BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 12A(1)(ba)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune25Delhi16Kolkata8Ahmedabad5Indore4Mumbai4Jaipur3Chennai3Hyderabad3Nagpur2Bangalore2Cochin1Patna1Rajkot1Jodhpur1Visakhapatnam1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 1121Section 143(1)8Section 2503Disallowance3Exemption3Section 234A2Section 234F2Section 143(1)(a)2Deduction

DR. PRABHA ATRE FOUNDATION,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX EXEMPTION WARD 1(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 124/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 May 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Sandeep Singh Karhail & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Sanjiv Brahme and Shri Jayant Bhatt, ARsFor Respondent: Shri Kiran Unavekar, SR. DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 139Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)

condoning the delay of filing of audit report in Form-10B, CPC disallowed the claim of expenditure incurred for the charitable purposes. Assessee has failed to follow the procedural guidelines to avail the benefit of exemption u/s.11 of the Act and thus he upheld the disallowance of expenditure incurred for the charitable purposes amounting to Rs.19

2
Addition to Income2

SHA HURGOWAN ANANDJI DESAI CHARITIES ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC , BENGULURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee

ITA 2807/MUM/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Aug 2024AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail () Assessment Year: 2022-23 Sha Hurgowan Anandji Desai Dy. Director Of Income-Tax, Cpc Charities, Bengaluru, 18, Bhaskar Lane, Bhuleshwar, Vs. Income Tax Officer Exemption Mumbai-400002. Ward 2(3), 6Th Floor, Mtnl Te Building Pedder Road, Mumbai-400026. Pan No. Aaats 0405 R Appellant Respondent

For Respondent: Ms. Vasanti Patel, &
Section 11

Ba Processing Centre, Bangalore (herein after referred to as the AO) ngalore (herein after referred to as the AO) on the grounds that the Appellant did not furnish Audit Report in on the grounds that the Appellant did not furnish Audit Report in on the grounds that the Appellant did not furnish Audit Report in Form 10 Form

SHREE SPANAN FOUNDATION,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-CPC BANGALURU, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for\nstatistical purposes in above terms

ITA 2001/MUM/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Feb 2025AY 2020-21
Section 10BSection 12Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 234FSection 250

delay in furnishing ITR as well in\naccordance with the provisions of Section 139(4A). Clearly,\nSection 12A (1)(ba) clearly specifies that the person in receipt of\nincome is required to furnish the ITR u/s 139(4A) within the time\nallowed under that Section. Thus, the appeal application suffers\nfrom twin defaults on the counts of furnishing

NEW BOMBAY MERCHANTS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT, CPC BANGALORE, CPC BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 6916/MUM/2024[2016-2017]Status: HeardITAT Mumbai24 Feb 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shriamarjit Singh & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Ms. Monika H Pande,SR AR)
Section 11Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 234BSection 246ASection 250

delay in Form 10B which is obtained on 30/09/2016 under sub sections (2)of the section 33 and 34 of Bombay Public Trust, 1950. On the basis of this audit report the expenses are duly claimed by the assessee trust. During processing of return under section 143(1), the Ld.AO disallowed the exemption under section