim for deduction u/s 80IA(4) in respect of the projects other than the Teesta Lower Dam project. 3. At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee submits that the claim for deduction u/s 80IA(4) has been allowed by the Coordinate

IEI SHAREHOLDING (GENERAL ASSISTANCE -1991) TRUST,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1842/MUM/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Aug 2024AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail & Smt. Renu Jauhriiei Shareholding (General V/S. Deputy Director Of Income Assistance-1991) Trust बनाम Tax, Cpc, Bengaluru Ion House, 4Th Floor, Dr. E 1St Floor, Prestige Alpha Moses Road, Near Famous No. 48/1 48/2, Studio, Mahalaxmi, Beratenaagrahara Begur, Maharashtra-400011 Hosur Rd. Uttarahalli Hobli, Bengaluru Karnataka-560100 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aaaai0916J Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Shri Motichand GuptaFor Respondent: Shri R. R. Makwana
Section 164(1)Section 167BSection 250

section 164(1) of the Act read with proviso (iv), at the slab rates. 5. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A) has erred in holding the delay in filing of the appeal by the Appellant as 'inordinate' and without 'sufficient cause', and dismissing the appeal without any discussion on merits