BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

117 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 144C(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi130Mumbai117Kolkata36Hyderabad35Chennai31Bangalore31Pune27Jaipur13Ahmedabad11Indore8Nagpur5Chandigarh5Visakhapatnam3Rajkot3Dehradun2Cochin2Agra1SC1Lucknow1Raipur1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)88Addition to Income41Penalty28Transfer Pricing22Section 92C20Condonation of Delay19Section 10A18Section 80I17Section 144C(13)

GETINGE MEDICAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 2(2)(1), MUMBAI MAHARASHTRA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 4872/MUM/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Mar 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Shri Girish Agrawal ()

Section 115Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 156Section 234ASection 270ASection 37Section 41Section 41(1)(a)

144C(13) r.w.s. 1443 of the Act, dated 23- 9 Getinge Medical India Private Limited 07-2024. In an appeal against the order under section 143(3), the additions/dis-allowances made in intimation under section 143(1) cannot be challenged, as there is no automatic merger of the 143(1) intimation with the order u/s 143(3). In respect of merger

Showing 1–20 of 117 · Page 1 of 6

17
Disallowance17
Section 316
Section 144C16

CADMATIC OY,MUMBAI vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INT TAX), CIRCLE-2(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 540/MUM/2023[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Dec 2023AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra SinghFor Respondent: Shri Anil Sant
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 195

1)(vii) of the Act and Article–12(3) of the India–Finland DTAA. 6. Subsequently, the learned DRP, vide its directions dated 29/11/2021, issued under section 144C(5) of the Act, rejected the objections filed by the assessee and held that the payment made by the companies in India to the Cadmatic OY ITA no.540/Mum./2023 assessee

DCIT 5(3)(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S SERCO BPO PVT. LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and the CO filed by the assessee is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 2354/MUM/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shir Pavan Kumar Gadaledcit – 5(3)(1) Vs. M/S Serco Bpo Pvt Room No. 573, Ltd.(As Successor Of Aayakar Bhavan, Intelnet Global Service Mumbai – 400 020. Pvtltd),Teleperformance Tower, Plot Cst No. 1406-A/28, Mindspace, Goregaon (W), Mumbai -400104. Pan/Gir No. : Aabcv2572L Appellant .. Respondent Co No. 136/Mum/2022 [Arising Out Of 2354/Mum/2022] (A.Y: 2009-10) Teleperformance Global Vs. Dcit – 5(3)(1) Service Pvt Ltd(Earlier Room No. 573, Serco Bpo Pvt Ltd), Aayakar Bhavan, Teleperformance Tower, Mumbai – 400020. Plot Cst No. 1406-A/28, Mindspace, Goregaon(W) Mumbai- 400104. Pan/Gir No. : Aabcv2572L Appellant .. Respondent

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 68

144C(1) 2 23.03.2015 Order u/s 143(1) Addition u/s 68 r.w.s 147 passed made to book ITA No. 2354/Mum/2022 & CO. 136/Mum/2022 M/s Serco BPO Pvt Ltd, Mumbai. by the AO profit u/s 115JB of the Act 3 16.09.2017 Order u/s 154 Rectification rectfying the order made on two u/s 147 of the Act issues. dated 23.03.2015 1. unexplained passed

DBS BANK LTD (DBS BANK LTD., INDIA BRANCHES NOW CONVERTED INTO DBS BANK INDIA LTD),MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT TXT)-2(1)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 3691/MUM/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Hon’Ble & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwala/Shri Madhur Agarwal, A/RsFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Permpurna, CIT, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 28Section 36Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(2)Section 37(1)Section 44C

144C(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is ab-initio void being barred by limitation and hence, ought to be struck down. The appellants crave leave to add, to amend, alter, vary, omit or substitute the aforesaid grounds of appeal or add a new ground or grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing

CAPGEMINI TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA LIMITED (SUCCESSOR TO CAPGEMINI INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,AIROLI, NAVI MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)- 55, MUMBAI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 2657/MUM/2023[AY 2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Jul 2024

Bench: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri M P LohiaFor Respondent: Shri Vachashpati Tripathi
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(3)Section 92C

Section 144C(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. The appeal against the order impugned by way of present appeal was originally filed before the Pune Bench of the Tribunal within the prescribed period. Vide order, dated 04/07/2023 [stated to have been uploaded on 17/07/2023] passed in ITA NO. 294/PUN/2018, the aforesaid appeal

HDFC BANK LIMITED (AS SUCCESSOR TO HDFC LTD),MUMBAI vs. DCIT 2(3)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 2665/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 143(3)

144C(3) | 2015-16 | Revenue 29. | 1890/Mum/2023 | ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 042(1) | 31.03.2023 | DCIT (TP)- 2(1)(1), Mumbai | 23.12.2019 | 143(3) | 2016-17 | Assessee 30. | 2049/Mum/2023 | ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 042(1) | 31.03.2023 | DCIT(TP)- 2(1)(1), Mumbai | 23.12.2019 | 143(3) | 2016-17 | Revenue 31. | 1891/Mum/2023 | ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 738(1) | 31.03.2023 | DCIT-1(1

ACIT-2(3)(1), MUMBAI vs. HDFC BANK LTD ( MERGED ENTITY HDFC INVESTMENTS LIMITED ), MUMBAI

ITA 2980/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi, Advocate a

144C(3) 2015-16 Revenue 29 1890/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 042(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT (TP)- 2(1)(1), Mumbai 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Assessee 30 2049/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 042(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT(TP)- 2(1)(1), Mumbai 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Revenue 31 1891/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 738(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT-1(1

HDFC BANK LIMITED (AS SUCCESSOR TO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LTD.),MUMBAI vs. DCIT, RANGE-1(1)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 1890/MUM/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi

144C(3) 2015-16 Revenue 29 1890/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 042(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT (TP)- 2(1)(1), Mumbai 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Assessee 30 2049/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 042(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT(TP)- 2(1)(1), Mumbai 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Revenue 31 1891/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 738(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT-1(1

HDFC BANK LIMITED (AS SUCCESSOR TO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LTD),MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT RG 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 5033/MUM/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jan 2025AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi, Advocate and Shri Ninad Patade, CAFor Respondent: Shri Biswanath Das, CIT DR
Section 1

144C(3) 228(1) 29 1890/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA 31.03.2023 DCIT (TP)- 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Assessee C/S/250/202 2(1)(1), 2- Mumbai 23/1051775 042(1) 30 2049/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA 31.03.2023 DCIT(TP)- 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Revenue C/S/250/202 2(1)(1), 2- Mumbai 23/1051775 042(1) 31 1891/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA 31.03.2023 DCIT-1(1)(2), 28.12.2019 143(3) 2017-18 Assessee

HDFC BANK LIMITED (AS SUCCESSOR TO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LTD),MUMBAI vs. DCIT RG 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 4313/MUM/2010[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jan 2025AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi, Advocate and Shri Ninad Patade, CAFor Respondent: Shri Biswanath Das, CIT DR
Section 1

144C(3) 228(1) 29 1890/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA 31.03.2023 DCIT (TP)- 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Assessee C/S/250/202 2(1)(1), 2- Mumbai 23/1051775 042(1) 30 2049/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA 31.03.2023 DCIT(TP)- 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Revenue C/S/250/202 2(1)(1), 2- Mumbai 23/1051775 042(1) 31 1891/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA 31.03.2023 DCIT-1(1)(2), 28.12.2019 143(3) 2017-18 Assessee

ADDL CIT RG 1(1), MUMBAI vs. HDFC LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 3785/MUM/2009[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jan 2025AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi, Advocate and Shri Ninad Patade, CAFor Respondent: Shri Biswanath Das, CIT DR
Section 1

144C(3) 228(1) 29 1890/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA 31.03.2023 DCIT (TP)- 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Assessee C/S/250/202 2(1)(1), 2- Mumbai 23/1051775 042(1) 30 2049/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA 31.03.2023 DCIT(TP)- 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Revenue C/S/250/202 2(1)(1), 2- Mumbai 23/1051775 042(1) 31 1891/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA 31.03.2023 DCIT-1(1)(2), 28.12.2019 143(3) 2017-18 Assessee

HDFC BANK LIMITED (AS SUCCESSOR TO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LTD),MUMBAI vs. DCIT 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 2867/MUM/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jan 2025AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi, Advocate and Shri Ninad Patade, CAFor Respondent: Shri Biswanath Das, CIT DR
Section 1

144C(3) 228(1) 29 1890/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA 31.03.2023 DCIT (TP)- 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Assessee C/S/250/202 2(1)(1), 2- Mumbai 23/1051775 042(1) 30 2049/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA 31.03.2023 DCIT(TP)- 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Revenue C/S/250/202 2(1)(1), 2- Mumbai 23/1051775 042(1) 31 1891/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA 31.03.2023 DCIT-1(1)(2), 28.12.2019 143(3) 2017-18 Assessee

ACIT-1(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 2046/MUM/2023[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jan 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi, Advocate and

144C(3) 2015-16 Revenue 29 1890/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 042(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT (TP)- 2(1)(1), Mumbai 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Assessee 30 2049/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 042(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT(TP)- 2(1)(1), Mumbai 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Revenue 31 1891/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 738(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT-1(1

DCIT - 1(1)(2), MUMBAI vs. HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORARTION LTD., MUMBAI

ITA 2862/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jan 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi, Advoca

144C(3) 2015-16 Revenue 29 1890/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 042(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT (TP)- 2(1)(1), Mumbai 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Assessee 30 2049/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 042(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT(TP)- 2(1)(1), Mumbai 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Revenue 31 1891/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 738(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT-1(1

HDFC BANK LIMITED (AS SUCCESSOR TO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LTD),MUMBAI vs. DCIT RG 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 4314/MUM/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jan 2025AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawal

144C(3) 2015-16 Revenue 29. 1890/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 042(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT (TP)- 2(1)(1), Mumbai 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Assessee 30. 2049/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 042(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT(TP)- 2(1)(1), Mumbai 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Revenue 31. 1891/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 738(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT-1(1

INFOR GLOBAL SOLUTIONS BARNEVELD) BV ( NOW KNOWN AS INFOR (BARNEVELD) BV),HYDERABAD vs. DDIT (IT) CIR 3(1), MUMBAI

The appeals of the revenue stands dismissed and that of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 777/MUM/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Jun 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri G S Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla

Section 143(3)

section 144C(5). 17. At the outset, it is noted that appeal filed by the assessee is barred by limitation by 33 days. In the application for condonation of delay, the assessee has stated following reasons:-  “The Company is a foreign Company based out of the Netherlands with no operations and presence in India;  On receipt of the final assessment

ADIT (IT) 3(2), MUMBAI vs. BAAN GLOBAL B.V. NOW KNOWN AS INFORMATION GLOBAL SOLUTION ( BARNEVELD) BV, MUMBAI

The appeals of the revenue stands dismissed and that of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 7048/MUM/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Jun 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri G S Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla

Section 143(3)

section 144C(5). 17. At the outset, it is noted that appeal filed by the assessee is barred by limitation by 33 days. In the application for condonation of delay, the assessee has stated following reasons:-  “The Company is a foreign Company based out of the Netherlands with no operations and presence in India;  On receipt of the final assessment

ITO (IT) TDS 3, MUMBAI vs. SSA GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES (I) P.LTD ( FORMERLY KNWONA AS INFOR GLOBAL SOLUTIONS (I) P.LTD), MUMBAI

The appeals of the revenue stands dismissed and that of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 3049/MUM/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Jun 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri G S Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla

Section 143(3)

section 144C(5). 17. At the outset, it is noted that appeal filed by the assessee is barred by limitation by 33 days. In the application for condonation of delay, the assessee has stated following reasons:-  “The Company is a foreign Company based out of the Netherlands with no operations and presence in India;  On receipt of the final assessment

INFOR GLOBAL SOLUTIONS BARNEVELD) BV,HYDERABAD vs. DDIT (IT) CIR 3(1), MUMBAI

The appeals of the revenue stands dismissed and that of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 776/MUM/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Jun 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri G S Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla

Section 143(3)

section 144C(5). 17. At the outset, it is noted that appeal filed by the assessee is barred by limitation by 33 days. In the application for condonation of delay, the assessee has stated following reasons:-  “The Company is a foreign Company based out of the Netherlands with no operations and presence in India;  On receipt of the final assessment

HDFC BANK LIMITED (AS SUCCESSOR TO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LTD),MUMBAI vs. THE ADDL CIT RG 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 4315/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jan 2025AY 2002-2003

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi, Advocate and

144C(3) 2015-16 Revenue 29 1890/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 042(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT (TP)- 2(1)(1), Mumbai 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Assessee 30 2049/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 042(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT(TP)- 2(1)(1), Mumbai 23.12.2019 143(3) 2016-17 Revenue 31 1891/Mum/2023 ITBA/NFA C/S/250/202 2- 23/1051775 738(1) 31.03.2023 DCIT-1(1